ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Post your media crying material here (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=356869)

RedinTexas 01-29-2025 08:12 AM

Imagine what it would take to initiate a conspiracy in which the referees will favor one team over all of the others.

1 - Someone like the commissioner or the head of referees would have to decide to do it. It's taken for granted that they would want it because of tv ratings, but the legal peril would be enormous. Prison awaits for anyone that initiated or took part in any such conspiracy.

2 - The initiator would have to bring other people into that conspiracy. Everyone knows it would be highly illegal and failing to report such communications is also punishable. So, as the initiator, you're taking a huge chance merely by talking to anyone else about putting such a conspiracy into motion.

3 - You and your conspirators must then involve all of the officials. Bringing the officials into the conspiracy involves all of the same dangers. Surely there would be at least SOME honest officials that would not only refuse to take part, but would immediately "blow the whistle" on such conspiracy.

4 - Finally, you need to get everyone to stay quiet about this conspiracy. Nobody can retire and write a tell-all book. I dealt with classified information in the Air Force and one of the biggest problems with keeping classified information secret is that increasing the number of people that know that information exponentially increases the likelihood that the information gets out.

5 - Why would any owner allow such a conspiracy to happen? The real value of owning a team in the NFL is the increase in value of the team. Any conspiracy to push one team over all others could kill the entire league and therefore, every team. Why would any owner risk the $5-$10 BILLION asset they have in their team just for some temporary tv ratings?

There is lots more, but let's leave it at that.

Danguardace 01-29-2025 08:18 AM

https://x.com/MadDogRadio/status/188...zgIswH4lw&s=19

htismaqe 01-29-2025 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17943145)
Yeah far too many people think that the NFL is essentially the WWE.

They have an antitrust exemption - rigged!

htismaqe 01-29-2025 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 17943256)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">.<a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/PSchrags?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@PSchrags</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/danorlovsky7?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@danorlovsky7</a> We can stay w false narratives or discuss this-KC was 17th in %of scoring drives that were aided by a penalty for a first down on such drives in regular season-number 1? Wait for it …Buffalo 33% of scoring drives were aided by penalty for a first…</p>&mdash; Mitch Holthus (@mitchholthus) <a href="https://twitter.com/mitchholthus/status/1884454040177656277?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 29, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

God bless Mitch but he works for the Chiefs. Even if he didn't, he's wasting his time.

ShortRoundChief 01-29-2025 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 17943365)
I love a good conspiracy-but some of these people are ****ed in the head.

Lets hope they stay away from politics.


We need some serious mental help in this world--this is the effect of the internet.


Here. Here. Once the internet became the next big thing people stopped communicating in person, scam rates went through the roof, and all hell broke through.



I remember having to ground my pre-teen son outside just so he would go out and meet people.



Teh intrawebz is da Debil.

htismaqe 01-29-2025 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 17943353)
There is literally zero statistical evidence KC gets ref help. None biy the media and fans are mad because we win too much. That's it.

There's actually a MOUNTAIN of evidence they don't get the refs help.

It simply doesn't matter. Evidence is for thinking people. These people are pure emotion.

htismaqe 01-29-2025 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by displacedinMN (Post 17943365)
I love a good conspiracy-but some of these people are ****ed in the head.

Lets hope they stay away from politics.


We need some serious mental help in this world--this is the effect of the internet.

That's what I've been trying to say and why this bothers me so much. If they're willing to go to these leaps of logic for a GAME, we as a society are straight ****ed. Critical thinking is dead. Bring on the tears.

htismaqe 01-29-2025 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedinTexas (Post 17943402)
Imagine what it would take to initiate a conspiracy in which the referees will favor one team over all of the others.

1 - Someone like the commissioner or the head of referees would have to decide to do it. It's taken for granted that they would want it because of tv ratings, but the legal peril would be enormous. Prison awaits for anyone that initiated or took part in any such conspiracy.

2 - The initiator would have to bring other people into that conspiracy. Everyone knows it would be highly illegal and failing to report such communications is also punishable. So, as the initiator, you're taking a huge chance merely by talking to anyone else about putting such a conspiracy into motion.

3 - You and your conspirators must then involve all of the officials. Bringing the officials into the conspiracy involves all of the same dangers. Surely there would be at least SOME honest officials that would not only refuse to take part, but would immediately "blow the whistle" on such conspiracy.

4 - Finally, you need to get everyone to stay quiet about this conspiracy. Nobody can retire and write a tell-all book. I dealt with classified information in the Air Force and one of the biggest problems with keeping classified information secret is that increasing the number of people that know that information exponentially increases the likelihood that the information gets out.

5 - Why would any owner allow such a conspiracy to happen? The real value of owning a team in the NFL is the increase in value of the team. Any conspiracy to push one team over all others could kill the entire league and therefore, every team. Why would any owner risk the $5-$10 BILLION asset they have in their team just for some temporary tv ratings?

There is lots more, but let's leave it at that.

1 and 5 are intertwined. Goodell couldn't rig the game without the up-front consent of the owners.

Spott 01-29-2025 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17943408)
God bless Mitch but he works for the Chiefs. Even if he didn't, he's wasting his time.

There’s a growing number of people that are firm in their beliefs that the world is flat. Despite there being nothing but evidence that the world is indeed round, they will argue blue in the face and die on the whole flat earth conspiracy. There’s no use arguing with them. You really can’t ever fix stupid and unfortunately the stupidity is growing.

smithandrew051 01-29-2025 08:38 AM

People who don’t like the Chiefs should probably spend their lives in prison in the most inhumane conditions imaginable.

It’s only fair at this point.

ReynardMuldrake 01-29-2025 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizzou_8541 (Post 17943343)
I know this is supposed to be about the media crying, but this chick has it figured out:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">And this will explain the haters <a href="https://t.co/ZdbR3Sm9iC">pic.twitter.com/ZdbR3Sm9iC</a></p>&mdash; AmericanGrl (@AZclinicalRN) <a href="https://twitter.com/AZclinicalRN/status/1884450082881216943?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 29, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Is that really a bias, though? There can only be one championship winner. That's zero sum, by definition. Everyone else loses.

htismaqe 01-29-2025 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 17943420)
There’s a growing number of people that are firm in their beliefs that the world is flat. Despite there being nothing but evidence that the world is indeed round, they will argue blue in the face and die on the whole flat earth conspiracy. There’s no use arguing with them. You really can’t ever fix stupid and unfortunately the stupidity is growing.

Yeah, no. Flat earthers are a loud, but tiny, segment of the population. We are talking about practical mass delusions here.

50 million people watched the AFC championship game.

staylor26 01-29-2025 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReynardMuldrake (Post 17943428)
Is that really a bias, though? There can only be one championship winner. That's zero sum, by definition. Everyone else loses.

It's referring to the loser's bias.

Wallcrawler 01-29-2025 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17943408)
God bless Mitch but he works for the Chiefs. Even if he didn't, he's wasting his time.

Still, Jesus **** that number is insane. A third of your points were aided by a drive extending penalty?

They did play a lot of trash this season, so it stands to reason.

It's hilarious to me that playing mistake free football in the biggest games is now some sort of scarlet letter that automatically means you're cheating to win.

So unless the Chiefs play like the Raiders, rack up a couple hundred penalty yards and THEN win the game, it's rigged.

nicksdad 01-29-2025 09:05 AM

It is more “scarcity mentality “ than zero sum bias . SM is the idea that there is limited (fill in the blank) success . So if the chiefs are successful my team can’t be . It is like that relative who isn’t really happy when something good happens to your family or one of your kids —— because that leaves less success , happiness etc for their family/ kids . ****ed up way to go through life


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.