ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   What should it have been (BCS) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=175865)

Valiant 12-03-2007 02:38 PM

Should have said **** it and pitted MU against KU again in the Orange...

Molitoth 12-03-2007 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GRCOAT
Because there would be 4 to 5 Big 10 teams in the BCS every year.


SO this years decision of MU getting kicked out of the BCS bowl games is legit?

bkkcoh 12-03-2007 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valiant
Should have said **** it and pitted MU against KU again in the Orange...

That couldn't have taken place without screwing OU.

If a conference is deserving of having 3 teams in the BCS Bowls, it should have.

As I have said in a previous post, there is a possibility that a conference could have an undefeated team win the conference championship and have 2 other teams only have 1 loss. How shafted would the team with the 1 loss feel in that case.

The BCS only works if there are 2 undeated teams from any of the 6 BCS conferences. :banghead:

Quote:

Originally Posted by GRCOAT
Because there would be 4 to 5 Big 10 teams in the BCS every year.

Very seldom is there 4 to 5 really good teams in any of the BCS conferences.

Even this year only OSU was the only team that had a better then average year, and even at that, it is questionable because of the strength of schedule. Granted, that could be said for a lot of the collegiate teams this year. Teams need to be punished for going to the bakery for thier schedules. And yes I know that schedules are made years in advance, but scheduling mid-level teams from the MAC can't be counted on to be good quality competition. Can they?

ChiefsCountry 12-03-2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth
SO this years decision of MU getting kicked out of the BCS bowl games is legit?

Its the right decision but wrong team. If you saw my post - go down the BCS rankings and take the teams from there.

Molitoth 12-03-2007 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkkcoh
That couldn't have taken place without screwing OU.

If a conference is deserving of having 3 teams in the BCS Bowls, it should have.

As I have said in a previous post, there is a possibility that a conference could have an undefeated team win the conference championship and have 2 other teams only have 1 loss. How shafted would the team with the 1 loss feel in that case.

The BCS only works if there are 2 undeated teams from any of the 6 BCS conferences. :banghead:

Exactly. The system is flawed. We need a playoff system.

BWillie 12-03-2007 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2
Here's what you got:
Sugar: Hawaii v. Georgia

Fiesta: West Virginia v. Oklahoma

Orange: Virginia Tech v. Kansas

Rose: USC v. Illinois

BCS National Championship: Ohio St. v. LSU

Which matchups would you have preferred?

The BSC should look like this...

FIRST ROUND December 15th

Ohio State
Hawaii

Kansas
Oklahoma

Virginia Tech
Missouri

LSU
USC

SEMI FINALS December 22nd

FINAL FOUR December 29th

BSC NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP January 5th


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.