ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs listing McCluster as a WR (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227117)

DaneMcCloud 04-24-2010 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6708129)
Dane thinks Arenas is going to run back 20 kicks for TD's, either that or you mean impact the game by getting beat seeing as he was prominently featured in the other players highlight packages.

I'd appreciate it if you didn't put words in my mouth.

For someone who repeatedly states that they don't drink or do drugs, you often post like someone who's jacked out of their mind.

BryanBusby 04-24-2010 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 6708121)
not all problems are the same

a problem at nickel corner is not near as important as a problem at NT

and nickle cbs are easier to find than NTs

when you have 2 nts sitting in your lap in the 2nd round of a strong draft you don't draft a nickle cb (who was a reach anyways)

these decisions haunt us....

Considering how often Defenses are having to play in the nickel package now a days, I'd say a problem at nickel corner is a big deal. I guess some of you must of forgot of a certain nickel that gave Smiles Austin a career game.

|Zach| 04-24-2010 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6708137)
I'd appreciate it if you didn't put words in my mouth.

For someone who repeatedly states that they don't drink or do drugs, you often post like someone who's jacked out of their mind.

41 times a day.

Jesus ****ing christ.

Mecca 04-24-2010 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6708135)
Just for the sake of your case, can you post the highlight videos that you're referring too so we can all see what the fuss is about?

If you watched ESPN's draft coverage Arenas was prominently featured in both McCluster and Shipley's highlight vids getting his ass beat.

QuikSsurfer 04-24-2010 12:47 AM

Quality post. Agree on most all parts

edit: keg

keg in kc 04-24-2010 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 6708124)
93.

The one and only year Carl delivered and gave us a SB competitive team.

And that is sad.

It is sad both in how long it's been and sad in the fact that we've been unable to replicate it...

Just my luck that I wasn't in town yet, to see a hall-of-fame quarterback overcome the shortcomings of a conservative coach. I've had a wonderful decade of Gunther and Grbac, Vermeil and Robinson, Vermeil and Gunther, Herm and Gunther. Carl finally leaves and I get Haley (who I like) and Cassel (who I don't).

I don't have a Montana to look back upon.

the Talking Can 04-24-2010 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6708133)
You can't say that with absolute certainty.

At least this year, they took playmakers.

We'll see how it pays off in 2010 and beyond.

i absolutely can, we've been making them for years....no clue about value and which positions matter and which don't

Mr. Flopnuts 04-24-2010 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6708134)
Speak for yourself. Franchise QB my ass. It was simply an unnecessary pick, especially when one looks at the roster and the needs the team had with the players available in the draft.

Quarterback was the least of the worries at that point. So was slot receiver, especially after signing Urban.

I understand that the kid is dynamic, presents an "uncatchable" force on the outside in a multi-receiver/back set, but for Christ's sake, how about getting a situation established where the core of the team, offense or defense is established before we start picking toys that we play with 15% of the time at max in a game. ****!

If we want to take a ****ing receiver at that point, how about Damian Williams, who is also a solid return guy, and at 6'1", 200 lbs., he's also a sure handed, legit #2 receiver. ****!

LMAO You weren't included in my "people."

Mecca 04-24-2010 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6708137)
I'd appreciate it if you didn't put words in my mouth.

For someone who repeatedly states that they don't drink or do drugs, you often post like someone who's jacked out of their mind.

So how exactly does a 3rd CB have a huge impact on a game then?

Reaper16 04-24-2010 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6708136)
I like how two years in a row they have totally went against the draft board. Not to mention the franchise crippling trade last year for that worthless dog shit Cassel.

They don't go against their own draft board, though. Its just that Pioli's draft board doesn't seem to take into account value of any kind. Pioli identifies players that he likes and he gets those players. If it means taking a nickle/dime CB/return man in the second round then so be it. Its a strategy that is abhorrent to me but that's his thing.

|Zach| 04-24-2010 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6708144)
LMAO You weren't included in my "people."

http://threetreesstudios.com/andscif...-my-people.png

ChiefsCountry 04-24-2010 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6708142)
Just my luck that I wasn't in town yet, to see a hall-of-fame quarterback overcome the shortcomings of a conservative coach. I've had a wonderful decade of Gunther and Grbac, Vermeil and Robinson, Vermeil and Gunther, Herm and Gunther. Carl finally leaves and I get Haley (who I like) and Cassel (who I don't).

I don't have a Montana to look back upon.

95 and 97 teams were way more talented than the 93 team but Montana was the reason for the success. It was a fun ride that year.

KCrockaholic 04-24-2010 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6708140)
If you watched ESPN's draft coverage Arenas was prominently featured in both McCluster and Shipley's highlight vids getting his ass beat.

McCluster Pwned a lot of guys including our own Eric Berry. But I didn't see a couple of highlight reels on ESPN.

BryanBusby 04-24-2010 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6708145)
So how exactly does a 3rd CB have a huge impact on a game then?

Ask this question to Miles Austin and Maurice Leggett.

ChiefsCountry 04-24-2010 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6708146)
They don't go against their own draft board, though. Its just that Pioli's draft board doesn't seem to take into account value of any kind. Pioli identifies players that he likes and he gets those players. If it means taking a nickle/dime CB/return man in the second round then so be it. Its a strategy that is abhorrent to me but that's his thing.

Thats why I would rather had somebody from the Ravens organization.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.