![]() |
Something is WAY off about this whole scenario...Peters was essentially blackballed by the entire league? The team with a 3 billion dollar stadium in the works gets the deal of the...well it's never happened before.
All-pro, defensive rookie of the year with the second most turnovers in history...playing for 1.8 mill...and KC has to give up a pick to trade him? |
Quote:
And you may see that a 4 this year and a 2 next year is a whole lot more than what we'd get if there was no interest and we just cut him. |
No one. Not one team in the league was willing to part with a 1st or 2nd this year for Peters. Let that sink in.
Because if anyone had offered it, we would have taken it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think we'll know more in the coming weeks because the conditions may or may not have been met. I do know that Battle was signed to the Seahawks again this year in January. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Peters & pick 182 for pick 120 this year & probably pick 58-64 next year. |
Quote:
I don't know, but I think the "reality" is that there was ONE TEAM who actually Peters. ONE TEAM for one of the best CBs in the league. That, at least for me, tells me all that I need to know. Cut your losses and get what you can I guess. I don't care for it, but that's the way it is.... |
In an effort to consolidate the discussion now that we have the trade terms, I'm closing this thread. Feel free to let me know if this is a gross injustice.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.