![]() |
Quote:
|
Kim Mulkey is an objectively awful human being.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It’ll actually be interesting to see if paying players moves the needle. It means nothing to the nba where pros dominate sponsorships. But college women’s bball is undoubtedly more popular than the wnba and it seems more popular than ever. Part of caitlin Clark’s recent fame is because she’s well marketed. You wonder if that carries through to the wnba even just a little bit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Oooof this thread did deliver... Not what some where expecting but wow
|
Quote:
Regarding the popularity of women's basketball, is it more popular? Or was it a product of the tournament ala the World Cup? Perhaps it is more popular than the WNBA. |
Quote:
|
This thread is a perfect example as to why the offseason on this Board sucks.....o:-)
|
Quote:
It does seem like college women’s bball is surging. I don’t think it’s even a question it’s more popular than the wnba. It seems with women’s sports interest peaks in college then plummets in the pros. That includes a uswnt that has wild popularity but has struggled to find interest in a women’s pro soccer league that features the same players. I think a lot of that has to do with the tournament style of play but it also helps that ESPN is in the SECs back pocket and they’ve been pushing hard for women’s sports like softball and college bball. Even they seem to recognize that money is to be made in women’s college but not in the pros. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also…before this happened. Quote:
|
Clarke will make Millions on her NIL, because of her play and personality.
No one will remember Angel Reese's name in 3 months. I wish the Hawks would have won, and while there are head-scratchers from the game, when you lose by that many you have to credit the performance of the other team. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.