ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Let the controversy begin (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=189174)

Sam Hall 10-14-2008 09:18 AM

I'd be concerned about the Lions ending with a worse record than the Chiefs. Their schedule has mostly playoff-caliber teams. They would draft Stafford with the top pick.

SBK 10-14-2008 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 5114044)
I'd be concerned about the Lions ending with a worse record than the Chiefs. Their schedule has mostly playoff-caliber teams. They would draft Stafford with the top pick.

Lets hope not. Perhaps we can dream since they drafted Drew Stanton recently....:cuss:

Sam Hall 10-22-2008 01:56 PM

The controversy returns!

Scott Wright's updated mock has the Chiefs selecting at No. 2 and drafting James Laurinitis.

KCUnited 10-22-2008 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 5141593)
The controversy returns!

Scott Wright's updated mock has the Chiefs selecting at No. 2 and drafting James Laurinitis.

**** Detroit.

Sam Hall 10-22-2008 04:27 PM

I seriously doubt Laurinitis would be a popular pick at No. 2. I might trade down if I were the Chiefs at No. 2. Stay in the top 10 and get more picks.

Sam Hall 11-11-2008 12:06 AM

With the third pick in the 2009 NFL draft, Scott Wright, at least for now, thinks the Chiefs will select Sam Bradford. Quarterback, Oklahoma.

http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php

googlegoogle 11-11-2008 08:10 PM

Sam Bradford would be a disaster.

I don't like anything about him.

He's a system guy who plays on a great team so forget the stats.

His mechanics are bleh. His arm is bleh.

Huge mistake. Todd Mcshay's a hack.

Sam Hall 11-11-2008 08:26 PM

Scott Wright might be trying to spice up his mock draft. I have a hard time believing the Chiefs, or any team, would draft Bradford that high. His negatives are going to scare teams. I don't think the Chiefs would take him, period.

The best options at OL and DE are better than Bradford.

Sam Hall 11-21-2008 03:58 PM

Michael Johnson looked good last night. The Chiefs could trade down and get him.

Sam Hall 12-08-2008 03:44 AM

I don't think Bradford would be a bad pick, but I'd still rather have a defensive player. It would be a tough choice if he's on the board when the Chiefs pick. However, the Chiefs have a brutal 2009 schedule, and Bradford might look even better after another year at OU. I'd not worried about his arm strength after what people said about Matt Ryan.

googlegoogle 12-08-2008 10:23 PM

We have a qb. I think we take Orakpo. I need to see more vid of him though. His 40 times are all over the place. Has good vertical.

If he has the burst then TAKE HIM!

sign Suggs too.

Sam Hall 12-09-2008 02:24 AM

To the delight of many, Scott Wright has written that James Laurinitis has seen his stock drop. He's now a mid-first round or later pick. A couple linebackers could get drafted before him. It's time to eliminate him from this controversy.

DrRyan 01-03-2009 10:43 AM

I think drafting Stafford would be the worst possible decision the Chiefs could make. Tell me, does this sound familiar?: "Born with a rocket launcher for a right arm... Puts too much zip on the football on intermediate and crossing routes ... Doesn't show an understanding to audible into the correct pass protection or diagnose coverages."

http://www.walterfootball.com/pro2009mstafford.php

Read all the scouting reports you need, they all pretty much say the same thing. Lazer rocket arm, questionable decision maker. JaMarcus Russell anyone? Can you tell me that last time that a guy with a rocket arm drafted early turned out great?

Matt Ryan has a good arm, but makes really good decisions(thus far). The most glaring need/weakness for the Chiefs right now is a pass rush and linebackers. The secondary picked a ton of balls this year considering opposing passer had an eternity of time to throw the ball.

Tribal Warfare 01-03-2009 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrRyan (Post 5351482)

Read all the scouting reports you need, they all pretty much say the same thing. Lazer rocket arm, questionable decision maker. JaMarcus Russell anyone? Can you tell me that last time that a guy with a rocket arm drafted early turned out great?

Have you seen him play? He plays nothing like Russell, in second half in his bowl game the kid was in the zone. Stafford is definitely a option for a franchise QB.

DrRyan 01-03-2009 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare (Post 5351504)
Have you seen him play? He plays nothing like Russell, in second half in his bowl game the kid was in the zone. Stafford is definitely a option for a franchise QB.

Yes, I have seen him play three or four games this year and a number of games last year. I have watched him underachieve in most all of them. In each game with the exception of maybe against Florida, the talent around him has been superior to the team he was playing, but still Georgia is one of the biggest underachieving teams in college football this year. I would much rather have a QB that understands how to read a defense than one who thinks he can just throw the ball past him. He is a vastly over-rated QB. Go ahead and compare Stafford to Russell after each of their first three years in the league, hell, take it five years into the league if you would like and then tell me how different they are.

No sir, have YOU actually read any of his scouting reports? Every single one of them I have seen says almost the exact same thing. Great arm, questionable decision making. Sounds like a recipe for a first round bust to me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.