Haha

Can we get ARROW2 and petegeegzz to calculate these odds?

Neutral site proposal? What a ****ing joke. Play it in Dallas if that’s the case.

I'd just rather they actually follow their own rules without changing them a week before the playoffs, regardless of what we were given.

And actually, yeah, I really wanted to watch that Bills/Bengals game too.

I think it's pretty obvious what he meant though dude. I'm pretty sure he understands that it doesn't benefit any particular team.

You're just getting caught up in the semantics, because you're too busy simping for the Bills.

Neutral site is similar to college conference title games, not too bad. Bye week & setting up Buffalo/Cincy to beat each other is pretty huge. But KC has to beat the Raiders first. That won’t be easy.

Lets look live at the NFL locker room as a guy nobody has ever heard of on the internet has declared boldly he has lost respect for the team.

The shock waves from this devastating turn will be heard for a while.

So it sounds like the Bengals are now locked in at the 3 seed. They cannot get the 1 seed, which of the three teams, are the only ones with that limit. I don't see a path to the 2 seed for them either. If we lose and they win they still have one less victory so we are still ahead.

For the Bills to get the 1 seed they need us to lose and they win, now no longer having to worry about the Bengals outcome which would have been the case had they lost (and same as forfeiting) which is something I posted about earlier. The Bills actually had better potential outcomes by not playing the game with more to lose by playing it and I believe that motivated them to not try getting the game in.

I would imagine it has something to do with 1/ Tom Brady; 2/ the fact it had happened 2 times in 4 seasons; and 3/ the greatest playoff game/ending ever seen in large part decided by a coin toss*.

*I am aware the Chiefs/Patriots playoff game was pretty great too but it wasn’t the same clash of titans and there was Tom Brady

Raiders always check out in the last week when they have nothing to play for. We just need to get up a couple scores and they'll pack it in.

Undermines the entire point of playing 68 quarters of football for a full season for the rest of the league.

LMAO

You're such a ****ing simp.

It's because it happened to the Bills against the Chiefs. Nobody gave a single **** about it when it happened to the Chiefs. When it happened to the Bills, people acted like it was the first time they even heard of the rule. There was an entire movement through the media and fans to change it. That's why something got done.

The Chiefs haven’t been hurt here as much as the Bengals have, but it’s still nonsense that the Bills refusing to resume the game under any circumstances could get a road AFCCG for them moved to a neutral site.

Clark Hunt
Mike Brown
Jerry Jones

Those three are definitely on board.

Andy has pull in Jacksonville and Philadelphia.

Add Shahid Khan and Jeffrey Lurie.

Clark is PROBABLY in tight with Janice McNair (Texas ties) and Stephen Ross in Houston and Miami, especially after we dealt them Tyreek. Ross hates Buffalo. So does Woody Johnson in New York with the Jets.

That's eight.

Who's left? Snyder hates the league, the Hunts and Rooneys go way back. The Bucs, the 49ers? They owe us for 31-9 and...Joe Montana? Dunno.

The question is if they WANT to block it. If they want to, they can.

Yup, that’s exactly what I’m doing.

He’s saying the NFL is changing things to accommodate the Bills and points to today’s ruling in conjunction with the change to the OT rules as proof.

I’m making that up.

There's no competitive reason for Clark to not vote against it. Mights as well. Nothing to lose only potential gain.