![]() |
I don't trust him.. I think Thuney is the clear choice..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
More than likely we were going to get a result that said "idk, maybe he can do it, maybe not." The only way you'll find out is if you start him in the playoffs, and at that point it might be a game-altering horrific mistake. I'm not trying to prop up Thuney and Caliendo as great, but we've run out of time. We don't know what we have with Humphries, but we do know what we have with Thuney. |
LMAO man some of you just won't stop no matter what proof is presented to you
Humphries Derangement Syndrome He gave Reid and Heck all the reasons he needed to, to get the playoff starts... bet me on it, you win and you get all my considerable casino cash deal? |
I wonder if Morris could play LG or if Caliendo is the clear choice? …assuming Thuney at LT.
|
He was awful in the second half today. Cannot be trusted.
He's a backup. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The offense was hardly on the field the first half and he still looked gassed the second half.
|
Quote:
It was hard to evaluate also because Wentz held onto the ball too long at times too. |
Dude was an absolute F in the second half.
It needs to be Thuney at LT for the playoffs. STFU about "we need him back inside for the run game". It's a dumb take. This offense goes through Pat. |
Yeah I mean Im undefeated in Chiefsplanet bets and if one of you wants to bet real money that Thuney won't be starting at LT in the divisional. Well you let me know.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Moreover, in 2 of the 3 games Thuney played at LT he wasn't any better than Humphries was today. Given that we're probably going to play the Chargers in the Divisional, I think I'd go Thuney. We can play a pretty tight, mistake free offense and win that game. The only way we lose it is if we turn the ball over. But at the same time, that will firmly close the door on Humphries and I think we just might need more than that in the AFCCG and SB. It's just a much harder decision than some are making it, IMO. Thuney has definitely not been the rock wall some are suggesting at LT and Caliendo has looked real bad the last two weeks. As a couch warrior I want to see Humphries. If I were in Andy's chair, I'm not sure I could talk myself into it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No one said Thuney was Oralndo Pace, but for 3 games he was MILES ahead of anything Humphries showed today. Not even close. The offense had its best games with Joe at LT. That's enough. |
YOU EGG SUCKING FOOLS WILL SOON LEARN :old:
|
Quote:
The safe play is Thuney, but it isn’t going to cut in the big games. If we want to have any semblance of a running game back, you have to have Thuney at LG. |
Quote:
I saw enough from Humphries to think he'll be okay and you have Thuney next to him instead of a scrub. Outside of a few snaps, Humphries was actually burying Bonitto in the turf most of the game and his weakness is speed rushers. He has another two weeks to keep knocking the rust off. I'd roll with Humphries at LT and Thuney LG but that's me. I guess I'm not as scared as some. |
Quote:
No. We don't. And "in the big games???" What? It was a three game stretch where he faced the best pass rushers in the NFL. Dude just sit down. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will be shocked if he isn’t the starter going forward. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
LMAO short lease in the playoffs when we're trying to 3peat???
When we have won all these games by 1 score? We don't have margins for error. We aren't testing out left tackles in the playoffs. It's gonna be Thuney |
Quote:
I mean I get that he had some bad reps but he had some damn good ones as well. Reps that Thuney doesn't have in his bag, IMO. Like you, I saw a guy that was really handling Bonitto at times. That's SUPER encouraging. And I think some people just watched him waiting for the bad rep that allows them to discard him while ignoring the things he did pretty well. But he did fall off in the second half. Maybe that was the LG next to him but it may have been fatigue and that's awfully disconcerting. That's where things get murky. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Personally, if we lose with Thuney, I'll believe we lost with our best possible OL situation out there. I can live with that. I absolutely cannot live with losing with Humphries when I can trust my own eyes and see the offense performing at it's highest level when Thuney was there at LT. If there was more time to flesh out this idea with Humphries, I'd be on board. But we are sadly very much out of time. |
You start Humphries and gameplan around what you know
Dude is Donovan Smith level so you roll with it until you can’t |
Quote:
Do your own homework or shut the **** up. Because that guys a goddamn moron. |
Quote:
It is a complete fabrication. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We know how we match up with each one of these teams already and the smarter choice will be made. The game won't be close. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He DID improve over the three games in question. He was flat out bad against Cleveland, regardless of what people try to say. By Pittsburgh he was probably above average. I wouldn't say 'good' but he did get better every week. That's worth something. |
Quote:
|
Honestly, I'm just glad the 2s got a full game of reps to see what they do/don't have.
|
Humphries gives us a high ceiling, so I'd prefer they at least give it a shot, but if he's struggling early just go back to Thuney :shrug:
|
Quote:
Baltimore and Buffalo are both less talented than last year. We won't play either one in the divisional. You really think Denver and the Chargers are within 7 pts of this team in the playoffs? No... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's just made up from whole cloth. Really stupid. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not sure which of those points you think is arguable. Buffalo's D is complete bottom 10 ass. Raven's D is unbelievably weak vs the pass and rely on the pass rush to get home. Flowers is hurt and may not even play next week. |
Quote:
Lost to the Bills Beat Denver by a blocked FG Beat the Chargers by 2 then 7 I like the Chiefs but not sure what you’re watching to say the games won’t be close |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's gonna be Thuney. Humphries was ASS in the second half today. Looked absolutely gassed. What's really stupid is your take that we're gonna start him at left tackle after 1 decent half of football all season. Put the f'n crack pipe down |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because that’s what I’m disputing despite believing we’ll win them all |
If he’s the starter. I think he needs to get in a high humidity setting and run some sprints with Watson the next two weeks. His conditioning is off and most of the bad play was in the second half because of it .
|
Humphries had a 15.6 pass block grade today. Allowed 2 sacks, 3 hurries and 5 pressures in 24 reps. That is ****ing atrocious.
|
The good news is that if Humphries starts at LT, Thuney starts at LG and can completely handle the inside.
I have to think that's the best possibility, but who knows. |
Lamar went into a mini tailspin after losing to the Chiefs. His head is a available for coitus
|
Quote:
|
Suamatia played in 24 pass block snaps at LT today and had a 60.4 pass block grade. He allowed 1 pressure and 1 hurry. He way out performed Humphries.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think he played a single snap at LT. I only ever saw him at LG. |
Uh yea Kingsley played LG.
|
Looks like Seth is taking a close look, so I'll look for that article. Initial indication is the dude got gassed. In some ways that's encouraging, but it's a bit much to expect he'll be in dramatically better shape in 2 weeks.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The correct answer is one FWIW. 2nd half looking like it's gonna get tough though.</p>— Seth Keysor (@RealMNchiefsfan) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealMNchiefsfan/status/1876064199790760183?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">(Narrator) it was tough. <br><br>Writing tonight, will post tomorrow.</p>— Seth Keysor (@RealMNchiefsfan) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealMNchiefsfan/status/1876065919392510215?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 6, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
I find it a little interesting that they have a lot of young players reps and Ethan Driscoll got none, interesting he got carried on the 53 all year and didn't even get run like Nourzad and Hanson.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Seth Keysor is doing a write up on Humphries and 1st half in 13 pass block snaps he had 1 loss.
Said 2nd half was rough but won’t disclose the data until tomorrow. Edit shit DaFace beat me to it. |
Quote:
|
Saw Humphries shoveling snow today for over an hour and he went as fast as he could to get a zone 2 aerobic workout in...since the gym is closed. Wore his workout watch and everything lol
He went waaay into the street and was carrying the snow way back into his yard. Then kept going over places that barely had any snow. His neighbors had to think he was losing it. |
Quote:
|
Easier protecting midget over giant
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He’s not in game shape. It’s clear as day
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Someone was asking for advanced PFF stats and I think I posted what you’re looking for in a different thread
Thuney's Pass Blocking Score for those 3 games at LT were 43.5, 63.5, & 68.2 whereas he was consistently in the high 80s as a LG. This provides support for the theory others have presented that we should let Humphries start at LT next game and monitor him closely. |
He's been sidelined with a hammy. He has 2 weeks to get in better shape which can/will happen. First half is a good indicator.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.