ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports NBA Off-season 2016 thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=300473)

RunKC 07-05-2016 10:25 PM

If KD stayed they would have signed Horford, but Horford knew KD was gone.
KD, Westbrook, Horford, Adams, Olidipo. One hell of a starting lineup.

Would have been awesome to see that team battle the Warriors, but nope. Now it's the Warriors and Cavs and the Spurs 500 ft below them as the next best team.

NWTF 07-05-2016 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 12302404)
It sounds like Wade is going to Cleveland.

I read they were "talking", but Cleveland cant match what Wade wants. Unless of course Wade takes less, but they are calling it a long shot at this point.

Pitt Gorilla 07-05-2016 10:27 PM

Were folks as salty when LMA went to the Spurs?

New World Order 07-05-2016 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NWTF (Post 12302448)
I read they were "talking", but Cleveland cant match what Wade wants. Unless of course Wade takes less, but they are calling it a long shot at this point.


Someone associated with the Cavs announcer said it was 'a done deal.'

Who knows at this point.

KC_Connection 07-05-2016 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 12302452)
Were folks as salty when LMA went to the Spurs?

Aldridge is basically Chris Bosh/Kevin Love...except worse. Nobody cared.

KC_Connection 07-05-2016 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 12302303)
I wasnt impressed with him at all for the majority of the playoffs. Alot of his assists are just a product of the system they run and having the two best shooters of all time. Still good player, but no way in hell a top 5 guy. Top 17 Id say.

Could very well be the best defensive player in the league. And the system helps all of them, but you need to have superb court vision and a very high BBIQ to play that role that he does in that offense. The fact that he's also improved his shot to become a well above average 3PT shooter (38.8%) is also enormously helpful.

RealSNR 07-05-2016 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 12302436)
They do not. That is ridiculous.

It's a chance with KAT. He's that damn good.

Not saying it will happen, but very quickly people are going to start talking about him as a top 5 NBA player the way they do Anthony Davis.

And KAT is going to be better than Anthony Davis.

KC_Connection 07-05-2016 11:26 PM

I'd care a lot more about the Wade rumors if he was still in his 20s and his knees weren't completely gone. He could still probably manage to be a good role player on a contender, but acquiring him now would be kind of like the Nets acquiring Paul Pierce a few years back.

Pasta Little Brioni 07-05-2016 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 12302411)
The Wolves aren't potential.

They're a legitimate threat in two years.

They're like the Thunder prior to 2009 that everybody knew was going to rape faces. Except they have the chance to be even better.

ROFL

chiefzilla1501 07-06-2016 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NWTF (Post 12302448)
I read they were "talking", but Cleveland cant match what Wade wants. Unless of course Wade takes less, but they are calling it a long shot at this point.

I think the Cavs will trade someone like shumpert. It also wouldn't surprise me if lebron took a massive paycut. He can afford to take a 1 year haircut given his enormous endorsement earnings. But what I'd really like is to trade love and get a little value back.

PAChiefsGuy 07-06-2016 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 12302317)
I bet the Warriors don't finish with a better record, and that the Cavs win it again.

Why? The Warriors finished 73-9 last year and lost in Gm 7 to the Cavs. They just added a top 5 NBA player and the Cavs have done what exactly?

I'm not a fan of either team but lets be realistic here. Warriors will more than likely destroy any team they face in the playoffs if they are healthy.

Stop Curry, there's Durant, stop Durant (and stopping Curry AND Durant is going to be nearly impossible), there's Klay, Stop Klay, there's Green.. Also, they still have a decent bench..

Ha! Good luck Cavs...

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12302495)
Aldridge is basically Chris Bosh/Kevin Love...except worse. Nobody cared.

He's not worse than those two, he is pretty much just as good if not a little better.

RobBlake 07-06-2016 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 12302505)
I'd care a lot more about the Wade rumors if he was still in his 20s and his knees weren't completely gone. He could still probably manage to be a good role player on a contender, but acquiring him now would be kind of like the Nets acquiring Paul Pierce a few years back.

if it was wade in his 20s then i honestly wouldn't care if durant was on the warriors. I'd go all in on a Wade/Irving/James lineup

chiefzilla1501 07-06-2016 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobBlake (Post 12302522)
if it was wade in his 20s then i honestly wouldn't care if durant was on the warriors. I'd go all in on a Wade/Irving/James lineup

I'm torn on this. I like the fit better than love. And I'm assuming playoff Wade will be back. And that version of Wade was spectacular last year.
But Wade is a volume shooter and not a strong defender so I'm not really sure how the three make it work, let alone if love is in the lineup. The Cavs barely made multiple iso players work against gs last year.

'Hamas' Jenkins 07-06-2016 12:54 AM

If the Cavs traded Love (unlikely), they would need to recoup two pieces. One would be a stretch 4. The other would need to be an athletic wing or rangy five.

I don't see them being able to do that. Additionally, they will be a landing spot for post-buyout vets or league minimum guys chasing a ring. There is value in that.

PAChiefsGuy 07-06-2016 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 12302524)
If the Cavs traded Love (unlikely), they would need to recoup two pieces. One would be a stretch 4. The other would need to be an athletic wing or rangy five.

I don't see them being able to do that. Additionally, they will be a landing spot for post-buyout vets or league minimum guys chasing a ring. There is value in that.

It's going to be extremely hard to beat the Warriors. Just too much firepower for any one team to beat IMO.

It's almost unfair which is why this signing is bad for the NBA... It's starting to set a bad trend and I don't like it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.