![]() |
Quote:
People comparing the votes and funding of a need, public schools, to a want, private sports, and targeting the voters who prioritize those two things as they should be is asinine. They vote on each as they see fit and as they come along. Unless they're willing to foot the bill non locals should probably keep their traps shut about the locals making their own area's financial decisions, especially considering they haven't even cleaned up the property tax debacle, scandal, ineptitude, whatever you want to call it. If you want a bigger middle finger the next time around, everyone should keep talking smack to the residents about how they should be spending their money. I don't really understand why people would even expect a county to compete with a state at this point either. Especially, when those resident can just drive a few miles and get the same experience for free. Kansas didn't even think about trying to ram the funding down a single county's throat, and for good reason. |
Quote:
Is green bay thriving? Buffalo? Detroit? Cleveland? Maybe if a city isn't already a major tourist destination then perhaps a stadium doesn't help that much? It's a tough to hear how great the stadiums are for the city when you take a look around. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Arrowhead may be seen as something their tax money got right. As time changes both stadium are too much an expense. The last vote may have said as much
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now why are they in bad shape and not generating more revenue? No clue. If the city/county own them then that would be a question that they would be better answering. I can say that governments at all levels mismanage funds and resources all the time. Might as well keep a tax that’s been around for a long time to upgrade stadiums that at least provide a distraction and civic pride to the residents. I might feel differently if they were introducing a new tax, but they aren’t. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But one thing I know for sure is that the stadiums do not bring in this unlimited wealth as some want to believe. |
The chances that the Chiefs stay in Missouri went up considerably tonight. Mike Kehoe won the Republican Primary for Governor. Kehoe is Parsons guy and was the only candidate that signaled a willingness to use state money to keep the Chiefs.
|
Quote:
|
This is making the rounds today and I've seen other KC reporters confirm it. Royals looking at a new downtown site.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Royals have explored multiple downtown stadium sites, with recent talks w/ the city studying the viability of Washington Square Park north of Crown Center, multiple sources told me.<br><br>Wherever it is, Mayor Lucas prefers to avoid another vote. More here:<a href="https://t.co/CSiRyNczEE">https://t.co/CSiRyNczEE</a></p>— Sam McDowell (@SamMcDowell11) <a href="https://twitter.com/SamMcDowell11/status/1823753521780736345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 14, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
I really like the Washington Square Park idea. Still in the heart of the city. Adjacent to transit/hotel/visitor type things like Crown Center not far from Liberty Memorial. It does not put a bunch of people out with no good plan.
Makes a lot of sense if they can make the footprint work. |
Figures Mayor Lucas wants to rip down George Washington's Statue. Fat Zach is all for also. makes sense.
https://cloudinary-assets.dostuffmed...1492113061.jpg |
STL was able to fit Busch stadium into the same area (~540,000 sqft), so maybe they can. And I think the BCBS building will have to be consumed to get the square footage they're looking for, but that might be able to be done. :shrug:
I'd still like to see it on the river, but this isn't a bad choice either. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
**** this jackass Royals owner and his downtown dreams. If they want to take a park take Penn Valley Park. The off-leash dog park along with Pioneers Mothers park and KC Kickball club. He would have one of the best views of the City and all the room to do what he wants with his vision of an entertainment area. |
Quote:
https://www.bluekc.com/press-release...-headquarters/ |
Quote:
I thought this was the render at first and was going to say it looks terrible. Then I realized it's the K as it currently sits and now I know why they need to move. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Irony is this is the site Keitzman and WHB were pimping back in the day. It's actually a pretty good spot overall. A Crown Center rebirth would be a good thing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You are a truefan I am amazed |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.shutterstock.com/shutter.../7.jpg?ip=x480 https://media1.giphy.com/media/s9kJX...giphy.gif&ct=g |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I speak Valley Boy.
It’s not the desire to watch the game. It’s the choice of blue horse blinders. |
Quote:
The K continues to be well received among even the most traveled of baseball fans. Quote:
|
Finally found the old plan from the early 00s for the ballpark at that site.
https://i.postimg.cc/Wbvch58t/455642...75347994-n.jpg |
Interesting. Never knew they already had a sort of concept for that site.
|
The more I think about this idea the more I really like it.
It is in the city but has minimal disruptions to things around it. It is transit adjacent in a lot of ways and that can keep expanding. There is a history of having events in the area and one of the biggest plusses is you have 3 land owners in the area who are open to playing ball. |
Yeah, that site makes a ton of sense the more I look at it.
|
Quote:
|
Yeah, it gets better the more you think about it. There are some existing parking structures in the area to support Crown Center already, and you can probably find a close-ish spot to build a new one, too.
There would be lots of ways to access the stadium, too - including the street cars. Decent highway access. And you can route traffic north, east, and west without adding huge or inconvenient travel times for folks. You'd have to make sure to NOT direct gameday car traffic to Grand or you're creating problems. |
Right on the light rail track, probably the most parking possibilities in the Downtown area, no more bitching about crap hotels, and even a little space for Sherman to include a venue of some sort. They just have to build over the tracks like they plan to do over 670. I like it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Let me know if you need Universal Studios tickets |
I like it, now let's see if we can get it done, then have THE STATE along with KACO work a plan that builds and epic domed or "coverable" stadium/multi-use facility for the Chiefs using all of the current complex's acreage.
The baseball team "in downtown" (where baseball should be played) and the Chiefs in/at a location that would allow for the tailgating tradition to continue. At least let us know exactly what our taxes would be buying. |
Buddy who works in the Blue KC building has been adamant that this was always going to be the spot since the conversations started
|
Quote:
|
Not really. If you say that you're paying attention to the game, that's fine. That's good! But it means that you will be doing that wherever the stadium is. But for the people whose attention wanders you're staring at a highway.
Compare that to a Wrigley Field or a Petco. It's kind of embarrassing not to showcase the city at your ballpark. Move it downtown, nothing will change for you, who pays close attention to the game. But for the casual viewer the whole experience will improve. |
Quote:
|
I don't immediately hate that plan and location. And it seems popular enough
Can the incompetent folks in charge actually get it done? |
What? A downtown experience is entirely different than a highway and an Adams Mark experience.
I feel like people are arguing just because the Royals where it is is a shorter drive for them. Nobody can PREFER Independence / Raytown to a downtown ballpark, especially if done right. Arguing in bad faith, telling us imaginary problems with parking and which direction it's facing. All of that will get worked out. I don't feel bad for people driving a little further, I have to fly 3.5 hours to see a game. |
In all the games I’ve attended, I’ve rarely noticed or paid attention to the interstate. I think that’s because I spent so many seasons sitting in the outfield GA seats. But even today, sitting down low behind first base, the interstate doesn’t really register with me. That scoreboard is huge and takes up a lot of a fans attention.
Still, it would be nice to see something more appealing in the distance. Even if we have to move the George Washington statue to a different location. (cuz that’s such a big deal to absolutely nobody). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well maybe I misunderstood your post.
|
Quote:
Either way, they can't outrun aging stadiums. I had forgot all about this new/old location. It's interesting, but the footprint looks awfully small. Maybe a rendering would help show how it fits into that space without feeling like a shoebox. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do think this is a pretty nice location. Washington Park has some sentimental attachment for me. When The Engineering firm I worked for was located on the Plaza and later 29th and Main I would meet my eldest Sis who worked at Hallmark in the the Arts Department. I'd bring a burger and Fries from Winsteads and sometimes Checkers. We would sit under a nice shade tree near Old George and have lunch. We did a lot of work for the Halls on the expansions at Hallmark Cards and the layout of skywalks around Crown Center. My sis is no longer with us but I often think of those times when we were younger and healthy. |
Just checked another site talking about the potential Washington Park site, and like clockwork, it is roundly getting dunked on for all the same lame ass reasons.
Parking! Gridlock! Taxes! Gentrification! Homeless! Crime! George Washington! Billionaires! Kauffman is great! Seriously, these ****s need to get laid in the worst way... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quit blaming the tax payers that have to pay for this billionaire welfare. |
Quote:
Sorry if I do not look to you for takes on big civic projects. |
Civic project lol more like line Shermans and his investor's pockets.
Stick to the Current and Sporting KC Soccer Mom! |
Jackson County votes to put Chiefs only sales tax question on November ballot
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Jackson County voters moved a step closer to seeing a Chiefs only sale tax on the November ballot. But the question voters see on the ballot would be different than the proposal that lost in April. Unlike the last vote with a deal in place and commitments from the Royals and Chiefs to stay if voters approved the tax, now they are admitting this is little more of a Hail Mary, but say as they try to compete with Kansas and the state’s star bonds package they are doing everything they can to try to stay competitive. In the latest plan, the Chiefs would have their own tax. For both teams it was 3/8 cent sales tax. Now it would be a quarter percent, so slightly less. This goes for 20 years, instead of 40. But there was discussion by those voting no, saying neither the Chiefs nor Jackson County’s Sports Authority are in favor of this. [...] |
The state of Missouri needs to step-up and help JACO, if they don't they Chiefs will move because the Kansas offer, as an entire state, is far better than anything one Missouri county could possibly put together.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do you see the plan for the rest of your tax dollars or do you just pay the shit? Vote yes! The teams are the heart of the city. You don't want to pay then move to Omaha or Little Rock where they don't have shit. Keep your tiny 100 bucks a year and **** off. |
Welp...
Jackson County lawmakers reject Chiefs-only sales tax measure aimed at saving stadium talks It’s back to square one for the Jackson County Legislature as it tries to figure out how to keep the Chiefs from leaving Kansas City. In a 5-4 vote, the legislature rejected a proposal to place a Chiefs-only sales tax measure on the November ballot. The quarter-cent tax would go into effect in October 2031 — after the current 3/8th-cent sales tax ends. This tax would fund improvements for Arrowhead Stadium and the Truman Sports Complex and would not include Kauffman Stadium. It was a compromise that 1st District Legislator Manny Abarca IV, who sponsored the measure, hoped would ease voters’ concerns about funding a new Royals ballpark. [...] |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Let’s do it, KC!<a href="https://t.co/TgjI0HnucN">https://t.co/TgjI0HnucN</a> <a href="https://t.co/W2b5AQbGBV">pic.twitter.com/W2b5AQbGBV</a></p>— Chris Stritzel (@chris_stritzel) <a href="https://twitter.com/chris_stritzel/status/1828122378544828736?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 26, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
|
Welp, when it's an entire state against one county in another state, these things will happen.
Oh well.. |
Dumb ass county
|
Nobody liked that mexican queer Manny's idea and shot it down.
|
Haha awesome **** manny Abraca
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If something is going to happen in MO it's going to be with the city of Kansas City teaming up with the State and not Jackson County, and probably a good thing Frank White is kept out. Despite being on different sides of the fence politically it sounds like Mayor Lucas and Governor Parsons are on the same page with keeping the teams.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.