![]() |
Quote:
We shit on that dude so quickly on the basis of the ass kicking he took vs LV but he really did look competent for most of the season. Then the knee started barking at him. I think he can give us roughly what Thuney has - again, if the offense we've run the last 2 weeks is the offense we run - but there's just no time to find out. If DJ isn't up for the task, Thuney is your guy. But if we were to lose Caliendo for some reason, I'd rather move Thuney back into LG and Morris to LT than dick around with another LG. |
Quote:
You’re not doing that with a Left Tackle. That is far more important. If Thuney is playing better than anyone else at tackle (which he is) then he should absolutely start. If Humphries looks god then fine. But Andy isn’t going to start him if he looks somewhat shaky tomorrow |
Tomorrow game will be the tell tale for me. If he balls out against Nik Bonitto then I would consider putting him at left tackle. If he looks bad whiffing on blocks, giving up sacks, he’s the backup.
|
Quote:
Thuney hasn't. I don't understand why the bar for Humphries is HIGHER than Thuney for some people. Folks, we aren't benching Thuney here. We're moving the best LG in football back to LG. The bar for doing that shouldn't be any higher than 'not obviously worse at LT' because we will be orders of magnitude better at LG if we make that move. |
Quote:
You'd be re-inserting him into the lineup at the position he'd played all year. |
What's the chances this dude get hurts tomorrow? Seems like a broke dick
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the running game definitely suffers with Thuney outside but it doesn't matter. Pat being upright and healthy is more important than a difference in YPC in the running game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That being said the ceiling for Humpries at LT is definitely higher. He's not in game shape yet, he's already had an injury, but if he's able to get to 80% of what he was that's approaching a pro bowl player. Can he pull shit together this quickly with this little playing time? Don't know but I think everyone hopes so... |
Quote:
Quote:
It's really not that hard. And again, Humphries only needs to look about as good as Thuney. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think he’s going force the issue and play so well that they’re perfectly comfortable moving Thuney back inside. Everything seems to be lining up for the 3-peat and suddenly having solid LT play for the playoff run would kind of be the final icing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
When you think about it, Humphries doesn’t have to be better than Thuney…he has to be better than Caliendo.
|
What I don’t understand is why coaches can’t evaluate play in practice.
Are we simply not able to have de ‘s go at dj full speed? And evaluate how he does? I never understood using live game action to evaluate players. Reminds me of how jared Allen was on special teams and only got a chance to play due to injuries. No coaches could tell in scrimmages that he was good? When I played football in pop Warner coaches used scrimmaged to determine which position each kid would play and who would and wouldn’t start. |
Quote:
https://i.ibb.co/yWhBQmT/Screensho-7.jpg LT is just such a premium position comparatively. If Thuney is your best LT, you use Thuney at LT even if it makes you dogshit at G. Also this decision will be up to Patrick Mahomes. Mahomes isn't going to tell the coaching staff he wants the guy who's barely played with him to be his LT in the playoffs. Best case scenario is we blow out the Texans in the first half, move Humphries in 2nd half and he also balls out thrn maybe Mahomes will be comfortable. I simply just don’t think Mahomes is going to allow anyone but Joe Thuney to be his backside protection this year. Right or wrong. |
Quote:
And that's why Humphries is getting a shot. If they didn't like what they saw from him in practice, they wouldn't be giving him the chance to reclaim the job. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Why is Humphries vs Thuney at LT even a real discussion? If Humphries proves healthy, you play him. You know, play the guy with 100 starts in this league at LT as your LT and you move the best LG in the league, and maybe ever to play the game, back to ****ing LG. It really doesn't have to be hard.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If he clears all those things up this week, then super. Let’s roll. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m going to freak the **** out right now. You can’t do shit about it either. |
Quote:
Omenihu didn't forget how to play like a league-average starting DE when he returned from an injury that kept him out a similar amount of time, did he? |
He will acquit himself well today, bet on it
|
Quote:
We don’t need no goddamn left tackle! |
Quote:
He was in the bottom 10 in snap to pass time most of the season and the last two games he's been one of the fastest. That affects how the line looks a ton. I don't think Morris would look "good" or anything. But the offense would have been a ton better and we would be fine with living with his play. |
Quote:
As much as I'd like to be rational about Humphries giving us a higher ceiling, I'm also deathly afraid of losing what we already have. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What if I told you guys that we could just put Thuney back in if DJ struggles in the playoffs. I know. It’s wild and a little out there. But it’s a real thing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
People just didn't like Morris, because he got his shit pushed in last season and the same people that are preaching patience with Kingsley were the most vocal about Wanya Morris being shit at LT last year. I'm not a huge PFF guy, but I think they do a good job with OL advanced stats. Last year in games that he had 30 or more pass block reps his pass grades were; Week 13 GB - 73.4 Week 14 Buf - 60.3 Week 15 NE - 73.4 Week 16 LV - 51.7 Week 17 Cin - 74.9 10/24 pressures, 7/15 hurries, 2/7 hits, and 1/2 sacks came in week 16 against the Raiders. He was actually really impressive last year as a 3rd round rookie playing LT on a SB team. |
I’m a Morris fan too. I think we have something with him. Curious to see what they do with him next year.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He’s looking good so far.
|
Quote:
But the context is just so damn weird. Pretty disappointing - I hoped we'd at least PRETEND to give a shit for a half. |
He looks fine. He will start come playoff time if this continues.
|
He looks like a legit LT, we're rolling with him period
|
So far, so good. Neat to see Kingley playing guard as well.
|
LOL @ you guys declaring him ready to go. We are learning nothing from this shitshow.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fake football. You learn who you are in games that matter. |
Quote:
|
2nd half was awful for Humphries.
Thuney is the LT. |
Humphries just got cooked.
|
No way in hell is this guy starting in the playoffs.
|
I would be very surprised if we started anyone but Thuney at LT.
|
Well that rep didn't help a bit.
He looked really good on 3rd down. Looked like a complete oaf on 4th. But that's the first time he's stood out negatively to me so far. |
Quote:
He ain't ready. |
I’ve only been watching the second half and Humphries is not looking good. Based on comments that he was good early, maybe he ran out of steam. In any event stick with what was working and keep Thuney on the outside.
|
Quote:
|
The first half had me convinced we'd be fine, but I'm a little worried about him being in game shape. Can he last a whole game and then recover in a week to do it all over again?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hey, I’m all for having him on the roster as a backup, maybe an option for next year, but I’m not going into the playoffs with him as a starter. No way I. He’ll. |
Think we can make it work but to act with any confidence he’s anything above chicken salad is just cope
|
Quote:
|
He’s regressed the second half. Only one terrible wiff that I noticed. Not helping that wentz can’t make a decision to save his life. Jesus he looks bad. CBS just pulled the game here.
|
Quote:
|
So who’s your starting OL in the playoffs?
|
He does seem to have picked up the cadence better. He was slow to get off the line the first game but appears to be getting off right at the snap this time.
Unfortunately I don't think I saw enough to say with any authority what should be done. We just didn't do enough real football and Wentz was a mess. The one real bad whiff was obvious but he had several really strong reps as well. I don't think he'll be a clear upgrade on Thuney (unfortunately) but I'm not convinced he was worse than Thuney would be either. I'll just wait and see I guess. I just can't form any strong opinion from this game. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.