ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Thoughts on Preseason Game #2 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=262553)

BoneKrusher 08-19-2012 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8ers (Post 8832347)
Ol "Hot Tub" Boss played pretty good last night what I saw

he's a keeper fo sho.

Ace Gunner 08-19-2012 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 8832282)
The bigger weakness is the non existent pass rush. The DL is the weak link of the defense. Has been for years, which is why the Chiefs can look great on defense one week and next get run all over. The Rams had no problems running the ball up the middle at will. Their # 1 OL totally dominated our #1 DL. Until the Chiefs get a solid DL, the up and down play will continue. This is the reason why I couldn't understand how all off season some kept saying how awesome our defense is / was. It's only gonna be as good as the DL will let it be.

Ya, last night should be a wake up call to the "12 - 4" homers. This team is still as inconsistent without Todd Haley running it.

This was "2011 season meltdown" part II.

DJ got the dumbs again too.

BossChief 08-19-2012 10:14 AM

Some of you guys are crying over nothing.

It's the preseason.

Do you bitches think GB is in chicken little mode because they lost to the Browns like 100-5?

Peyton Manning has 0 tds and like 4 picks.

It's preaseason...we have no idea what the two teams coaching staffs wanted to get out of this game, therefore it's hard to judge anything but one on one performances in these matchups.

Especially in game two of the preseason.

Simplicity 08-19-2012 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832429)
Some of you guys are crying over nothing.

It's the preseason.

Do you bitches think GB is in chicken little mode because they lost to the Browns like 100-5?

Peyton Manning has 0 tds and like 4 picks.

It's preaseason...we have no idea what the two teams coaching staffs wanted to get out of this game, therefore it's hard to judge anything but one on one performances in these matchups.

Especially in game two of the preseason.

/thread

oh and + rep.

BossChief 08-19-2012 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8832116)
You don't move a RB that you believe is a productive RB to WR.

That 4.5 YPC is a mirage.

Handoffs on passing downs, when the defense doesn't care if the RB gains 6 or 7 yards.

For every rushing attempt he had in a worthless situation, he had one where we ran him up the middle in short yardage.

Those cancel each other out IMO.

Look, was it a good pick at 36? Probably not.

Has Dexter shown year to year improvement? Absolutely.

His routes this preaseason have been great.

Not good, GREAT.

He is getting separation on nearly every route he runs and will help us win games this year.

Pasta Little Brioni 08-19-2012 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832429)
Some of you guys are crying over nothing.

It's the preseason.

Do you bitches think GB is in chicken little mode because they lost to the Browns like 100-5?

Peyton Manning has 0 tds and like 4 picks.

It's preaseason...we have no idea what the two teams coaching staffs wanted to get out of this game, therefore it's hard to judge anything but one on one performances in these matchups.

Especially in game two of the preseason.

Were you the one that got those defensive stats for the Chiefs last 8 games last year? Can't find them anywhere.

BossChief 08-19-2012 10:33 AM

Not me.

suzzer99 08-19-2012 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning (Post 8831516)
Hey Cassel, Dexter is wide open. Better scramble. Out of your perfect pocket.

http://i.imgur.com/ANUy1.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/pzl6f.jpg

RAGE

suzzer99 08-19-2012 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8831839)
And you "talk" like a Homer-Dumbass.

If Jon Baldwin needs three seasons to prove his worth, he was a ****ing awful selection.

Well he had less than a half season of typical rookie development last year, factoring in the strike and the fact that Thomas Jones is a raging ****. Also the guy was an admitted project who had to learn a lot of nfl technique from scratch.

WilliamTheIrish 08-19-2012 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832429)
Some of you guys are crying over nothing.

It's the preseason.

Do you bitches think GB is in chicken little mode because they lost to the Browns like 100-5?

Peyton Manning has 0 tds and like 4 picks.

It's preaseason...we have no idea what the two teams coaching staffs wanted to get out of this game, therefore it's hard to judge anything but one on one performances in these matchups.

Especially in game two of the preseason.

Why would any Chiefs fan care about GB's loss? Or Manning's picks? Those two QB's have proven their worth in this league.

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 8832560)
Well he had less than a half season of typical rookie development last year, factoring in the strike and the fact that Thomas Jones is a raging ****. Also the guy was an admitted project who had to learn a lot of nfl technique from scratch.

Again, if he's a project at #21, he was a horrible selection. As I mentioned earlier, A.J. Green and Julio Jones certainly didn't need three years, nor did Baldwin's teammate, Dwayne Bowe.

Baldwin, IMO, has been disappointing to date but hopefully, that changes quickly.

BossChief 08-19-2012 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8832608)
Again, if he's a project at #21, he was a horrible selection. As I mentioned earlier, A.J. Green and Julio Jones certainly didn't need three years, nor did Baldwin's teammate, Dwayne Bowe.

Baldwin, IMO, has been disappointing to date but hopefully, that changes quickly.

He wasn't taken at 21.

Even if he was, he was well worth the risk.

His upside is an elite receiver.

suzzer99 08-19-2012 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8832608)
Again, if he's a project at #21, he was a horrible selection. As I mentioned earlier, A.J. Green and Julio Jones certainly didn't need three years, nor did Baldwin's teammate, Dwayne Bowe.

Baldwin, IMO, has been disappointing to date but hopefully, that changes quickly.

How can you compare 4th and 6th overall to a late first-rounder? AJ Green and Julio Jones weren't ever considered projects. Taking a flyer on a skill-position unpolished guy with freakish talent in the late first round is completely standard. The hope is you wind up with a guy like Green or Jones even if it takes him a year or two longer to develop.

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 8832629)
He wasn't taken at 21.

Even if he was, he was well worth the risk.

His upside is an elite receiver.

Eh, 26, whatever. There is no good reason as to why he should take three years to develop.

DaneMcCloud 08-19-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 8832638)
How can you compare 4th and 6th overall to a late first-rounder? AJ Green and Julio Jones weren't ever considered projects. Taking a flyer on a skill-position unpolished guy with freakish talent in the late first round is completely standard. The hope is you wind up with a guy like Green or Jones even if it takes him a year or two longer to develop.

Belichick compared them and said Baldwin was just as good.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.