![]() |
I'm glad the broncos have something to play for. I think we'll start Humphries and it will be a real test if he's good enough to start the playoffs
|
This big palooka had a full practice today. I have almost given up on him for this year so here's hoping he surprises me.
|
Quote:
|
I think the line will be DJ, Thuney, Creed, Smith, and Morris to start the game for a drive or two… Then the backups will get in.. Want Kingsley to get some time at either tackle side too..
|
I think if he shows up against Bonitto, he’ll start throughout the playoffs. Obviously that is the best case scenario.
|
No reason at all to move Thuney off LT, but Wanya should be in at LG. I think that's the best line combination.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I know you guys don’t want to hear this but if that hammy is healthy he’s a way better tackle than Thuney. AND that’s not a bad thing or Thuney slander. If healthy he should take the job. The goal is the best 5.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And I'm willing to even get to "he's not a better OT than Thuney but he's not a WORSE one" for the sake of argument. Because even THAT is a no-brainer. Because Thuney is a much much MUCH better OG than Caliendo. Shit man, Humphries can be 10% worse than Thuney at OT and the offensive line is better with Humphries at OT and Thuney at OG than it is with Thuney/Caliendo. I just don't understand the push-back here. Let the guy play and see what he can do against a NASTY and motivated Broncos front with Nick Bonitto ready to lay it all out there. If he performs, start him in the playoffs. If he doesn't, you don't. I just don't even see any value in coming up with alternate scenarios here. Because they all require a complete and total suspension of disbelief. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bonitto wrecked Kingsley in the last game, so it will be interesting to see how Humphries fares against an athletic pass rusher.
|
Quote:
|
Play Humphries vs. dungver...if he does an acceptable job, start him vs whomever we play in the 2nd round, and if he doesn't play well in that game, return to Thuney at LT.
Or ask Patrick, and do whatever he prefers. A happy Patrick is the best Patrick. |
It's so funny how folks are so absolute with things. We see Thuney have a few decent games at LT after being protected by TE's and RB's blocking, plus Pat getting the ball out quickly, and all of a sudden "we'd be crazy to change things". But those folks are missing the bigger picture. The run game has suffered massively and in the playoffs you can bet your house that defenses will have way more stunts and pressures ready to exploit Thuney and Caliendo.
So imo we should all be praying that DJ has a solid game against Denver and leaves the field with health and confidence. Because if he's good to go I think it could make this offense even better than it was over the last two games. Cause we can't go into the playoffs with our run game having limitations. We just can't. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. Like it or not, the Chiefs are at their absolute best when the offense is moving the ball in the air. The scheme shift the last two weeks has led to more points, longer and more sucerssful drives. 2. Lets be honest about the running backs for a second. The Chiefs have rode the shit out of Hunt. Dude has been amazing, but we have demanded a ton out of the guy. Its important to make sure he's fresh for the playoffs. Pop is coming back from a leg injruy. Again, we accomp0lished everything we wanted to accomplish by securing the #1 seed. Its more important to make sure Pop is ready for the playoffs than running the damn ball up and down the field. 3. It was important to get the passing offense in rythem. Which they have accomplished. 4. Running game sucked in Cleveland. 26 carries for 77 yards. Thats a good defense. Pops first game back. 1st game with Thuney at LT and Caliendo at G. The number of carries in the next game against the Texansd was 20, vs the Steelers it was 15. I don't think there is a reason to sound the alarm regarding guard play in the running game when Andy (for good reason) has lighted the load for the backs due to overuse and injury. In conclusion. The games vs the Steelers and Texans where the tune up for the playoffs, especially as the passing game goes. I don't think Andy is going to insert an unknow variable (DJ) into the Oline mix unless he's forced to do it. They went to Thuney when they did because they needed to figure out the offense for the playoffs. You can't be figuring shit out when the loser goes home. |
In every Super Bowl run we’ve had in the Mahomes era we’ve had to lean on the run in at least one of our playoff wins on the way. In Super Bowl 54 and 57, sticking with the run was a big reason we won.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you mean Morris? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Morris tweaked his knee and had to come out. And Kinglsey less shit the bed than he showed a real spammable tendency against speed. He was actually pretty credible against Denvers other DE (don't recall who it was) but Nick Bonitto ****ed his mom and wiped his dick on her drapes. He was just wrecking the guy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This team is a pass first offense…particularly in the playoffs. And there is no doubt that the offense has finally found their groove in the passing game last 2 weeks with Thuney at LT. Sure, Let big Hump see what he can do this weekend. But, don’t fix what ain’t broke. If Hump doesn’t shred any doubt that he upgrades the overall line play, then Thuney is the playoff LT. |
That's just the thing - it's still broken.
Thuney at LT is better than it was but the guy is getting a lot of help and still giving up a good amount of pressures. We need better than that in the playoffs or it's gonna be a long slog. |
Quote:
Don't get me wrong. I thought it it was a great signing. I had extremely high hopes. I understand what he was asked to do was incredibly difficult for a player coming back from injury. And honestly, had he been able to come in start and finish that game with the Chargers, and hold down the job, I'd be his biggest advocate. I'm rooting for the kid. I really am, but his opportunity to contribute in the playoffs was severely hampered by not holding up when he got his opportunity. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're sending him out there against Bonitto in a must-win game for Denver as a trial by fire. If he performs, play him. If he doesn't, don't. Nobody is saying keep him out with the rest of the starters this week and drop him into the divisional game. We're saying that all Thuney has done is give us a workable floor - the ceiling still depends on Humphries being an effective LT as it will help us in both the pass game AND the run game. |
I'm all for playing him against the Broncos.
The problem is he's not going to be playing with Mahomes or next to Thuney at guard. Seeing him go out there and hold up well vs Bonitto is important, and so is his ability to play the entire game. I trust Reid and his coaches on this. Whatever they decide I'll be fine with. |
Quote:
|
If they didnt think he could play this season, they wouldn't have signed him. His ACL checked out. It had to because they're not about to re-sign him at this point.
|
Quote:
I mean Reid ain't gonna have these guys sitting at home watching their stories and eating chocolate bon bons. They're gonna be working hard in practice BECAUSE they don't have a game. And they'll be able to get some of that ironed out pretty easily, IMO. Again - not rookies. These are all experienced veteran players. And there truly is a 'right' way to play these positions. Thuney is a well-known technician; as set and forget as they come at OG. So playing alongside him isn't a matter of learning anything new - it's realizing that you just have to focus on YOUR portion and Thuney's got the rest on lock. Asking Humphries to learn how to play with Thuney is a HELL of a lot easier than asking Thuney to learn to play alongside Caliendo because Thuney is the throughput at a position that he knows like the back of his hand. There's just nothing complicated about playing next to him. If Humphries appears physically sound and has used the last few weeks to learn the offense, there's no reason at all to expect problems between the two. Again, Cam Robinson hit the ground at full speed in Minnesota. Humphries is a very similar caliber player with very similar experience. If he's healthy and ready for game speed, we'll know it Sunday. And if that's the case, he's going to be fine. |
Not a big surprise but Reid says DJ is starting this week.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">“There’s a good chance” D.J. Humphries starts at left tackle on Sunday, per Coach Reid.</p>— Matt McMullen (@KCChiefs_Matt) <a href="https://twitter.com/KCChiefs_Matt/status/1875257748050604505?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
What’s the starting oline look like? DJ, Caliendo, creed, smith, morris? I’d like to see how Morris does at RT also.
|
Quote:
The Chiefs have to be somewhat careful, they can't just throw Carson Wentz out there to be brutally murdered by a division rival who needs a win to clinch the playoffs. Going to have to leave a few decent guys in there. |
Taylor is listed as out for the game so somebody new will be playing RT.
|
Wonder if they'll split reps between Morris and Suamataia. See what they've got there.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We are gonna get a lot of answers. Again, if Wanya continues to look good at RT like he did in the Texans game, you have to really consider him replacing Taylor in 2026. |
Quote:
Would rather try to buy another year of control at that position before I have to start paying for it. Would prefer see Kingsley take the gig. But there's a long way between now and 2026 -- they'll 'consider' any number of things between now and then. I suspect a throwaway game against Denver 2 seasons earlier isn't going to alter that calculus much. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But anyway DJ has to get through Sunday for this to really be a debate so let's just wait and see. |
Thuney didn't get as much as you think. Players lined up on his side on occasion, but they didn't always help out of that lineup position.
And this is not an argument for Thuney to start over Humphries. Just pointing out Thuney needs/gets help all the time as not being a reason for going to Humphries |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Guys lined up his side? Sure. Help though? Not so much. |
All of you Cowards, Losers, and Traitors Humphries Haters can get bent!!1
He's finally had enough time to somewhat acclimate not only to the rigors of the game, but his new system/team as well... Wentz will feel like he has guardian angels on his left Not lying you just watch, he will look more than credible |
I watched Reids press conference, and I will give all you DJ fans this, Reid is pulling for the guy. You can tell by the look in his eye. So if he plays well on Sunday, I can see it happening.
My point all along has been this. The playoffs are not the time to got with a dude at LT and then have to alter the game plan because it's not working. If that were to happen it means drives are being stopped. The offense isn't producing. Mahomes is getting hit. That leads to frustration, which leads to the offense pressing, and if have seen one thing in with this team, when they press they can go to shit. Reid will want to avoid that at all cost. And I imagine Thuney and Pat have some say in this matter too. If Thuney wants to do it, and Pat feels better with him at LT, I can't see Reid going against that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Of course Reid is pulling for the guy. He's the best chance they have of being at max strength in the playoffs. I still don't think Thuney at LT is sustainable.
|
If he looks serviceable today, you roll with him in the playoffs. It gives you the best 5 across the line in the best spots for them. This shouldn't really be a question.
|
Quote:
It'll work. He just needs to be solid - not an All pro. |
Quote:
|
They’ve played very good defenses and Thuney has looked good at LT. This is the best the line has looked by far this year and in return Mahomes looks like he used to.
Would be dumb to change it now |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If we were talking Thuney at LT and Allegretti at LG for a playoff run, I think it’s a different story. But the other piece to the equation is how average Caliendo has played. Not glaringly bad, but not good either.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Give the man some credit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And only 1 QB hit. |
The best possible scenario for the play-offs and for next season is that Humphries is good to go. It improves and stabilizes TWO positions on the line.
|
Quote:
Thuney is a stopgap. Nothing more. |
Quote:
Thuney is a much better tackle than Morris or Kingsley and it’s showing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unless Humphries looks good tomorrow, Thuney is the best option |
Quote:
When PMs release time falls below 2.5 seconds suddenly the sack figures square with the win rate. We made things incredibly difficult on both tackles all season both in terms of blocking assignments and simple scheme. Until Thuney. With Thuney we turned the sliders down quite a bit and that's what a good staff SHOULD do. It's not an indictment on Thuney - it's just a recognition that the bar that Humphries needs to clear to get in there isn't nearly as high as has been suggested. If he's simply in football shape he can absolutely play just as well as Thuney has if that's the kind of offense we continue to run. If it is, we get the added advantage of better IOL play. If it's not, Thuney couldn't run it anyway (he's getting beat up by power - can't do long developing routes if the LT is getting walked backwards). We should absolutely hope that Humphries looks good Sunday because he would help this team a lot. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.