ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs listing McCluster as a WR (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227117)

Rausch 04-24-2010 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 6708168)
Tell me more Miss Cleo. I'm amazed you're already able to come to a conclusion before a player ever takes the field.

No, you're the fan of the pick.

Explain to me how adding yet another guy who's undersized and slow for the position IMPROVES the team.

Flowers did great in the 1/2 assed cover 2 and last year when Carr was slow to react in press. The greater weakness was exposed.

So we add ANOTHER short CB with low top end speed and that helps us....HOW?...

Reaper16 04-24-2010 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6708179)
I'm not sure "slot WR" is the right way to term it, if they're really looking to make him the Chiefs version of Wesley Welker (Chris Mortensen's words, not mine...). The guy has 346 catches the last 3 years.

If that's what they're shooting for, I'd call it pretty valuable.

Welker can't even be Welker without a deep threat. That doesn't bode very well for the Chiefs.

|Zach| 04-24-2010 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lostcause (Post 6708186)
The hypocrisy is stunning. For weeks the threads have been blowing up on this board about how the 'True Fan' wants an OT when we 'need' playmakers - so thus Berry needs to be the pick and to hell with the idiot True Fan. Now, we spend our 2nd rounders on playmakers, improving the offense and return game, instead of fat slobs in the middle of the line and apparently we've taken a left turn to draft hell. We added a NT in free agency - he ain't pretty or special, but you don't have to have a pretty NT to be effective. This team is better at blocking/recieving/returning and coverage then it was at 5:00 pm on thursday. And All of these rookies have the potential to contribute.

http://i39.tinypic.com/izmg4m.jpg

HotRoute 04-24-2010 01:03 AM

If he is going to be a WR what number do we suppose he will wear

DaneMcCloud 04-24-2010 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6708166)
Dane, an honest question:

Who makes more plays, a #2 WR or a slot WR?

A pass rushing OLB, or a nickel corner?

A nose tackle, or a tight end?

I know where you're trying to lead me and I can only answer like this:

Apparently, Pioli felt the value at slot was higher than the value at OLB.

Apparently, Pioli felt the value at CB/Returner was higher than that at NT.

At this point in time, I'm not going to pass judgment because the Chiefs need ALL of those positions.

And the last thing I'm going to criticize beforehand is the choice of playmakers, which is exactly what I accused him of NOT taking last year.

I'm going to let this one run its course before making a determination. If it pays off, he's almost even for last year. If it doesn't, he's dug himself an even greater hole.

keg in kc 04-24-2010 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6708185)
Randy Moss isn't walking through that door, keg.

I'm glad you're here to point these things out. I don't know what we'd ever do without you.

Mecca 04-24-2010 01:03 AM

Randy Moss has made Welkers career, why is this not grasped? Without Moss teams would just sit on Welker and wait to jump those routes.

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2010 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6708183)
They get passed on, but when you have a guy without his head up his ass like Mike Brown did you will be more successful. Let me put it this way. We beat Dallas is we have Eric Berry and Javier Arenas on our team in 2009. Shit. Nevermind. I'm glad Brown and Leggett suck ass. They allowed us to swap their asses for real football players.

And if you also give Dallas Dez Bryant do we still win that game?

DaneMcCloud 04-24-2010 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6708190)
Welker can't even be Welker without a deep threat. That doesn't bode very well for the Chiefs.


This
year.

That doesn't make him a bad choice.

Mecca 04-24-2010 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6708194)
I'm glad you're here to point these things out. I don't know what we'd ever do without you.

Uh it's a valid point, you think Welker puts anything up remotely close to what he does if he's not playing with Randy Moss?

'Hamas' Jenkins 04-24-2010 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6708193)
I know where you're trying to lead me and I can only answer like this:

Apparently, Pioli felt the value at slot was higher than the value at OLB.

Apparently, Pioli felt the value at CB/Returner was higher than that at NT.

At this point in time, I'm not going to pass judgment because the Chiefs need ALL of those positions.

And the last thing I'm going to criticize beforehand is the choice of playmakers, which is exactly what I accused him of NOT taking last year.

I'm going to let this one run its course before making a determination. If it pays off, he's almost even for last year. If it doesn't, he's dug himself an even greater hole.

"A nickel corner and return man. Chiefs are drafting backups in Round 2 this year."--Scott Wright.

Mr. Flopnuts 04-24-2010 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6708191)

LMAO That's hilarious.

Mecca 04-24-2010 01:05 AM

So McCluster will be good the day we get a deep threat like Randy Moss, ok so when McCluster is 57 years old.

|Zach| 04-24-2010 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6708197)
And if you also give Dallas Dez Bryant do we still win that game?

Did you read that thing about a Dez Bryant medical condition. I was trying to read it on my mobile at dinner but got distracted.

BryanBusby 04-24-2010 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6708200)
"A nickel corner and return man. Chiefs are drafting backups in Round 2 this year."--Scott Wright.

"Bryan Bulaga will be the Chiefs first round draft pick." --Scott Wright


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.