This is ****in BS

Ok thanks for you insider view.

I really value all the guesses you have.

Rabble rabble rabble

Stop moving the goalposts. If a percentage determines then one game difference makes no difference as long as there is not a tie, as that is half a win in that calculation. Although that still would not put either ahead of the Chief's percentage.
The argument of a team getting an extra week off is a different argument.

So, since the cards lay as they may (I still think it's BS - Bills/Bengals could have still been played IMHO) we are the #1 seed. Neutral ground or not, WE can win and move on to the SB. So my ? is this, IF the CHIEFS advance to the SB, who do you want them to face? Eagles, 49er's, other? Actually trying to stay positive for this season. :thumb:

Goodell must really hate skyline chili. Bengals got massively ****ed.

To some extent, but they are also losing the bye assuming we win on Saturday and likely having to play the Bengals again in the divisional round.

Right, but look at the poster saying otherwise...

It's baffling when Pete talks about stocks and business stuff and when he talks about sports. I swear it has to be two different people using the account.

A multi billion dollar enterprise doesn’t have procedures put in place about this situation? Leadership needs to go bye bye.

Look at the poster making shit up like he actually knows and getting mad about it.

They should lose the bye. They refused to play! They should have to forfeit.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The path got a little easier since the Bills will now play their starters and Pats have to win or they are out (unless the Browns beat the Steelers and Jets beat the Fins)

The Steelers now have a pretty decent shot to make it as well, all they need is the Bills to win, Jets to win and they have to beat the Browns.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why are the owners voting on the proposed solution to the cancellation of Bills-Bengals? Because the steps being suggested conflict with the plain terms of the NFL&#39;s 2002 policy manual regarding canceled games. <a href="https://t.co/GYAob3nhIP">https://t.co/GYAob3nhIP</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1611202600929529858?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Having to make up new rules to screw the Chiefs over.

This is probably the least damaging meddling the NFL could have done, so not too bad. In my opinion, the benefits of the #1 seed in the playoffs are, in order of importance:

1. Bye week
2. Avoiding a pathway to the SB requiring victories over both the #2 and #3 seeds.
3. Hosting the championship game.

Sure, playing in Arrowhead is preferred, but the Chiefs are no slouch on the road and are far from invincible playing at home. Relatively small effect, all things considered.

guesses? the NFL should have insisted, particularly knowing the timeline the Dr.s shared today...