ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Ashley Ambrose, our new CB? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=118629)

RedThat 06-28-2005 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler
There isnt anyone that is going to knock anyone's socks off available for what the Chiefs can pay.

If Ambrose is the one with the most skill in the workouts, then thats who they will take. In any case, it will still be better than Julian Battle/Dexter Mcleon starting in my opinion.

That's exactly what I mean. they're going to get a guy coming in for cheap, to play for them. I don't expect him to be good. I hope he's a bargain, and surprise. You never know? At the very least I just hope he's better than McCleon and Battle.

jspchief 06-28-2005 08:04 AM

I would prefer Beasley. He'll make a quality nickel after Warfield gets back, so he's not just a band-aid, he's a legitimate addition to the team.

Ambrose probably excites me the least. I guess we can line him up against Rod Smith and we'll have a mini Old Timers game right there at Incestco.

RedThat 06-28-2005 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beer bacon
I would take past performance in games over a workout performance.

I would go with both. Past performances in games and workouts. If Ambrose was good in the workouts, and has game experience for the vet minimum? I guess that is there best shot. He does have a probowl, which is good.

chagrin 06-28-2005 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can
sweet, he was in the pro bowl....a decade ago...anyone got Merton Hanks number?

Merton Hanks...HAHAHA!!
ROFL

He can do that wild monkey dance in the end one or whenever he makes a tackle...forget the worm Chiefs Fans!!

RedThat 06-28-2005 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
I would prefer Beasley. He'll make a quality nickel after Warfield gets back, so he's not just a band-aid, he's a legitimate addition to the team.

Ambrose probably excites me the least. I guess we can line him up against Rod Smith and we'll have a mini Old Timers game right there at Incestco.

Line up Ambrose against Lelie or Rice. Rod Smith has been a Chiefs killer, he must be stopped, and Patrick Surtain is the remedy.

Eleazar 06-28-2005 08:12 AM

DoooOOOoooOOoooOOOOOOOOoOOOOooommed!!!

Chiefnj 06-28-2005 08:14 AM

DeWayne Washington was able to play in 16 games last year for a good Jax defense.

Wallcrawler 06-28-2005 08:15 AM

Yeah, that Rod Smith is a real pain in the ass. I freaking hate seeing #80 on the field against the Chiefs. At least this season we will have someone other than Warfield to try to match up with him.


Ambrose could handle Rice, I dont know if his 34 year old legs could keep up with Lelie all game though. That guy is pretty fast.

jspchief 06-28-2005 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull
Line up Ambrose against Lelie or Rice. Rod Smith has been a Chiefs killer, he must be stopped, and Patrick Surtain is the remedy.

Uhhh, Yea. My comment was meant more as a facetious commentary on their age than an actual suggestion for a gameplan. :rolleyes:

tomahawk kid 06-28-2005 08:29 AM

This is, of course, all assuming that Warfield is going to be suspended the first 4 games.

There's (supposedly) already rumors floating that the suspension will only be 2 games, which makes me much more comfortable with signing Ambrose.

Like many on this board have already stated, I think the Chiefs are better off the longer this plays out.

KChiefs1 06-28-2005 08:31 AM

Quote:

Ambrose probably excites me the least. I guess we can line him up against Rod Smith
I don't think the Chiefs signed Patrick Surtain to line up against Lelie this year do you? :shake:

tomahawk kid 06-28-2005 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj
DeWayne Washington was able to play in 16 games last year for a good Jax defense.

That's what I thought.

Makes me wonder if maybe the Chiefs have heard something regarding Warfield's suspension (or lack thereof).

Perhaps now they're looking for a nickel replacement (Ambrose) for less money, instead of a potential starter replacement (Washington) that could want more $.

Just a thought......

the Talking Can 06-28-2005 08:35 AM

fwi..Roaf was in that 1996 pro bowl...how amazing is he?

jspchief 06-28-2005 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1
I don't think the Chiefs signed Patrick Surtain to line up against Lelie this year do you? :shake:

See post #39

Nice that you edited out the part of the quote that makes it a joke. :rolleyes:

ct 06-28-2005 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wallcrawler
You have to pay for talent guys.

All of you still living in the wet dream that Ty Law is going to go against everything he has said this whole time and just take the vet minimum and play for the Chiefs need to wake the hell up.

The Chiefs cant afford to add another top flight player, or this offseason with the way it has gone, Im sure they would have.

We got 3 former pro bowlers and the most decorated linebacker in the draft. Thats four top caliber players in one offseason.

Thats way more than ANYONE ever expected from the Chiefs. Anyone else added for depth on this team right now is gravy.

When youre paying the Vet Minimum, youre not going to be adding superstar players. Besides, think about this. Ambrose will be brought in to replace JULIAN BATTLE. A scrub who has done jack so far during his time with the Chiefs, and before the season started was a bit of a longshot to even make the team.

At the very least on this Ambrose deal if it happens, we break even. Im quite sure that Ambrose still has enough talent to match what Julian Battle could have done this season.

:clap:
Most excellent points!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.