ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Lions release Rogers (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=146755)

Demonpenz 09-02-2006 12:27 PM

eh if kennison or parker gets hurt damn we probably don't make it to 8 wins. Better draft pick

chief4life 09-02-2006 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
My opinion is that it depends on how many WRs we carry on the roster.

If we carry 5, I'd consider Rogers over Hannon. But if we only carry 4, I don't want to expose Webb to waivers.

The other problem is that we don't really use a 4 WR set because Gonzo is always our 4th WR. So wee need our backup WRs to be STs contributors, and there's no way that Rogers would be useful on STs.

Carl said on the radio they are keeping 5 wrs but he didnt obviously say which ones. Im thinking Kennison, Parker, Hall, Webb, and Hannon.

I say bring in Rogers I don't think he could hurt anything.

Mecca 09-02-2006 12:44 PM

Webb and Hannon would be so blah......they better be signing someone if it's 5.

Adept Havelock 09-02-2006 01:04 PM

What's the obsession with signing a WR who has only shown he has serious substance abuse issues through college and the pros?

Oh, and that he has very brittle collarbones.

Yeah, a lazy pothead. That's just what this offense needs. No thanks. I'd rather take a chance with what we've got than a WR with "upside" like that.

Not to mention jspchief's point that the guy's IQ is measured in low double digits.

Charles Rogers<=Todd Marinovich

Mr. Laz 09-02-2006 01:06 PM

which would be better ..... claim rogers off of waivers to keep him locked into current contract and force the lions to eat the signing bonus immediately

or

have to worry about signing him as a regular free agent?

Adept Havelock 09-02-2006 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
which would be better ..... claim rogers off of waivers to keep him locked into current contract and force the lions to eat the signing bonus immediately

or

have to worry about signing him as a regular free agent?

Option C- Forget about signing this turd.

Mecca 09-02-2006 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adept Havelock
What's the obsession with signing a WR who has only shown he has serious substance abuse issues through college and the pros?

Oh, and that he has very brittle collarbones.

Yeah, a lazy pothead. That's just what this offense needs. No thanks. I'd rather take a chance with what we've got than a WR with "upside" like that.

Not to mention jspchief's point that the guy's IQ is measured in low double digits.

Charles Rogers<=Todd Marinovich

Once again I ask...have you seen the WR's on this team? Like I said every player cut this time of year is going to have an issue but with our team Rogers is worth the risk. If you honestly would rather have Jeff Webb and Chris Hannon than Charles Rogers, don't turn around and bitch that we don't have any WR depth or haven't had a #1 WR in 30 years, because this kind of attitude is part of that reason.

By the way his collarbone he broke twice has a steel plate over it now after the surgery he had so that is a moot point now I seriously doubt it will ever be broken again.

Mecca 09-02-2006 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adept Havelock
Option C- Forget about signing this turd.

He's a better turd than our turds......seriously Jeff Webb and Chris Hannon...did you not watch preseason games?

jspchief 09-02-2006 01:14 PM

I'm sure he's awesome. Just look a what he did in college.

Sincerely,
Ryan Leaf

Mr. Laz 09-02-2006 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adept Havelock
Option C- Forget about signing this turd.

so you don't think that Rogers is better than Nate curry?

jspchief 09-02-2006 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
so you don't think that Rogers is better than Nate curry?

I think Nate Curry is less likely to break a collarbone or get suspended for smoking pot.

Mecca 09-02-2006 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz
so you don't think that Rogers is better than Nate curry?

We apparently have the best WR's in the league and don't need to add anyone...... :rolleyes:

This board has a real knack for falling in love with guys who are never will be's in the NFL. Chris Horn and Marc Boerigter have been replaced with Jeff Webb and Chris Hannon this year. And next year they'll be a couple more.

Mecca 09-02-2006 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jspchief
I think Nate Curry is less likely to break a collarbone or get suspended for smoking pot.

He has STEEL PLATE over his collarbone.....he's less likely to break that than just about anyone right now.

Brock 09-02-2006 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca
This board has a real knack for falling in love with guys who are never will be's in the NFL.

I agree. What is this fascination with proven failures like Charles Rogers?

jspchief 09-02-2006 01:24 PM

WTF has Charles Rogers done in the NFL to make the Chiefs want him?

He's played 14 out of a possible 48 games. He's caught 36 passes in 3 years. He's been busted for smoking pot and was suspected to be smoking pot just before the draft.

What the hell is the selling point? The guy is a ****up and a bust? What he did in college is irrelevant at this point. If that's the basis for signing him, we should get Tony fucking Mandarich too.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.