ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270480)

BigCatDaddy 09-18-2013 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 9991011)
LOL you guys are acting like bitches. What's done is done you can either let it go or dwell on it negatively or you can look to the future and be optimistic. Those stats do nothing for us today and as of right now the only thing that matters as far as football goes is Ws. You can continue to call him Alice but right now, like I said before he's 2 - 0 with room grow in this new offense, and has to learn it just like the rest of his teammates. There are guys who have the benefit of being in the right situation and most of all consistency in one system. It shows, look at all the top QBs they've all been in the same system with the same team either since they started or was with one for a long time. There's no denying that.

<b>Now go look at the QBs who have and multiple coordinators and have been on multiple teams. It is rare to find one of them at the top and it's definitely proven that it's difficult for any QB to succeed when placed in that situation.</b>

<b>As for the other guy, I don't see why he keeps dwelling on what Alex has done in the past. He can keep being a coward behind his keyboard for all I care. No one in their right mind would waste this much of their time doing this. There's no reason to. NONE.</b>

I for one can't see why the **** a 9er fan would follow a broke dick QB to another teams forum. I see no reason, none.

2nd Matt Cassel loves you have your excuses LMAO

Alex Smiff 09-18-2013 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 9991011)
excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excusesexcuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses excuses

:deevee:

JENKINSWINS 09-18-2013 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9991018)
I for one can't see why the **** a 9er fan would follow a broke dick QB to another teams forum. I see no reason, none.

2nd Matt Cassel loves you have your excuses LMAO

The guy is 2 - 0. How can you not be a fan of that? :D

Eleazar 09-18-2013 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 9991035)
The guy is 2 - 0. How can you not be a fan of that? :D

Most people are fans of being right more than the Chiefs around here.

Sandy Vagina 09-18-2013 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 9991011)
It shows, look at all the top QBs they've all been in the same system with the same team either since they started or was with one for a long time. There's no denying that.

Now go look at the QBs who have and multiple coordinators and have been on multiple teams. It is rare to find one of them at the top and it's definitely proven that it's difficult for any QB to succeed when placed in that situation.

Pretty well agree. I'll make a distinction on that. The veteran QBs who have been developed well in their early years can more likely then go to a team with issues and still plug away a decent or good season.

It's the QBs that never get that structure and proper development early on that struggle most. Smith was there until 2011... though he still did show some decent play in the 2nd half of 2010. But in 2011? It was almost as if he were a stunted rookie thanks to the Nolan/Singletary nightmare. He FINALLY got the good development for a couple years, albeit so very late in his career. Other QBs that have shared in even a taste of such miserable early years have flamed out badly or been permanent, forgettable backups.

I like to ramble with my coffee... don't like it? **** all of you! :p

BigCatDaddy 09-18-2013 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JENKINSWINS (Post 9991035)
The guy is 2 - 0. How can you not be a fan of that? :D

I was a fan of being 13-3, but I wasn't a fan of Steve Bono.

Sandy Vagina 09-18-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9991018)
I for one can't see why the **** a 9er fan would follow a broke dick QB to another teams forum. I see no reason, none.

You don't need to understand it. Just be happy it gave you something to do with your afternoon.. as pathetic as that is. We're here for you, bro... so you won't hang yourself over such a miserable existence. Just say thank you, ****face! :)

BigCatDaddy 09-18-2013 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9991059)
You don't need to understand it. Just be happy it gave you something to do with your afternoon.. as pathetic as that is. We're here for you, bro... so you won't hang yourself over such a miserable existence. Just say thank you, ****face! :)

For that I am appreciative. You can't find a bigger collection of dumb ****s than in this thread. It's provided me with entertainment and a big smile all day long :D

JENKINSWINS 09-18-2013 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9991051)
I was a fan of being 13-3, but I wasn't a fan of Steve Bono.

Don't you mean Stephanie Bono?

Kaepernick 09-18-2013 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 9990816)
2 words...drop rate.

If I have to put the ball up, who am I gonna count on? Crabtree improved last year...but he's still not half the WR as Boldin when it comes to that.

Boldin was also double covered most of last year compared to Crabtree? not so much...but yeah..stats tell the facts...if you chose the right ones...or you could cherry pick. :banghead:


Or you can just obtain hard data instead of guessing.


2012 Season Drop Rate

Anquan Boldin --- 3.57%, 65 catches, 4 drops.
Michael Crabtree - 3.94 %, 85 catches, 5 drops.

Both guys have stellar hands.


http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/drops/2012/

Sandy Vagina 09-18-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9991013)
What's up with the rep stick turned off? You carry that inferiority complex about having a small stick to real life to the internets?

Nah. Just thought the whole rep thing was fake and ghey to begin with. For children who feed their sense of self on how they were perceived by other anonymous assholes on a forum. Once I figured out you can turn the shit off, I was all for it. why? You wanted to send me another love tap and got frustrated when you couldn't, puddin;? :D

Sandy Vagina 09-18-2013 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaepernick (Post 9991107)
Or you can just obtain hard data instead of guessing and exposing your preconceived bias.


2012 Season Drop Rate

Anquan Boldin --- 3.57%, 65 catches, 4 drops.
Michael Crabtree - 3.94 %, 85 catches, 5 drops.

Both guys have stellar hands.


http://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/drops/2012/

I'd say Crabtree was improving towards Boldin-type status. Boldin still being better at going up in traffic for tough catches... Crabtree better at YAC.

Jakemall 09-18-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9991122)
I'd say Crabtree was improving towards Boldin-type status. Boldin still being better at going up in traffic for tough catches... Crabtree better at YAC.

I won't argue with this. Crabtree had 6.4 yac for 2012. Boldin at 4.2

Boldin's average catch was for 14.17 yards after yac.

Crabtree's average catch was for 13.00 after yac.

That means that Boldin on average was catching his passes about 3 yards deeper than Crabtree. (that isn't an indictment of either player or quarterback on my part).

What I'd like to see is a stat of % double coverage. From the "eye-ball" test, I'd say that Boldin was double covered much more often than Crabtree. If true, would reasonably diminish YAC, targets (more coverage), and one could argue making catching that more difficult.

To point to Crabtree's yards and say he's a better WR than Boldin is akin to pointing to Alex Smiths Quarterback rating and saying he was better than Tom Brady or Drew Brees.

BigCatDaddy 09-18-2013 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9991115)
Nah. Just thought the whole rep thing was fake and ghey to begin with. For children who feed their sense of self on how they were perceived by other anonymous assholes on a forum. Once I figured out you can turn the shit off, I was all for it. why? You wanted to send me another love tap and got frustrated when you couldn't, puddin;? :D

Kind of like the reeruned kid in class I felt sorry for you and was going to give you some greens.

Easy 6 09-18-2013 04:30 PM

My most fervent wish, is that Axl takes a big fat shit ALL over this thread tomorrow... in the eyes, nose, down the throat, smeared all over your nice clean shirts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.