ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Geno Smith vs Alex Smith - It's on. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=272597)

BigCatDaddy 09-24-2013 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 10015392)
If we had drafted Bray first overall, people would be happier than they are now.

Maybe. Obviously we don't get to sit into interviews and aren't privledged to all the information the people making the calls are. If he was taken first that would have meant he didn't screw up in interviews and such or for whatever reason he fell so you are basically talking about an imaginary player in a sense.

If they had done that though does that change everything leading up to the draft? I'm assuming Daniel isn't here at 3 million a year and Bray is the backup. That's a plus. I'm assuming Stephenson is the RT and playing better than Fisher. That's a plus.

I don't know. Interesting thought, and I'm not sure we wouldnt' be better off now and in the future.

Red Gorilla 09-24-2013 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 10015392)
If we had drafted Bray first overall, people would be happier than they are now.

I would say about 20% would be. I think the poll at the top of the thread would be about the same if that was the question.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-24-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BourbonMan (Post 10014843)
Maybe..If he can also get his EGO in check...The whole superman thing is stupid.

To all you GENO-HOMOS..
Lets say we went ahead with the Alex trade, but then picked Geno at 1.1
Started Alex, made Geno ride the pine, but still had our current 3-0 record with Alex...would you still be bitching?

**** NO.

Winston could have served the purpose of "win now" easily. EASILY. And probably better than rookie Fisher.
Goddamnit people; he may have been the best tackle in the draft, but he WAS NOT a tackle worth taking with a 1.1. PERIOD.

Anywho; back to the subject at hand. Trading for Alex, picking up Geno, and acquiring Bray would have been the best goddamned draft this franchise has had in DECADES. DECADES.
Our QB roster was pure dogshit in 2012, and with these selections/moves, it would have upgraded to out-****ing-STANDING overnight.

Ragged Robin 09-24-2013 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 10017121)
**** NO.

Winston could have served the purpose of "win now" easily. EASILY. And probably better than rookie Fisher.
Goddamnit people; he may have been the best tackle in the draft, but he WAS NOT a tackle worth taking with a 1.1. PERIOD.

Anywho; back to the subject at hand. Trading for Alex, picking up Geno, and acquiring Bray would have been the best goddamned draft this franchise has had in DECADES. DECADES.
Our QB roster was pure dogshit in 2012, and with these selections/moves, it would have upgraded to out-****ing-STANDING overnight.

Well we currently have 2/3 so that's pretty good right? :spock:

BigMeatballDave 09-25-2013 12:42 AM

I really ****ing hate it when people act like they know it all.

Most of them know exactly squat.

|Zach| 09-25-2013 01:26 AM

ROFL

007 09-25-2013 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 10013932)
Smith is 29. He's got a five to eight year window (min/max) to play with, especially in this system.

Bray is going to get the Rogers treatment and learn under Reid/Smith for the better part of four years. That's a positive. A big positive as his mechanicals are yuck, but his raw tools and skill set are very good and Smith is very fundamentally sound and Reid has been very effective in coaching QB's.

Daniels...meh. He is what he is - a backup.

The situation is okay.

Why do people keep saying this? He has only truly coached ONE QB. He didn't do squat with the rest.

duncan_idaho 09-25-2013 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 10015312)
Yup. There were no Can't miss prospects in the 2013 draft, which is why the Chiefs should have gone with the best QB prospect (considering it is the most important position in sports). This was the year to "take that risk".

Good thing we selected a project RT, because that isn't risky at all.

My thoughts/opinions exactly.

This draft sucks! No impact players! Everyone has warts!

When presented with a bunch of bad, risky options, take the one with the most upside and potential impact.

Priest31kc 09-25-2013 08:34 AM

ESPN Stats & Info ‏@ESPNStatsInfo 4m
Geno Smith & Aaron Rodgers lead NFL in completions on throws 21+ yards in air with 9

:(

KCrockaholic 09-25-2013 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Priest31kc (Post 10017747)
ESPN Stats & Info ‏@ESPNStatsInfo 4m
Geno Smith & Aaron Rodgers lead NFL in completions on throws 21+ yards in air with 9

:(

Only thing Geno throws is quick hitches and smoke screens.

Messier 09-25-2013 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru (Post 10017414)
Why do people keep saying this? He has only truly coached ONE QB. He didn't do squat with the rest.

That's not true. Getting bad QBs to play so well that teams want them badly enough to give up high draft picks is doing more than squat. Reid is good with QBs. Other than in his last season, what QB didn't play well for him?

Marcellus 09-25-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Priest31kc (Post 10017747)
ESPN Stats & Info ‏@ESPNStatsInfo 4m
Geno Smith & Aaron Rodgers lead NFL in completions on throws 21+ yards in air with 9

:(

3TD's 6 Ints.

Molitoth 09-25-2013 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10017763)
3TD's 6 Ints.

Go find Peyton Manning's first 3 games stats.... or Perhaps Alex Smith's.

Do QB's not improve their turnover ratios as they gain experience? Geno will learn what he can't get away with in the NFL and he will stop trying to force silly passes he got away with in college. It's called learning and getting better.

But whatever, you have such Hate for Geno Smith that it doesn't matter if he turns out Elite, you are still going to hate him.

OnTheWarpath15 09-25-2013 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 10017761)
That's not true. Getting bad QBs to play so well that teams want them badly enough to give up high draft picks is doing more than squat. Reid is good with QBs. Other than in his last season, what QB didn't play well for him?

I posted this back in February:

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9425271)
Yep.

Combined numbers for QB starts under Andy Reid NOT named Donovan McNabb:

38-44 record (.463)
55% completion percentage
112 TD's
94 INT's
70 QBR.


And those numbers are inflated due to Vick, who was a #1 overall pick.

Reid had success with the #2 overall pick.

Otherwise, the average numbers for every other QB he's "hand-picked" have been ****ing brutal.

Molitoth 09-25-2013 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 10017773)
I posted this back in February:



Reid had success with the #2 overall pick.

Otherwise, the average numbers for every other QB he's "hand-picked" have been ****ing brutal.

Yup. Whenever I hear "Reid is a QB guru", I just laugh.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.