![]() |
Quote:
2nd Matt Cassel loves you have your excuses LMAO |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's the QBs that never get that structure and proper development early on that struggle most. Smith was there until 2011... though he still did show some decent play in the 2nd half of 2010. But in 2011? It was almost as if he were a stunted rookie thanks to the Nolan/Singletary nightmare. He FINALLY got the good development for a couple years, albeit so very late in his career. Other QBs that have shared in even a taste of such miserable early years have flamed out badly or been permanent, forgettable backups. I like to ramble with my coffee... don't like it? **** all of you! :p |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or you can just obtain hard data instead of guessing. 2012 Season Drop Rate Anquan Boldin --- 3.57%, 65 catches, 4 drops. Michael Crabtree - 3.94 %, 85 catches, 5 drops. Both guys have stellar hands. http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/drops/2012/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Boldin's average catch was for 14.17 yards after yac. Crabtree's average catch was for 13.00 after yac. That means that Boldin on average was catching his passes about 3 yards deeper than Crabtree. (that isn't an indictment of either player or quarterback on my part). What I'd like to see is a stat of % double coverage. From the "eye-ball" test, I'd say that Boldin was double covered much more often than Crabtree. If true, would reasonably diminish YAC, targets (more coverage), and one could argue making catching that more difficult. To point to Crabtree's yards and say he's a better WR than Boldin is akin to pointing to Alex Smiths Quarterback rating and saying he was better than Tom Brady or Drew Brees. |
Quote:
|
My most fervent wish, is that Axl takes a big fat shit ALL over this thread tomorrow... in the eyes, nose, down the throat, smeared all over your nice clean shirts.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.