ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Fewest yards of offense (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=193458)

Red Brooklyn 10-06-2008 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alpha_omega (Post 5087540)
I just had to go back and look....i guess this is the game in question...

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...8610120cle.htm

wow... well at least the Chiefs scored some points in that contest.

triple 10-06-2008 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn (Post 5087634)
wow... well at least the Chiefs scored some points in that contest.

well, that team was 3-3 at the time.

BigChiefFan 10-06-2008 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 5087442)
This is a great opportunity for legitimate Herm bashing, but your statement is pure horseshit. As inept as he is right now, Herm didn't destroy the offense. It was bound to fall no matter who was coaching. Herm deserves to be roasted, but definitely not for this....

I disagree. I'm not implying the offense would have remained a juggernaut, but there is no question, that Herm CHANGED the offensive philosophy. Let's also not forget that Herm, himself, IMPLIED the same thing. Don't you remember all the "offense will remain the same" bullshit he spouted went he first got here. Clearly it wasn't and one, Mr. Solari took the fall for HERM'S conservative and neutered approach, now look at Gailey's IDENTICAL APPROACH, same conservative, PREDICTABLE approach.


Don't confuse changing offensive philosophy with offensive player personel changing. Argueing about the effectiveness of the offense with the loss of Roaf and Shields, etc.. is an entirely different argument and one that I can see coming into the discussion, but I think you'll find it impossible to argue against what is being said, because I'm using HERM as the source that STATED, he DID NOT NEED TO CHANGE the OFFENSE.

2bikemike 10-06-2008 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 5087442)
This is a great opportunity for legitimate Herm bashing, but your statement is pure horseshit. As inept as he is right now, Herm didn't destroy the offense. It was bound to fall no matter who was coaching. Herm deserves to be roasted, but definitely not for this....

Exactly, That falls at the feet of CP the other half of the idiot tandem that needs to go. He let the O-line get old without addressing it. I guess he thought Shields and Roaf could play great well into their 40's.

InChiefsHeaven 10-06-2008 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 5087309)
Actually, I thought the Oakland game was the joke. Does a shut out top QB roullette (sp?)?

Against a bitter rival...good point. I don't know which was worse...:shake:

Ultra Peanut 10-06-2008 11:19 AM

When we're matching records of futility that some of our players weren't even alive to experience, well, that's something.

Chiefnj2 10-06-2008 11:24 AM

Herm killed the offense. Yeah, it was going to slide a bit, but it didn't need to bottom out like Amy Winehouse on crack.

Rausch 10-06-2008 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5087764)
Herm killed the offense. Yeah, it was going to slide a bit, but it didn't need to bottom out like Amy Winehouse on crack.

It's like there's some DV/Herm matter and antimatter...

Fish 10-06-2008 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5087677)
I disagree. I'm not implying the offense would have remained a juggernaut, but there is no question, that Herm CHANGED the offensive philosophy. Let's also not forget that Herm, himself, IMPLIED the same thing. Don't you remember all the "offense will remain the same" bullshit he spouted went he first got here. Clearly it wasn't and one, Mr. Solari took the fall for HERM'S conservative and neutered approach, now look at Gailey's IDENTICAL APPROACH, same conservative, PREDICTABLE approach.


Don't confuse changing offensive philosophy with offensive player personel changing. Argueing about the effectiveness of the offense with the loss of Roaf and Shields, etc.. is an entirely different argument and one that I can see coming into the discussion, but I think you'll find it impossible to argue against what is being said, because I'm using HERM as the source that STATED, he DID NOT NEED TO CHANGE the OFFENSE.

You can't separate the offensive philosophy from the player personnel. It doesn't work that way. You can't implement an offensive philosophy, even a very successful offensive philosophy, without the correct player personnel to run it. If you want proof of this, simply look at Jesus Saunders' handiwork after he left here. Without the right personnel, the best offensive philosophy in the world will fail.

They made an attempt to run the same style of offense. But they couldn't because we had no decent talent waiting after Roaf and Shields left. You can't coach up reeruns like Kyle Turley and Chris Terry, and expect the same results as Willie Roaf and Will Shields.

Remember, Solari is the one that coached Roaf and Shields. But for some reason, the offensive line fell apart after those 2 left. Even though Solari was still here.

El Pendejo 10-06-2008 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rad (Post 5087063)
DeAngelo Williams had more yards than the Chiefs' total net offense?

Really?

I believe so. Looking at the espn box score...

Williams 148
Chiefs 127

HemiEd 10-06-2008 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 5087767)
It's like there's some DV/Herm matter and antimatter...

It has been about Herm's ego since the day he arrived.

Oh Snap 10-06-2008 01:31 PM

thats a far cry from the 590 yards of offense we put up against the colts back in 04. :( Kinda miss those days..

Bearcat 10-06-2008 04:20 PM

The sad thing is that it's not 'rock bottom'... it's been going on since he's been here. That's one game per season with about 125 yards of offense each. :doh!:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 5084779)
@Carolina, 34-0
Yards -- 127 (was 92 with 2:00 left) to 441
First Downs -- 6 to 20
ToP -- 18 to 38

@Denver 12/9/07, 41-7
Yards -- 129 to 453
First Downs -- 7 to 23
ToP -- 25 to 35

@Colts 1/6/07, 23-8
Yards -- 126 to 435
First Downs -- 7 to 28
ToP -- 20 to 40


(we had over 200 yards vs. the Steelers in '06 and 190 against Oakland a few weeks ago)


smittysbar 10-06-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 5088812)
The sad thing is that it's not 'rock bottom'... it's been going on since he's been here. That's one game per season with about 125 yards of offense each. :doh!:

at least he is consistent......wonder about when he was with the jets?

Long Duk Dong 10-06-2008 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 5087411)
The offense needs to help out the defense. They do that by getting off the field quickly, allowing the defense more reps.

:clap: ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.