I used to laugh when people would say “these young QBs are just going to be taking turns winning Super Bowls.”

No, that was never going to happen. It never does.

1 guy wins a bunch. 1 guy will win 2. The rest are lucky to win 1.

That’s how it goes. That’s how it always happens. There’s a dynasty in every decade and another team will win a couple. The rest get spread out.

Of course he did. Then on a random Wednesday when you want some kid snuggles it will be mom only.

Josh Allen is going to make it. Really don't think Jackson will in large part because that Ravens team can't help but shit itself at critical moments.

I pulled it up on YouTubeTV. Have the game saved. They played it I think once while it was being reviewed.

Happened in back to back years now. The Chiefs and Bills both turtled to the extreme and let the Ravens eventually implode on their own, and it worked both times.

You telling me Lamar Jackson can’t win if he doesn’t get an early lead?

And lets not forget the NFC is participating also. Burrow beat Mahomes and got housed by the Rams.

When Jackson can't run anymore he's just done.

He has one throwing mechanic that works. He has one TYPE of throw he excels at (those sort of lofted passes into empty zones). He doesn't do a lot pre-snap and doesn't diagnose terribly well.

When teams don't have to spy anymore because of his legs or when they can actually put a true pass rush out there against him, he's shot.

Now the wrinkle with Jackson may just be that the guys legs could well hold up to 35 years old. He's THAT damn explosive. He could have that sort of Steve Smith arc where his legs just refuse to go away on him. In which case he may have 6-8 premier years still.

But I think he's already started to slow up a bit. He's been caught from behind more times in the last 2 years than he did the 5 years before that. He doesn't seem quite as big a risk to truly break one anymore.

He can't lose MUCH more than he already has and remain a premier QB.

As for Allen - he's REALLY smart pre-snap. I mean yeah, he gacked that 4th down, but as a rule he's very good at diagnosing and attacking blitz schemes and that's why he's given Spags more trouble than anyone else.

And Burrow's style seems to be the one that should age the best but the injury issues seem to always be lingering in the background. He's had significant leg AND arm injuries. That's a concern.

Like I said, giving them all 10 more years is probably optimistic. And even at that...well like I said, the math is starting to look kinda rough for them.

Allen is likely to be the Big Ben to Mahomes Brady.

He'll get one. May well get 2. He's just too damn good and that organization, while not as good as ours, is one of the 5 best in the game.

They'll get one at some point.

(But gat DAYUM it would be funny if they didn't...)

It also fails to account for the fact that new QBs will be coming into the league every year and they will be in contention too.

Am I crazy for thinking Stafford will be the Big Ben (even though he’s older than Mahomes)?

He has one during the Mahomes years already and the Rams feel like a team that could win it next year.

There’s no way Pat didn’t suffer a concussion in that game.

To this day, I’ve still never seen a player go from being as dialed in and sharp as he was at the start of that game to as clueless and lost as he was by the end of it.

It was truly baffling.

He's in the NFC.

I think Stafford is more Drew Brees.

A guy who needed to change teams to find his peak. Who was probably always a little better than he got credit for. Who won one at/near the end of his prime and was a scary proposition in the post-season even as he aged.

I don't think they'll win another one.

THANK YOU! I was about to go out of my mind. This morning I even looked to see if someone had posted the whole game yet on YT, and NFL had BUT, to help cut down on the time they cut all of the review time - and therefore the replays shown - out. I just threw my hands up and was starting to wonder if I had just imagined the whole thing.

It certainly is not as definitive as I remember thinking it was at the time, but it is still a better shot than either of the field side views and throws more than enough doubt on his reaching the LoG. This whole controversy is stupid. “But the one side judge spotted the ball on the line!” **** off.