ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Marcus Peters traded to Rams

It's got an awful lot to do with your MOM! The whole league tampered with her and now everyone has to get vaccinated for all kinds of shit. It's just a huge mess!

Do you have a press release on all the diseases yet???

MeatRock

02-25-2018 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13438336)

Teams aren't permitted to talk to a players agent prior to the beginning of the legal tampering period. It's the rule.

Correct, but teams are allowed to discuss trades and compensation with other teams during this period. The NFL front office is just clamping down on teams releasing this information until it can become official.

BryanBusby

02-25-2018 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13438341)

not from what I saw, Proof source?

You're missing a key element. Technically they can't execute the trade anytime soon, so by NFL rules they can't grant the Redskins a small window.

cooper barrett

02-25-2018 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 13438343)

Do you have a press release on all the diseases yet???

March 14 4pm EST

BryanBusby

02-25-2018 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 13438344)

Sure, but that period has yet to begin.

BlackOp

02-25-2018 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CapsLockKey (Post 13438279)

Why is the Peters deal so top secret yet the details of Smith's contact extension with Washington public knowledge? Would that not be tampering by the Redskins since Chiefs still own his rights until the league year opens?

It's exactly the same same scenario...which is why this whole secrecy/"only one team interested" is sketchy as ****.

Rams have a 3 billion dollar stadium in the works...and the NFL needs them to succeed. KC plays LA in Mexico this year...you get the picture.

There is only one financial team in the NFL...and it's divided into 32 parts. Hunt handing over Peters to LA (20 million people) is actually beneficial to him.

Trying to sell that no team is interested in Peters is total dogshit. "we've been shopping him for 3 weeks"...yeah right.

Hog's Gone Fishin

02-25-2018 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 13438343)

Do you have a press release on all the diseases yet???

No, it's going to take some time. A LOT of time. It's extensive!

Kman34

02-25-2018 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13438348)

March 14 4pm EST

Thanks...

bigjosh

02-25-2018 10:43 PM

Terez said at best "value of a second" That could be two 3rds at best.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Been digging on potential Peters compensation. Spoke to multiple NFL executives. My guess? Second-round value at best. Chiefs have been trying to move him for three-plus weeks, but it sounds like teams didn't know how he’d acclimate into their culture with a looming payday. <a href="https://t.co/1Fb9wxx5y0">https://t.co/1Fb9wxx5y0</a></p>— Terez A. Paylor (@TerezPaylor) <a href="https://twitter.com/TerezPaylor/status/967879413617561601?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 25, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

cooper barrett

02-25-2018 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 13438347)

You're missing a key element. Technically they can't execute the trade anytime soon, so by NFL rules they can't grant the Redskins a small window.

Disagree, Why do I disagree? Because it's the NFL and if Chiefs broke a rule, 31 owners would start crying like baby's... I am sure after Maclin, they dot the i's and cross the t's.

BossChief

02-25-2018 10:45 PM

“My guess?”

cooper barrett

02-25-2018 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 13438356)

Thanks...

According to rules you can get treatment now, you just can't tell the health department who gave it to you....ROFLROFL

dirk digler

02-25-2018 10:48 PM

Let's break it down:

1. Teams can talk and agree on trades during this "dead period"
2. The trades during this "dead period" aren't official and either team can back out
3. Teams can't talk about said trade publicly
4. The player(s) involved can

Quote:

http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/p...l-was-possible

Well, answer the question! How could this happen in January?
Officially, it really didn't.

Really?
Really. The first moment NFL teams can consummate a trade is 4 p.m. ET on March 14.

Uh, you might want to check the headlines on ESPN.
I didn't say it was the first moment teams could discuss trades. It's perfectly legal, and more common than you might realize, for teams to exchange ideas about potential deals in the days, weeks and even months leading up to the official start of the trading period. The only thing they can't do is finalize the paperwork. That means neither team can discuss it publicly, but there's nothing stopping Smith from doing so.

BryanBusby

02-25-2018 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cooper barrett (Post 13438359)

Disagree, Why do I disagree? Because it's the NFL and if Chiefs broke a rule, 31 owners would start crying like baby's... I am sure after Maclin, they dot the i's and cross the t's.

Basically it goes like this.

The rules give teams a very small window for tampering before FA begins, but teams tamper around the clock unofficially.

They act like it doesn't take place while their own media arm reports on it and will only act on it if someone bitches. Chip Kelly whined like a bitch and Troy Vincent is still throbbing over Andy, so they got got. The whole wink wink system until we feel like slamming the book on someone is dumb and a reason why the NFL can be real dumb.

Their own rules are a cluster **** and contradicts itself constantly.

KChiefs1

02-25-2018 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 13438364)

I hope the Chiefs back out of it.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 PM.

Page 259 of 283