ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU Mizzou @ Nebraska (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=192331)

|Zach| 09-23-2008 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 5047175)
Pelini coached the defense that allowed MU to turn the tide. I was at that game and appreciated the gesture.

Hell I still have the chunk of FG from that game.

It is usually on the coffee table at our house.

http://zachishere.com/picts/goalpost.JPG

ChiefsCountry 09-23-2008 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 5047175)
Pelini coached the defense that allowed MU to turn the tide. I was at that game and appreciated the gesture.

That was a magical night in Columbia. Best game I ever been at.

|Zach| 09-23-2008 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5047279)
That was a magical night in Columbia. Best game I ever been at.

I would have to agree...because of the game and also reasons beyond the game.

But yea.

duncan_idaho 09-23-2008 01:04 PM

My early line for the game:

Missouri 45, Nebraska 24

Nebraska still lacks the pass rush up front and the speed in the back seven to really give a great spread o trouble. You have to be able to pressure the passer with four and drop seven to have consistent success against a spread team, and I don't think Nebraska has all of that.

Defensively, Missouri needs to do two things: 1) Get William Moore healthy (two weeks off should help that); 2) Dial back the blitzes in its Tampa 2.

I know DC Matt Eberflus has been working on a new scheme (designed around a hybrid safety/backer playing the nickel slot) based on the Tampa D, and I am hearing some underground rumblings he was experimenting with it a lot and the blitzing aspect of it in the nonconference schedule. I would be surprised if Missouri continues to blitz as much as it has so far this season.

One final thing: Because of the efficiency and quick-strike ability of Missouri's offense, the defense is facing more possessions and more total plays than almost every other team; total yards is a bad barometer in that situation. Missouri's yards-per-play through the non-con this year actually are much better than they were a season ago - and the scoring defense is improved.

Spott 09-23-2008 02:41 PM

Chase Daniel is on Jim Rome's show right now.

Frazod 09-23-2008 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 5047585)
Chase Daniel is on Jim Rome's show right now.

Please tell me that he's taller than Jim Rome. LMAO

CoMoChief 09-23-2008 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsus (Post 5047237)
Missouri hasn't had a team like this years team and Nebraska has not been this bad very often. So yes we haven't won there since 1978 but over that timespan Missouri was a pretty bad team for the most part and Nebraska was a powerhouse. Big difference this year.

And if they play defense like they did last weekend? Last weekend was their best defensive showing so far this year. 3 fumbles by the offense and a kick return for a touchdown was what allowed Buffalo to stay in the game for a while. Of course you would actually have to have followed the game to know that instead of just looking at the score.

I was at the game but anyways..... :rolleyes:

Spott 09-23-2008 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5047609)
Please tell me that he's taller than Jim Rome. LMAO

Couldn't tell, he wasn't on via satellite from Columbia. He definitely doesn't act as annoying as Rome.

Frazod 09-23-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 5047614)
Couldn't tell, he wasn't on via satellite from Columbia. He definitely doesn't act as annoying as Rome.

Well, who does?

redbrian 09-23-2008 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5047615)
Well, who does?

keitzman on 810, by far.....at least Rome has a grasp on reality...

Bearcat 09-23-2008 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 5047614)
Couldn't tell, he wasn't on via satellite from Columbia. He definitely doesn't act as annoying as Rome.

I turned it on and they were just about done, but Rome seemed to be stumbling his way through it. Daniel gave some stats that made me think he was better prepared than Rome.

Rome: ...when you play in, uh on, uh... Lincoln. ...the sea of red, 65, 75, 85 thousand people in Lincoln.

:spock:

Frazod 09-23-2008 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redbrian (Post 5047621)
keitzman on 810, by far.....at least Rome has a grasp on reality...

Never heard Keitzman. From what I've read here, I'm thinking that's a good thing.

redbrian 09-23-2008 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 5047630)
Never heard Keitzman. From what I've read here, I'm thinking that's a good thing.

count yourself lucky........the guy is the biggest ass on radio......

Demonpenz 09-23-2008 03:39 PM

kietzman is schmoozy, plays alot of golf, reminds me of a guy that thought he was cool but isn't, then ok you have all that schmooze ohhhhh look at my yaght kind of voice and arragance, then he stirs up shit every radio station. I understand that is what gets the
ratings, but damn it can piss you off somedays. Then he has control of the button and so he can cut you off, but mostly he atleast knows what he has said over the years. He does atleast drum up some outrage for carl and for the some of the royals stuff.

InChiefsHeaven 09-23-2008 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyCoffey (Post 5047245)
but, but - I can say the same thing about my Tigers.... Don't take THAT away from ME!!!111!!

I hear ya. I for one am glad that many Chiefs fans at least have the Tigers...but I ain't one of them. Woe is me. What ever shall I do??!!?? :deevee:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.