Left Tackles!! :rolleyes:

sucks to be you, bitch

It's a tricky thing to measure with a guy like Sanchez because you're largely grading him on potential. I agree with the idea of trading down if you don't like Sanchez, and I think there's got to be at least some reasonable doubt that the Chiefs might not take him. But I also know the workout is a small part of the equation--Ryan didn't look sharp in workouts last year either. I don't know the answer to whether Sanchez or Stafford is a franchise QB. Just trying to point out that it's not a slam dunk top 5 pick.

Yeah, cause there's such a shortage of LT propspects in this draft.

JFC!

Right back at ya' you pussy sack of shit.

maybe you can call your buddy Dirty Sanchez and suck his dick for some extra money so you can get NFL Network

When there are 5-7 OTs who will carry a first round grade, no one is going to trade up to 3, forfeiting nearly their entire draft, to take one when the difference between the top tier tackles is razor thin.

This is what happens when dumbasses post about the draft when they've never watched any college football or studied team needs and positional value.

Or maybe I can send him to Kansas to **** your old lady in the ass while I make you watch, and then knock your teeth down your ****ing throat for shits and giggles afterwards!

How'd THAT be, mother****er?

You are right there probably 6 that will probably go 1st rd and there is the upper tier of that grp (2-3 guys) that will go in the top 10. You start playing the poker with the upper tier LT's and Sanchez cards you have with those teams that are interested in those players in hopes to acquire picks by trading down.

Given who's behind us?
Seattle could look for a LT given that Walter Jones will be 36 going into 2009, which makes Eugene Monroe or Jason Smith potential trade targets. They'll definitely highly consider a WR like Crabtree or Maclin, whomever grades higher.Any one of the teams behind us could get hot and heavy over Aaron Curry. Any team that badly needs a nose tackle could be willing to give up a ton of picks as well if that could get them a guy like BJ Raji. The Raiders, Bengals, and Jaguars are three teams that could be interested in leapfrogging Seattle for one of those guys.

They don't have to trade up when 7 OTs went in the first round last year, and there are 5-7 who will go this year.

It's a flooded market. Supply outpaces demand. No one is going to trade up for these guys when they can stand pat, Keep several other high picks, and get an LT who is, at worst, 95% of the player as the guy they would have traded up for.

The Giants traded up for Eli Manning when they could have easily taken Philip Rivers in a draft class that was one of the deepest QB classes of all time. If you want the best, you get the best. Given how important the LT position is, if Monroe or Smith grade out very high relative to other tackles, why wouldn't you want the best in the business?

Christ, for all the people talking about "taking risks", you guys sure play the draft completely by the book.

1 cover backer taken in the top 3 in the last 20 years, and people are not only going to draft him at 3, but trade up to draft him at 3, and make him the highest paid LB in the league? :spock:

1 team in the top 11 runs a 3-4 and needs a NT. No one is trading their whole draft for BJ Raji.

No one is trading up to 3 for a 6'1" WR with a broken foot and speed ?s who comes from a spread offense, and Jeremy Maclin isn't going anywhere near 3.

Giants did draft Phillp Rivers.

ROFL

Are you going to put the ****ing hat on, Eli? Put the ****ing hat on!