The other two are younger and were not a part of the Saints horrid secondary for the past two seasons. Though he could still be a servicable nickle and unlike Bartee, can make the occasional pick.

I'd have much preferred Beasley, then Washington, then Ambrose out of the 4 we brought in for a look. But for those of you who say Beasley and Washington would also have been on the cheap, we really don't know this do we? I think that Beasley in particular has good justification in setting his price much over the vet minimum.

Ever since my AH bled profusely after forking over $$ for season tix two years ago. We've had this discussion before my friend.
It's kind of like how I now root for KU after looking up their cheerleaders skirts at the Phog on one wonderful Saturday afternoon.

Can't argue w/ dat!

I thought that one poor little blonde cheerleader was saying, "read my lips..no more baskets", gotta love the courtside view, and I don't mean the lips on her face :whackit:

Jesus H. Christ. All he is, is insurance. Do you really think we could afford Law?

Okay...
 

My thoughts exactly.

Don't worry. I think your table breaking/forum busting post is beautiful.

Heh, my HTML is a little rusty. Do you know what happend there?

No idea, but it was completely unique. I have never seen the breakage creep out to the side of the page like that!

I was joking, as is the tone of probably 95% of my posts.

.

Better than Battle.. thats the only reason we signed him anyway

I'm fine with it. We needed another experienced body at CB, and Ambrose provides it.

The only thing I'll say is I would have preferred Beasley because I think he would have been a noted improvement at nickel once Warfield returned. Hopefully Ambrose can beat out McCleon.