keg in kc |
01-09-2010 06:05 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox
(Post 6428053)
I (obviously) disagree. You won't know but you can see the potential there (mechanics, accuracy, decision making, leadership).
|
Which is why I was okay taking him in the 20s. That's the range (in my mind) for a crazy gamble on an unproven quarterback. Not the top 5. You don't draft projects that high, you draft the highest percentage at a sure thing you can find. I mean, hell, junior quarterbacks in general are a massive risk in the draft, much less one that hasn't played very much.
Anyway, I understand your opinion and respect it, just explaining my own. Like I said, I'm not anti-Sanchez, I just think think it's generally wiser to be more...traditional where draft picks are concerned, particularly with a high pick.
|