Agreed. Solves a lot of problems. Home runs aren't exciting if all of these slugger strike out all the time. And pitchers are throwing their arms out. Also does wonders for parity because it places way more importance on defense and good bullpens.

I'd like to see the 'temporary DH' rule put in.

You get your DH for as long as your SP is in the game. It keeps that churn and burn bullpen shit from happening and thus encourages teams to have their pitchers conditioned to throw 6 or 7 innings instead of going all gas, no breaks for 5.

If pitchers are throwing at 90% for 7 innings instead of 100% for 5, they're going to give up more contact and again, more action. Now some teams will say 'hang the DH, we'll just rotate pinch hitters through and STILL have our starter go 5' but it's going to create more roster headaches at that point, especially when you've probably burned your best PH option on the DH to begin with and he's now out of the game.

Combine that with moving the fences back and reducing the shift (not necessarily eliminating it, but at least get that ****ing 2b out of the outfield) and you could do a TON for the product, IMO.

Theo Epstein said that the pitching was so good these days -- high end velocity and filthy breaking stuff combined -- that most hitters thought their best chance to succeed was to barrel the ball up and go for the long ball. I think there's some truth to that.

Nick Madrigal is an interesting study. He's considered the most extreme contact hitter in the league, making contact 92% of the time last year.

His underlying power numbers are all underwhelming, barrel rate was 1% (league average is 8%, the really good sluggers are around 12%). Ground ball rate was 60% and fly ball rate was 20%, which is unheard of in today's game.

He had a 106 OPS+ and a 112 DRC+ with this approach, which includes a 5% walk rate. I doubt the clubs reward a player with a nine-digit salary with this profile. He's still just above average. It pays to slug.

No question.

Unless/until those long fly balls that are presently homers become outs. Then the BIG power guys, the legit power hitters, will continue to get paid because that becomes a rare skill.

But these guys that are falling into 10-12 wall-scrapers a year are going to plummet in value as their OPS and OBP collapses when balls start landing in gloves. So they'll either need to figure out how to find a gap or bag groceries.

Right now there's just no reason to do anything OTHER than what these hitters are doing. It's just too hard to string hits together. Swinging early in the count and driving a single up the middle serves damn near no purpose at all. It doesn't tax the pitcher and it's gonna take 2 MORE hits to drive you in. And trying to get him over, around and in won't work because even if that happens with nobody out, SOMEBODY is going to K and you're probably going to end up stranding that runner at 3b.

To run manufacturing is damn near impossible. It's XBHs or bust. And with the shift being as aggressive as it is, not to mention small outfields, it's almost easier to hit a HR in many cases than a mere double.

Baseball's dicked up right now. And making those OFers bigger would help it a LOT.

So you are suggesting Kauffman Stadium ball

Yeah. Or Coors without the altitude. And while my first thought is "well maybe not quite that extreme..." I actually think that yeah, EXACTLY that extreme would make baseball a hell of a lot more entertaining. Chicks only digged the long-ball when it was rare. We are now firmly into 'if everybody is special, then nobody is special' territory.

When done leaguewide, it will force a change back to how the game used to be played with heightened focus on athleticism and intelligence. And there will still be room for power but it will come from truly powerful guys.

Baseball would be so much more fun if you had a whole slew of teams built like the '87 Cardinals w/ defense for days, insane speed and reasonable amounts of complementary power provided by true power hitters like Jack Clark.

Monsters like Jorge Soler will still hit the same number of bombs because when guys like him and Tatis and Ohtani him 'em, they stay hit.

But Marcus Semien hit 45 homers w/ an average distance of 388 feet. You give him Royals Stadiums dimensions (you can find overlays on this) and he'd have hit 27. That's...uh...substantial. Nick Castellanos would've dropped from 34 to 17. Ohtani would've hit 36, by contrast.

Essentially I want 30 to be the new 40, 40 to be the new 50 (remember when 50 bombs was incredible?) and so on. And a lot of these 20 HR hitters would be like 6-8 homerun hitters and I'm just fine with that. A guy like Tommy Edman who's a switch hitter with little more than dead red pull power shouldn't have 11 bombs - he should have 5 or 6. Ian Happ hit almost entirely wall-scrapers last year; guy should've had like 12 instead of 25.

Power hitters should be an exception, not the rule.

This isn't getting done today. No way.

And the MLBPA votes unanimously to decline MLBs proposal. I think it's pretty clear the owners were pushing bull shit last night.

MLBPA is a bunch of greedy ****ers.

Wanting to raise the CBT would kill the Royals so **** them all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, they’re basically hell-bent on a having a salary cap that isn’t a salary cap and the players don’t want that along with refusing to increase revenue split (I think players get 40% of revenue currently).

I don’t think we’ll have games until June or July.

Shut it down for the year.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NO DEAL. Expect ALL games through 5/1 to be cancelled at any moment. The earliest the season could start now is 5/2.

I do not EXPECT any negotiations to occur before 3/21. With fewer COVID restrictions and no spring training commitments this year, I expect the players to take advantage of their free time by attending conference and NCAA tourney games.

LMAO

There is no formal 'revenue split' between players and owners as there is in the NFL.

There's a revenue sharing pool that's comprised of a percentage of gate receipts, but that's it.

If the players would lighten up on their dogmatic refusal to back off the 'no salary cap of any kind' stance, they could actually get a HARD revenue split. And in so doing it would benefit the rank and file players a great deal more than dicking around with the luxury tax would.

That's really just going to make the top of the market players more expensive. It will do very very little to impact baseball's middle class. A hard revenue split, OTOH, would.