ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Warfield's coming suspension vs. J Lewis' suspension (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=100839)

FringeNC 10-09-2004 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
This is probably by far the stupidest argument i've heard.

If talking on a cell phone imposes a higher expected cost than driving drunk, shouldn't the penalty be larger? This is just so basic...the fact that you are so confused about it......doesn't speak highly of your IQ.

FringeNC 10-09-2004 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
Uh..think about it. He assisted in selling an illegal drug (by the US government standards) vs putting his own life and many other peoples lives in danger, not once, not twice, but 3 fuggin times.

So I suppose someone should be beheaded for talking on a cell phone when driving, since it is more dangerous.

Skip Towne 10-09-2004 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy
This is probably by far the stupidest argument i've heard.

Probably by far?

go bo 10-09-2004 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox
So your arguement takes the following valid logical form:

My premise is that cocaine harms only the user.

Therefore my conclusion is that cocaine should be legal.

Your conclusion follows logically from your premise. I don't agree with the premise, but at least it is a logical argument.

Gobo argues:

If cocaine were legal, you wouldn't have criminal element involved. Well duh. My arguement about murder is an example to show that his form argument is unvalid and pointless.

unvalid, huh?

whatever you say... ROFL ROFL ROFL

BigMeatballDave 10-09-2004 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBret
WTF? Drugs vs alcohol....I think it's clear Jamal's crime is worse.

Alcohol IS a drug. One of the most addictive...

2bikemike 10-09-2004 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260
My point is that there's a sound *reason* for murder to be illegal. It infringes on the rights of innocent citizens.

Consumption of cocaine harms no one but the consumer.

The only problem I see with this argument is that if legalized cocaine harms the consumer it opens the door for those greedy bastages called trial lawyers who want to sue every body from cigarrette companies to Gun manufacturers. Under a product liability case.


BTW I would like to see all kinds of stuff legalized and taxed. End the billions of dollars wasted on fighting it. Make a little revenue from it and spend that money on education and treatment programs There by creating more jobs.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.