ChiefsPlanet - Royals *** Official 2016 Royals Offseason Repository ***

If you strip all the bullshit away from this story and get it down to its core, it's basically a team telling a player that he can't have his kid in the clubhouse everyday. Unless there is specific language in LaRoche's contract stating that he can, and if there was he would be contesting this as a breach of contract, then all the other players, Sale included, need to shut the **** about it and play baseball.

I don't give a shit what Williams told them. Maybe there were three different versions because three different groups complained about the kid being there.

According to Sale, it's in his contract

BigCatDaddy

03-19-2016 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 12139596)

What media called them flukes? Or one year wonders?

Pretty much everyone on ESPN and MLB TV.

BigCatDaddy

03-19-2016 08:30 AM

I bet they would have won more games without the kid.

LoneWolf

03-19-2016 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 12139598)

According to Sale, it's in his contract

Sale is wrong according to everything else I've read. LaRoche himself even says "it was part of the discussion" when he signed with the White Sox. Weekly blowjobs from Salma Hayek were "part of the discussion" during my last salary negotiation, but it's not in writing so Salma is off the hook, at least until my next contract negotiation. :D

WilliamTheIrish

03-19-2016 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12139602)

Pretty much everyone on ESPN and MLB TV.

Interesting and untrue.

BigCatDaddy

03-19-2016 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 12140019)

Interesting and untrue.

They sure didnt predict them to be back

http://espn.go.com/mlb/preview15/sto...015-mlb-season

Deberg_1990

03-19-2016 05:37 PM

Royals got crushed at the Alamodome today. But it was sweet watching Hosmer and Salvy crush back to back HRs.

Didnt even need the short porch in right.

siberian khatru

03-20-2016 01:37 PM

Reminder that Royals vs Cubs are on MLB Network at 4 ET/3 CT.

Ian Kennedy starts for KC.

duncan_idaho

03-20-2016 03:15 PM

*** Official 2016 Royals Offseason Repository ***

Haven't seen every ST game, obviously, but I've been impressed by Rey Fuentes when I've seen him play.
He seems like a really useful 4th OF

KChiefs1

03-20-2016 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 12141855)

Haven't seen every ST game, obviously, but I've been impressed by Rey Fuentes when I've seen him play.
He seems like a really useful 4th OF

Me too but does he have a chance to make the 25 man?

siberian khatru

03-20-2016 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12142300)

Me too but does he have a chance to make the 25 man?

For the first two weeks? Absolutely.

Mama Hip Rockets

03-20-2016 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 12139596)

What media called them flukes? Or one year wonders?

Pretty much everybody in the media picked them to lose the division last year.

BigCatDaddy

03-20-2016 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurman merman (Post 12142394)

Pretty much everybody in the media picked them to lose the division last year.

Yep. Only 2 of the 15 ESPN guys I linked picked them to win the division in 15.

tk13	03-20-2016 11:29 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="es" dir="ltr">Hochevar, Soria, Wade & Herrera's combined Cactus League numbers:<br>23 IP, 13 H, 1 ER, 4 BB, 22 K. (0.39 ERA)<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Royals?src=hash">#Royals</a></p>— Josh Vernier (@JoshVernier610) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoshVernier610/status/711679473091874816">March 20, 2016</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

-King-

03-21-2016 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 12142603)

That'll do pig.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 AM.

Page 252 of 279