Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16713498)

So if it doesn't pass with a 24 owner supermajority we just hold #1 and HFA. Neat.

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16713503)

LMAO Yes, the Chiefs got ****ed by gaining control of the bye.

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16713516)

I don't know....something that would make the team play worse or not have a free win by way of the bye?

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 16713517)

If you think it is not a screwing to lose the ability to have the AFCG at Arrowhead, then you need to reevaluate your thinking processes. Especially when the Bills or Bengals are exempt from those same neutral site possibilities.

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 16713484)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Why are the owners voting on the proposed solution to the cancellation of Bills-Bengals? Because the steps being suggested conflict with the plain terms of the NFL&#39;s 2002 policy manual regarding canceled games. <a href="https://t.co/GYAob3nhIP">https://t.co/GYAob3nhIP</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1611202600929529858?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Having to make up new rules to screw the Chiefs over.

Originally Posted by jerryaldini (Post 16713524)

Yes agree with all this. Biggest impact I see is making Cinci go to Buffalo, because I definitely think Cinci wins on a neutral. Shouldn't that be on a neutral since Cinci coulda had the 2? Maybe benefits us cause I'd rather play Bills.

Originally Posted by jerryaldini (Post 16713524)

Yes agree with all this. Biggest impact I see is making Cinci go to Buffalo, because I definitely think Cinci wins on a neutral. Shouldn't that be on a neutral since Cinci coulda had the 2? Maybe benefits us cause I'd rather play Bills.

Originally Posted by MahomesMagic (Post 16713505)

This latest update actually addresses my earlier concern that the Bengals would get a neutral site in AFC Championship game even if we won.

I don't think Buffalo will make it to the game anyway so I would be fine with this.

Originally Posted by HC_Chief (Post 16713528)

JFC this is dumb.
NFL had to overcomplicate everything because feelings.

Bills & Bungles decided not to play. Fine, no contest, you both forfeit the game. No W, no L, no T... you get nothing. We go to winning %, as the rules stipulate, and nothing else changes.

Bills decided not to play, Bungles still wanted the game... fine. Bungles get the W, Bills forfeit and get the L. Nothing changes.

NFL: hold my beer.

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16713533)

I am stickler for rules and these were plain as day.

We just need to make sure we win on Sunday and in the divisional road before we start bitching a fit

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 16713536)

Wtf should they get a neutral site? They got a free pass by being handed a bye and playing 1 less game than everyone else


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16712972)

fify

Originally Posted by Stryker (Post 16713474)

So, since the cards lay as they may (I still think it's BS - Bills/Bengals could have still been played IMHO) we are the #1 seed. Neutral ground or not, WE can win and move on to the SB. So my ? is this, IF the CHIEFS advance to the SB, who do you want them to face? Eagles, 49er's, other? Actually trying to stay positive for this season. :thumb:

Originally Posted by Razaele (Post 16713538)

It isn’t that complicated. Move the playoffs back a week. No bye week before Super Bowl. There’s a week where the Bills and Bengos play alone on Sunday at noon and no other Calvinball is necessary