Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8577450)

People need to understand what a sunk cost is, accept certain players as sunk costs, and deal with it.

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8577452)

I really like what we are doing too. We have skill players all over our defense and we have skill players all over our offense... minus the QB spot. But outside of Tannehill, nothing here impresses me much more than Stanzi. Couple this draft with what we have in place, and all of the pieces are there... when we get the QB. That may have to be next year unless Stanzi/Quinn can come to the rescue... and one of them just might.

Originally Posted by chiefs1111 (Post 8577465)

Jarius Wright to the Vikes. wish the Chiefs had taken him instead if they were gonna go WR

Originally Posted by DBOSHO (Post 8577429)

Desean jackson. Greg jennings.

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8577460)

I'm not pissed at the draft, all the picks make some sense and can be rationalized. We're not blowing it out of the water, though, like those teams. Our draft in 3 years could look great but right now I'd give it a C+. What we do in round 5 could bump it up to a B-.

Originally Posted by chiefs1111 (Post 8577465)

Jarius Wright to the Vikes. wish the Chiefs had taken him instead if they were gonna go WR

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 8577460)

I'm not pissed at the draft, all the picks make some sense and can be rationalized. We're not blowing it out of the water, though, like those teams. Our draft in 3 years could look great but right now I'd give it a C+. What we do in round 5 could bump it up to a B-.

Originally Posted by DTLB58 (Post 8577478)

McNutt

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 8577473)

Skins on the clock. Take another QB!

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 8577480)

Everybody seems to be thrilled with Pittsburgh's draft over in that thread. What exactly did Pittsburgh do defferently that we did other that take names that were more recoginzable?