ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs suspended Tyreek Hill (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=322576)

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14246133)
HE GOOD!!!!

:clap:

Kiimo 05-01-2019 02:50 PM

Have you heard about Ben Roethlisberger??

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14246134)
attractive


Oh.

BlackOp 05-01-2019 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14246109)
The "thought masters" arent feeding me shit because I haven't read a single thing that has been written by the media. I simply have a brain to understand that people just arent willy nilly investigated by the police on suspicion of child abuse and have a court order to remove him from the child.

Maybe if you had...you would know the child was removed because Crystal was passed out and suicidal....with Hills kid running around unsupervised. They took him away after while in the hospital..they found her too mentally unstable to look after a 3 year old.

Might as well blame that on Hill too...even though he was the one that called 9-11 from his hotel.

ChiefsHawk 05-01-2019 02:57 PM

Nobody knows a damn thing. For all we know Hill's kid ran in front of a car and Tyreek pulled him back by his arm and broke it. Or he's a raging psycho and broke his kids arm. Why don't people just wait and see wtf turns out

tyreekthefreak 05-01-2019 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14246058)
Keep hope alive that your favorite football player only moderately broke a child's arm so you can cheer for him.

Dude some of you need to take a step back.

DUDE, he says he didn't break the kids arm. Crystal says the kid may have fallen and broken his arm. It doesn't take much, that's why you see so many kids with casts.

You're the one who needs to take a step back....and THINK!

jd1020 05-01-2019 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14246150)
Maybe if you had...you would know the child was removed because Crystal was passed out and suicidal....with Hills kid running around unsupervised. They took him away after while in the hospital..they found her too mentally unstable to look after a 3 year old.

Might as well blame that on Hill too...even though he was the one that called 9-11 from his hotel.

You realize that's why the kid was removed for Crystal's custody and that Hill was at the hotel because he had a no contact court order against him because of a child abuse investigation, right?

I mean I know you are incompetent but damn...

Frazod 05-01-2019 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14246124)
Playing the race card now?

Well, all the liberal asshats are playing the lynch mob, so I thought I was sort of obligated. LMAO

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14246145)
Have you heard about Ben Roethlisberger??




Oh.

ROFL

Kiimo 05-01-2019 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14246150)
Maybe if you had...you would know the child was removed because Crystal was passed out and suicidal....with Hills kid running around unsupervised. They took him away after while in the hospital..they found her too mentally unstable to look after a 3 year old.

Might as well blame that on Hill too...even though he was the one that called 9-11 from his hotel.

I love how you are so quick to say we should let this play out before jumping to conclusions and one poster posts a story that is totally unverified and you are already preaching the gospel truth that Crystal is suicidal.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 03:21 PM

So anymore news on Hill tonight on KCTV5?

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 14246179)
You realize that's why the kid was removed for Crystal's custody and that Hill was at the hotel because he had a no contact court order against him because of a child abuse investigation, right?

I mean I know you are incompetent but damn...

I'm not saying dude is innocent.

He was accused of child abuse, which to date remains unproven and all charges were dropped. Do you know how many women claim child molestation and/or abuse during custody hearings and divorce proceedings? Again, I'm not saying this is the case even after knowing this crazy bitch tried to commit suicide while pregnant and while her 3 year old was running around. In those cases the mother is awarded sole custody of the child(ren) and, if the father is allowed to visit at all, any visits would be supervised. It is not unheard of at all for a father to be made to stay away from a child during this kind of situation. Given his history it was absolutely the right thing to do.

As far as the conduct detrimental thing goes, if allegations turn out to be false, the NFL would be morons to suspend the man and the NFLPA would be right to appeal and file grievances. While it may look bad to the league, there's not a whole lot the man can do about his crazy spouse.

That said, if Hill is indeed guilty then **** him. He's still LEGALLY entitled to due process though.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 03:31 PM

So what’s the consensus on here? Tyreek guilty or is he innocent? Will he be suspended or banned from the league? Will he be a member of the Chiefs or the Browns? Will he get an extension or no?

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14246191)
I love how you are so quick to say we should let this play out before jumping to conclusions and one poster posts a story that is totally unverified and you are already preaching the gospel truth that Crystal is suicidal.

Suicidal, drunk, high... What ever.... CPS doesn't remove a mothers child for no reason

jd1020 05-01-2019 03:32 PM

All charges were dropped? There were never any charges to begin with. The criminal investigation stalled because no one was talking. The CPS investigation was still ongoing and now the criminal investigation has reopened.

Hog's Gone Fishin 05-01-2019 03:34 PM

I just heard a tidbit on Sirius while I was driving home .It said "the league will not take action on the reopened investigation on Tyreek Hill"

I would assume that just means "at this time" and if the DA can't convict him he might not get any suspension from the league.

Thoughts?

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 14246241)
I just heard a tidbit on Sirius while I was driving home .It said "the league will not take action on the reopened investigation on Tyreek Hill"

I would assume that just means "at this time" and if the DA can't convict him he might not get any suspension from the league.

Thoughts?

I posted this earlier but basically the NFL said they won’t take action till the investigation is complete

BrownRice 05-01-2019 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14244998)
So when you called 911 the first time did crystal know it was you?

I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.

The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.

On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.

The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.

The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.

At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.

All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.

Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.

3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.

Red Dawg 05-01-2019 03:44 PM

There is zero chance he gets no games. None. He will be suspended eventually.

O.city 05-01-2019 03:49 PM

What tweet is everyone talking about here?

Sassy Squatch 05-01-2019 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownRice (Post 14246264)
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.

The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.

On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.

The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.

The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.

At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.

All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.

Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.

3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.

Who is this?

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownRice (Post 14246264)
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.

The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.

On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.

The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.

The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.

At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.

All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.

Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.

3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.

So Brooke what does your daily meal plan look like?

Hog's Gone Fishin 05-01-2019 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246262)
I posted this earlier but basically the NFL said they won’t take action till the investigation is complete

Man, can you imagine us getting Hill back after 8 games suspension. SB would be ours .

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 14246296)
Man, can you imagine us getting Hill back after 8 games suspension. SB would be ours .

I know!! He will probably appeal and get 4 games!! Imagine Hill Watkins Kelce and Hardman oh mama

Tribal Warfare 05-01-2019 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14246285)
Who is this?

Someone post under the anonymity of a message board username and that's it citing shear conjecture and hearsay.

This could the same threadstarter who saw Bill Cowher at a bestbuy for all we know in the "Hey Gang" thread

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 14246308)
Someone post under the anonymity of a message board username and that's it citing shear conjecture and hearsay.

This could the same threadstarter who saw Bill Cowher at a bestbuy for all we know in the "Hey Gang" thread

ROFL

saphojunkie 05-01-2019 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246288)
So Brooke what does your daily meal plan look like?

I imagine there's a lot of brown rice?

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 14246318)
I imagine there's a lot of brown rice?

I see what you did there you sly dog :clap:

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14246285)
Who is this?

An outstanding citizen

tyreekthefreak 05-01-2019 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownRice (Post 14246264)
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.

The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.

On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.

The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.

The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.

At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.

All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.

Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.

3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.

Screw this guy! I bet it's all lies!

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246288)
So Brooke what does your daily meal plan look like?

Taco Bell 4th meal in dis motha****a!

tyreekthefreak 05-01-2019 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownRice (Post 14246264)
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.

The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.

On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.

The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.

The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.

At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.

All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.

Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.

3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.

If all this were true he'd be locked up right now.

MeatRock 05-01-2019 04:09 PM

So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao


This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.

Sassy Squatch 05-01-2019 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 14246331)
So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao


This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.

Welcome to yesterday.

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 14246331)
So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao


This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.

I'd like to know if the cameras captured the abuse or why they weren't mentioned/subpoenaed in the original reports. I'd think tampering with evidence would have been a juicy headline

TripleThreat 05-01-2019 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14246134)
Do you really think if Hill was an attractive white male superstar...there would be this level of outrage? Do think Disneyland is real?

The media would frame it as a dysfunctional situation..a couple that's getting counseling and needs privacy.

It might be an uncomfortable reality to accept...but it is what it is.

LOL, you are inferring that if Tyreek Hill was white, he would not be receiving this level of scrutiny? LOL.

I think you fail to reaize you are living in the early 90's and 80's. This is 2019, when situations like this arise with people of "color" everyone is walking on egg-shells with what to do, to not seem racist, as something you are already being the perfect example of. Inferring this situation has turned into racism.

In reality if this was a white man, they would have no problem how they handle it because he is white, and no one would accuse any punishment as being racist, since he is in fact, white, right?

Keep on with your racist agenda, you are only dividing this country more and more. :clap:

MeatRock 05-01-2019 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14246333)
Welcome to yesterday.

Figured as much. c'est la vie!

CasselGotPeedOn 05-01-2019 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MeatRock (Post 14246331)
So, apparently there is now news that Hill called the police on crystal for passing out and leaving the 3 year old son unattended in the house from a hotel room. Happened April 1st and Hill seen it from video cameras on his phone from the home. Lmao


This shit is crazy! The story is on yahoo sports news.

https://media.giphy.com/media/kcfk5YEP0SN5m/200.gif

comochiefsfan 05-01-2019 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrownRice (Post 14246264)
I didn’t call 911. The complaints were walked in to the station. No one involved in the reporting called 911.

The only things I can confirm with you on those is that the second report with only one name was not filed against her. She was the one at home when the police arrived. His name is all over the actual report. He has been the one being investigated from the start. Also why he lost custody so quickly & she did not. All allegations of abuse are against him.

On the first report, both parties were at home when the police arrived. Allegations of abuse are, once again, only made against him. She is reported as neglecting the child for allowing him to remain in a home where his father is abusing him.

The first report, believe it or not, was filed after the child himself alleged to the reporting party that his father had been hurting him. They had daily contact with the child & had noticed “bumps & bruises” prior that “just weren’t right” but always had believable explanations. Not a family member or friend. Not even close to or related to the same persons who filed the second report.

The second report was reported by a very young couple who are extremely upset at even being involved in the situation as one of the parties is a high profile member of our City and was left with no other option than to do what he knew were the right thing(s) to do, after his girlfriend told him what her then very close friend (Espinal) had alleged to her to be going on in their home. This report was made after seeing the tweet that is said to have started it all.

At first the young couple thought for sure it was just a bad break up & that Espinal was just upset in running her mouth to her then friend. Once the tweet was put out though, they realized it might not be false, going back over the injuries they had witnessed the child to have had when they came in contact with him & that they needed to take further action than what the male had already done two days prior. They could not, in good conscience rely upon the first party he had told what was going on to properly handle the matter and assure the child was safe.

All the grandmas and grandpas in the situation that are being accused were not involved in the reporting whatsoever. Also, Hill was not the one to inform the Chiefs as to what was going on, that is a terribly wrong assumption. And if you read the context of my message, you should be able to figure out on your own who went to the organization with what they were told. And who filed the second report.

Also, the person who released the tape to the media was not one of the report filing parties. And it wasn’t Meredith. Meredith also had nothing to do with anything except for sending out a tweet. There was an agenda with the tweet. But on that day, at that time, none of those people involved in that agenda had any idea that an investigation had already been started by the NFL, and had only just been made aware of the first police report having been filed.

3/5 First report made based of child allegations
3/12 NFL Securities Letter
3/13 “The Tweet”
3/14 Second report based off Espinal’s claims to reporting party after seeing “the tweet”, also based off injuries they had witnessed the child have.

It sure sounds like you're trying to tell us that a Chiefs player was the one who ratted on Tyreek initially.

I find that incredibly hard to believe.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comochiefsfan (Post 14246347)
It sure sounds like you're trying to tell us that a Chiefs player was the one who ratted on Tyreek initially. I find that incredibly hard to believe.

Hmm I wonder who it could be.

GloryDayz 05-01-2019 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246227)
So what’s the consensus on here? Tyreek guilty or is he innocent? Will he be suspended or banned from the league? Will he be a member of the Chiefs or the Browns? Will he get an extension or no?

He's innocent. Well, he's guilty of having a crazy girlfriend who has terrible friends, and who also has an equally terrible family.

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-01-2019 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14245971)
The guy is under investigation for child whatever and you guys think they're gonna hand him 100 million or whatever?

He's still a chief because he's one of the best WR's in the game. Once it comes to signing him to an extension, they aren't taking on those optics.

if he's cleared to play, he'll be staying in Kansas City one way or another and you can damn well take that to the bank.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14246027)
They had been doing that BEFORE this shit went down.

I give it 1/10 he's still on the team next year but 10/10 that every single time his name is mentioned people are going to freak out. And they should.

the shitbag fans of the opponents can freak out all they want to. Everyone else? I don't give a f***.

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:23 PM

Lmao no sir,

The police reports were phoned in I believe it is notated on the reports

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:24 PM

Omg what if Patrick Mahomes made the report?!?!, I’m so conflicted

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:28 PM

Who’s the next chief to be ousted by the media?

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14246368)
Omg what if Patrick Mahomes made the report?!?!, I’m so conflicted

Maybe it's because Tyreek beat him at fortnite?

pugsnotdrugs19 05-01-2019 04:30 PM

BrownRice—you are almost certainly hinting that it was Mahomes and his girlfriend.. and if that’s not the case, you should probably clarify

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246379)
Who’s the next chief to be ousted by the media?

Clark,

Low hanging fruit, the idea is that if KC ever wins a Super Bowl they will never get called up to cover LA sports teams so they have to destroy our chances

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14246388)
BrownRice—you are almost certainly hinting that it was Mahomes and his girlfriend.. and if that’s not the case, you should probably clarify

God I mean that would be fuuuckee, because even if they were mistaken there is no coming back from that.....

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:36 PM

Wtf lol. Mahomes would not oust Tyreek like that.

staylor26 05-01-2019 04:38 PM

I don’t think Pat’s gf and Crystal are that good of friends...

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246404)
Wtf lol. Mahomes would not oust Tyreek like that.

If he suspected abuse I'd hope and assume he would..

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:39 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">From <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PFTPM?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PFTPM</a>, TE Travis Kelce says Chiefs players don&#39;t know whether Tyreek Hill will ever be back with the team <a href="https://t.co/qv1F1OC6Z5">https://t.co/qv1F1OC6Z5</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1123712677971410945?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Naptown Chief 05-01-2019 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246417)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">From <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PFTPM?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PFTPM</a>, TE Travis Kelce says Chiefs players don&#39;t know whether Tyreek Hill will ever be back with the team <a href="https://t.co/qv1F1OC6Z5">https://t.co/qv1F1OC6Z5</a></p>&mdash; ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1123712677971410945?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 1, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This just in, water is....wet. More at 11

SAUTO 05-01-2019 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14246077)
There is the potential there was no CONDUCT, I get it you have already made up your mind. It's ok to be wrong.

You should have made this post to yourself.

jd1020 05-01-2019 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246404)
Wtf lol. Mahomes would not oust Tyreek like that.

Do we know if Mr. Michael Pinkerton had an accomplice?

:hmmm:

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naptown Chief (Post 14246420)
This just in, water is....wet. More at 11

Florio just posting the hard hitting info!!

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:42 PM

Omg guys I cracked it (Brown) Rice

Patrick is brown

Patrick’s girlfriend is white.... what else is white.....

RICE

SAUTO 05-01-2019 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 14246089)
This isn't Cuba, dumbass. Innocent until proven guilty. It's not Hill's fault that a bunch of media jerkoffs have done everything in their power to paint him as a monster, and in the process made their loyal lemmings lose their tiny little minds.

What was Ezekiel Elliott convicted of?

Hog's Gone Fishin 05-01-2019 04:44 PM

Maybe a blessing in disgust...... Tyreek gets to play after a suspension and the Chiefs use that to give him a 6 years 12 million deal.

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 14246432)
What was Ezekiel Elliott convicted of?

Uhh apples and oranges..... but you’re right he shouldn’t have been suspended

Kiimo 05-01-2019 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14246429)
Omg guys I cracked it (Brown) Rice

Patrick is brown

Patrick’s girlfriend is white.... what else is white.....

RICE

Also rice is brown

Mahomes is cheating on Brittany

CP detectives always catch their man

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14246442)
Also rice is brown

Mahomes is cheating on Brittany

CP detectives always catch their man

Just doing my job ma’am

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog's Gone Fishin (Post 14246434)
Maybe a blessing in disgust...... Tyreek gets to play after a suspension and the Chiefs use that to give him a 6 years 12 million deal.

I am perfectly okay with that!! We can use that 8 mil to re sign Fuller

FlorentinePogen 05-01-2019 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14246388)
BrownRice—you are almost certainly hinting that it was Mahomes and his girlfriend.. and if that’s not the case, you should probably clarify

I second this and would like to hear more from BrownRice.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:50 PM

Would Clark fight the league harder then Jerry fought?

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246456)
Would Clark fight the league harder then Jerry fought?

No,

Although I think Clark was one of the owners who backed Jerry...

SAUTO 05-01-2019 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14246437)
Uhh apples and oranges..... but you’re right he shouldn’t have been suspended

Same situation

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14246462)
No,

Although I think Clark was one of the owners who backed Jerry...

Yea he was. Oh how the tables have turned. Would Jerry have Clark’s back if Goodell tries to suspend Hunt with no evidence

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 14246466)
Same situation

I mean I guess it could be, unless Crystal is now saying it wasn’t him.... in which case that’s why I bring up Fosters

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246468)
Yea he was. Oh how the tables have turned. Would Jerry have Clark’s back if Goodell tries to suspend Hunt with no evidence

Yes,

But Jerry is currently fighting the “can we stop testing for weed” fight

Kiimo 05-01-2019 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14246475)
Yes,

But Jerry is currently fighting the “can we stop testing for weed” fight

That's a worthy fight.

Iconic 05-01-2019 05:01 PM

Could be Kelce and his girl... but the way BrownRice is talking it truly does sound like Pat and Brit.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 05:02 PM

Cps investigations usually take around 45 days. How long has it been since the cps investigation was opened up?

Kiimo 05-01-2019 05:03 PM

If Mahomes and Brittany were the ones forced to report Hill he'd have been kicked off this team in March.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 05:04 PM

Yea I ain’t buying it’s Mahomes. Watch it be some third string player like Deon Yelder

BleedingRed 05-01-2019 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14246497)
If Mahomes and Brittany were the ones forced to report Hill he'd have been kicked off this team in March.

My thoughts

Best22 05-01-2019 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14246500)
Yea I ain’t buying it’s Mahomes. Watch it be some third string player like Deon Yelder

Yelders not very high profile

SAUTO 05-01-2019 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14246469)
I mean I guess it could be, unless Crystal is now saying it wasn’t him.... in which case that’s why I bring up Fosters

I have no idea what you mean here.

Elliott was suspended and never convicted.

arrwheader 05-01-2019 05:10 PM

I’m starting to think they are just dysfunctional and no abuse or crime occurred hill just being treated like so because of his history. Media just created a shit storm.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 05-01-2019 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arrwheader (Post 14246518)
I’m starting to think they are just dysfunctional and no abuse or crime occurred hill just being treated like so because of his history. Media just created a shit storm.

Then how do explain the broken arm on Zev?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.