ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 7 12 3 4567
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   First Round Pick (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202143)

NickAthanFan 02-10-2009 11:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyHawk69 (Post 5476322)
There are only four players worth the third pick in the draft.
  1. Matthew Stafford QB Georgia
    Andre Smith OT Alabama
    Aaron Curry LB Wake Forest
    Michael Crabtree WR Texas Tech

I think Detroit takes Stafford and St Louis takes Smith. So that leaves us Crabtree and Curry. I think there will be a big debate about who to take, but I believe we take Curry. There is alot of talk of Michael Johson the DE from Georgia Tech dropping to the beginning of the second round if this happens I think we would take him.

Any thoughts?
I have two thoughts. 1. Kick yourself in the balls until you can no longer stand up. Then have someone else continue kicking your balls until they can no longer stand. 2. Give me $110 so I can re-educate you.

Ebolapox 02-11-2009 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickAthanFan (Post 5478383)
I have two thoughts. 1. Kick yourself in the balls until you can no longer stand up. Then have someone else continue kicking your balls until they can no longer stand. 2. Give me $110 so I can re-educate you.
I close my eyes; only for a moment, then the moment's gone.

melbar 02-11-2009 12:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5478221)
I think anyone with a brain wouldn't chose a cover linebacker with the number three overall pick.
The same brains that wanted Gholston top 5 last year...

Anyway the guy is more than just a cover corner. If he's good player and there arent 5 guys better than him (pretty much the universal view of his talent) then he is a consideration. I dont hear the Steelers complaining about having supperior linebacker play. DT didnt hurt us at #4 either.

Its not like he's a Guard or anything....:D

melbar 02-11-2009 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickAthanFan (Post 5478383)
I have two thoughts. 1. Kick yourself in the balls until you can no longer stand up. Then have someone else continue kicking your balls until they can no longer stand. 2. Give me $110 so I can re-educate you.

Seriously your man love for Sanchez so taints your view that you think his entire list isnt valid? Sanchez or nothing?

philfree 02-11-2009 01:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5478221)
I think anyone with a brain wouldn't chose a cover linebacker with the number three overall pick.
250 lb cover LB? The only place I've seen that is on chiefsplanet.

PhilFree:arrow:

Mecca 02-11-2009 02:17 AM
If you take Aaron Curry that high there is no way for him to ever justify his pick, he'd literally have to be a 15 sack player and he's not that kind of LB..

So now you're looking at Keith Bulluck or Derrick Brooks and even if he became that...having the best non rushing OLB in the league is like saying you're the smartest person with down syndrome.

El Jefe 02-11-2009 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5476946)
I personally think there's 3 players the Chiefs can justify taking 3rd..

Stafford, Sanchez and Malcolm Jenkins, that's it.
THIS.

the Talking Can 02-11-2009 08:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5478020)
Sanchez either goes to us or late teens/20's in every draft. NFL Live was saying again that because of Ryan and Flacco teams are gonna reach for QB's who shouldnt be drafted so high.

Curry is a 5 star prospect on every evaluation I've seen thus far outside of the QB at all cost crowd on this BB. He's also being called the best LB prospect in years. I really think people are dogging him to bolster their QB at any cost argument.
he isn't as good as patrick willis, imo...and that dude went 11th....

Ware went 11th....is he as good as him?

Merriman went 12th....is he really as good as him?

honest questions...

BigCatDaddy 02-11-2009 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5478733)
he isn't as good as patrick willis, imo...and that dude went 11th....

Ware went 11th....is he as good as him?

Merriman went 12th....is he really as good as him?

honest questions...
No he is not.

That being said, doesn't it appear the rushing OLB's are being undervalued in the first round?

the Talking Can 02-11-2009 11:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 5479545)
No he is not.

That being said, doesn't it appear the rushing OLB's are being undervalued in the first round?
a bit, yes...

but if you aren't a rush backer, or a stud MLB, then it is hard to see top 5 value....which appears to be the case here...

Micjones 02-11-2009 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5477978)
I will flip shit if the Chiefs take Malcolm Jenkins 3rd overall.
Me too.

BigCatDaddy 02-11-2009 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Talking Can (Post 5479586)
a bit, yes...

but if you aren't a rush backer, or a stud MLB, then it is hard to see top 5 value....which appears to be the case here...
MLB it's tough to justify. But if it's considered good value to take a 4-3 DE in the top of a draft, I would think a 3-4 OLB would be considered high value. Who would you rather have a Ware or healthy Merricman or would you rahter have the best WR or best RB in the league (take your pick).

milkman 02-11-2009 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 5479791)
MLB it's tough to justify. But if it's considered good value to take a 4-3 DE in the top of a draft, I would think a 3-4 OLB would be considered high value. Who would you rather have a Ware or healthy Merricman or would you rahter have the best WR or best RB in the league (take your pick).
Unless that WR is Larry Fitzgerald or that RB is Adrian Peterson, then I'd take Ware everytime.

BigCatDaddy 02-11-2009 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5479802)
Unless that WR is Larry Fitzgerald or that RB is Adrian Peterson, then I'd take Ware everytime.
I don't think I would take either of them over Ware or a healthy Merriman, as great of players as they are.

But you get the point. RB's and WR are often consider top 5 picks, so why shouldn't an OLB in a 3-4?

milkman 02-11-2009 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 5479829)
I don't think I would take either of them over Ware or a healthy Merriman, as great of players as they are.

But you get the point. RB's and WR are often consider top 5 picks, so why shouldn't an OLB in a 3-4?
I can't argue for or against Curry.

I haven't seen enough of him to draw any conclusions.

However, if he isn't a guy who can get double digit sacks on a regular basis, as some have suggested, then he wouldn't be a top 5 value pick.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 PM.
Page 3 of 7 12 3 4567
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.