Quote:
2) Disney didn't acquire the rights to Star Wars until long after the prequel trilogy was released. The magic of SWs was dismantled long before Disney got involved. 3) These "live-action" remakes of Disney animated classics have pretty much been universally liked. Some of you guys just love to complain. |
EVERYONE'S SLEEPING ON EMPERORS NEW GROOVE
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2) Doesn't matter when they got them, they've ****ed the Skywalker saga up six ways to Sunday. 3) Granted, I haven't seen many if any of them, and I'm actually looking forward to Lion King, but this idea isn't a winner. Complain? Yeah, but this falls back for me on the last decade plus of watching classics get remade or rebooted. I like new stuff, and I especially don't like classics being remade poorly just for seemingly a money grab. JMO |
I can't fully express my surprise that a forum full of middle-aged dudes isn't excited about a kids movie.
|
Quote:
|
When I heard Smith was going to be the genie I immediately thought it was perfect **shrugs**
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This is just a truly horrendous take. My God, man. Log out. |
Quote:
And, I feel you. I think everyone likes originality, but it's not the studio's fault people eat up the remakes and reboots. They've already got a large target audience vested in seeing the new take. If you don't like it then you've got to stop watching them and start supporting the originals. Movies like Valerian: City of a Thousand Planets and Mortal Engines are risky. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Who really wants to watch Sleeping Beauty? The Sword in the Stone? Lol. Not me. Though I did love Jungle Book growing up and recently watched Pinocchio on Netflix and it was a damned good flick. |
Quote:
I was born in the 80s too. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.