![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here I thought I'd suffered through only 14 games...Well, I feel better now. :) |
Quote:
It's called Due Diligence. A great owner would have scoured the league for a player personnel guru like Eric DeCosta. He would have paid insane money for Chris Polian. He would have found a guy like Tom Dimitroff. He wouldn't taken a poll, found out the name of the hottest candidate and guaranteed him a five year contract. One look at Pioli's draft record should be an indication. Another indication would be that he wasn't the GM at New England. Another would be the fact that he allowed Haley to go unchecked this season and hire Clancy Pendergast, keep Tim Krumrie, cut Bernie Pollard, fire Chan Gailey the week before the season started and so on and so forth. GREAT owners, owners with RINGS on their fingers, do NOT allow their people to go UNCHECKED. Unfortunately, the Hunt family allows "their people" to go unchecked for decades at a time. |
Quote:
I'll get more specific with all kinds of gaudy stats & bold predictions to back that later... bedtime for bonzo. |
Quote:
Chris Polian was gonna succeed his dad and everyone knew it. No way he was gonna up and leave that organization. NO CHANCE. Same as Decosta. Tom Dimtroff was in charge of all those "drafts" that you hate and have labeled failures for NE. Why clamour for him anyway, he went the year before. Pioli was the executive of the decade and if we passed on him, you know as well as I do that Clark would be burned at the stake, by now, for not signing him. Its NOT Piolis draft record. Stop saying that, its not true. I dont like the guy, but be fair man...those drafts were Tom Dimitroffs. right or wrong? You are right, he wasnt the GM for NE, he was director of player personel..meaning he was in charge of trades and free agent signings..you know, the part of the machine in NE that made the ship sail so well. The part that allowed them to stay competitive over the course of a entire decade and compete for the majority of the championships of that time span. He wanted Clancy to be a position coach, which would be good for us IMHO. He was the defacto DC after no better alternative was available that fit perameters. Keeping Krummrie was a GOOD decision IMHO, letting Gibbs go wasnt. I will eternally wonder why people hate TK so badly, I think he is a very good position coach. Who has he failed to develop? He has done a fine job with about every player sent his way. I would have prefered to keep Gibbs at all costs, but if he wasnt allowed to interview with Houston and we chose a DC that wanted his own staff, it would leave us in a rough spot as far as league rep goes with how we handle our coaches. Believe me, there is a reason that Gun was allowed to leave but Krummrie was retained and we tried to keep Gibbs. I HATED cutting Pollard, but also realize he has reacted poorly to hard coaching in the past for Purdue and was suspended in college for blow ups at coaches, you simply cant have that in the NFL...should he have been cut and not just suspended as Brandon Marshall was? NO, but something needed done and we openly tried to trade him before cutting him. I will always look back at that as a monumental mistake by us that set us back another step on our journey. I also have no response for the firing of Gailey, but I also am not privy to info that was included in the decision. I seriously cant fault Clark at this point for going out and getting one of the better GMs available. |
Quote:
And who the **** are you to state that Decosta or Polian weren't "leaving"? No offense but you're in Iowa. I hardly think that YOU know what the **** was going on with Clark Hunt. |
Krumrie is garbage dude. We have arguably the worst dline in the nfl for many years running. why even bother
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
On the Coalition, we have two well known resident trolls I have chatted with for years...one is a Colts fan and the other is a Ravens fan and I couldn't dodge the endless Baltimore and Indy updates if I tried. Believe me, and if you don't I will pm you proof, I wanted either of those two before Pioli, SP was far from MY personal choice. I lobbied for both Decosta and Polian and was shown the truth through conversation that neither even contemplated leaving either team. I know plenty about both situations and there was no chance of either guy leaving. I take no offense obviously, but what does Iowa have to do with anything? How do you think YOU know what the **** is going on with Clark Hunt? Im not the one making accusations here, you are bud. I never said: "he just took a poll and hired the most popular cantidate" ...among other claims. I am simply stating facts. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
he did more than just that. cmon, really? stop acting as if you were in the room, you werent. I wasnt either, just to get that out of the way ahead of time. |
Quote:
IMHO he has played the hand given to him very well as our Dline coach. Too bad King Carl was dealin the ****ing cards back then.... |
Pioli - or any GM - would be a moron to fire a new coach after one single year. But especially the Chiefs. Between Carl Peterson and Herm Edwards, your franchise was a walking corpse. That isn't going to be fixed in one season. What Haley brought back to KC was someone on the sidelines who channelled the frustration that Chiefs fans have been feeling for at least a decade onto the field. He has been great for you guys in that respect. He cusses, he cries, he cusses some more.
He should be given at least as much time to install his program as Herm was given. He's not perfect, to be sure. Hell, who knows if he's even any good? But whatever he is, it isn't Herm Edwards. And Pioli isn't Carl Peterson. The disease that Carl installed into your franchise isn't going to go away overnight. To even ask the question about bringing Haley back shows a weakness of intellect to me. How can Whitlock not understand all the reasons why Haley should be given the opportunity to install his program? |
Quote:
Pollard was a ****ing liability. I think it was CLEAR that we HAD to go after another Safety, or two, so why keep around a guy who demeans the authority of the coaching staff? I don't mind Pollard being gone at at all. Texans with Pollard 8-8. Texans Without Pollard 8-8. Pollard is the starter on a team who has openly admitted that every other safety they had sucked beyond belief, so yeah, I'm sure they are happy to have him. I will be happy to have the guy who man's the spot in 2010. Trust me, It won't be mike Brown. As for Pioli, I'm damn glad to have him, and anyone who wasn't happy the day they signed him, just cannot be pleased unless the organization does exactly what they think should be done, Like buy the Colts, and fire Polian, because that's the only way his ass was coming to KC. I mean really. Pick players to play with Peyton Manning, or go to the Chiefs. Some people are just stupid, and just don't know it. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.