ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs All kidding aside, #3 pick? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200929)

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5419130)
That means he's supposed to catch the ball, right?

And that hes kind of big and slow.

DaWolf 01-23-2009 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5419130)
That means he's supposed to catch the ball, right?

ROFL:doh!:

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 5419062)
I'm of the belief that we might actually be able to trade down to #10 (San Francisco might want to get in front of Seattle in order to grab Sanchez or Stafford.) If we do this, then I'd like to see us get a guy like Maulauga from USC. If we stay at #3, I'm a fan of drafting the best tackle available so that we can set our tackles for the next 10 years. If we don't keep improving the line, we're going to struggle to keep QB's healthy.

If i could choose between Stafford and Sanchez, I'll take Sanchez hands down. He's more mobile and yeah, he's only been a starter for 1 year, but the kid's a leader and a winner. I like his attitude.

I am tired of reading these statements. Brandon Albert is our LT, period. You don't draft a RT with the 3rd pick.

Mr. Laz 01-23-2009 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5419082)
If CoMo doesnt like a guy its a good sign to take him.

truth

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 5419157)
I am tired of reading these statements. Brandon Albert is our LT, period. You don't draft a RT with the 3rd pick.

The LT we drafted #3 would be our LT, not RT. I think we should leave Albert at LT, but he wasn't Pioli's pick or our HC's(assuming the axe falls on Herm). They can easily move Albert to guard if they feel hes best there and want thier LT of the future. Its a whole different story if we still had Carl and Herm though.

CupidStunt 01-23-2009 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419172)
The LT we drafted #3 would be our LT, not RT. I think we should leave Albert at LT, but he wasn't Pioli's pick or our HC's(assuming the axe falls on Herm). They can easily move Albert to guard if they feel hes best there and want thier LT of the future. Its a whole different story if we still had Carl and Herm though.

If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

BigChiefFan 01-23-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419185)
If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

3rd pick is greater than the 15th pick-your logic flawed.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419172)
The LT we drafted #3 would be our LT, not RT. I think we should leave Albert at LT, but he wasn't Pioli's pick or our HC's(assuming the axe falls on Herm). They can easily move Albert to guard if they feel hes best there and want thier LT of the future. Its a whole different story if we still had Carl and Herm though.

That's what I said. There is no need to move Albert to guard, Pioli isn't going to move him.

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419185)
If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

What if he thinks Albert can the like Will Shields and he thinks whoever we draft could be like Willie Roaf? What if he thinks Albert is just some above average LT?

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lj4mvp (Post 5419185)
If Pioli's as good at evaluating talent as we think, there ain't no way he's spending a top pick and $60 million on a tackle to "upgrade" Albert, therefore he would be spending the pick on a RT.

Im quoting this to show my approval of this message.

RustShack 01-23-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcchiefsfanGoLJ (Post 5419205)
That's what I said. There is no need to move Albert to guard, Pioli isn't going to move him.

You have no idea how Pioli or our HC will think.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-23-2009 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefBrad (Post 5419067)
Draft Curry or Crabtree

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419141)
And that hes kind of big and slow.

Yes, "Fitz-Mania" has staunched the flow of blood to the brain due to the collective man-crush/hard on experienced by some fans.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419206)
What if he thinks Albert can the like Will Shields and he thinks whoever we draft could be like Willie Roaf? What if he thinks Albert is just some above average LT?

Will Shields was found in the third round IIRC. You don't waste a top 5 pick on a guard.

El Jefe 01-23-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5419210)
You have no idea how Pioli or our HC will think.

He IS NOT going to move him, why would he move him? Albert is fine at his position, what philosphy could they bring in that would hinder Albert at LT??

CupidStunt 01-23-2009 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 5419202)
3rd pick is greater than the 15th pick-your logic flawed.

You missed the point. Albert is going to be a damn good LT, and Pioli will see that.

Andre Smith is NOT better than Albert.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.