then give up .... grab a shotgun ... shoot yourself in face


rinse and repeat as many times needed

HERE YE HERE YE!!

Only approved subjects will be discussed on the Red planet!

1st approved subject:

Is Sanchez hair A Luxurious
or mearly B Silky smooth



Your right, this will be much more fun....:thumb:

Here's the point a lot of people are missing.

Just because you draft a QB in the 1st doesnt necessarily mean you have your franchise QB.

In a perfect world yes. Its not that cut and dried.

Nope it doesn't and if that happens you pick another one in a few years...

You can not have this huge fear of it because you need one.

I'd seriously rather have to take a top 5 QB twice than have Aaron Curry and some game manager QB that leads us to playoff losses.

I'm just saying because a guy is the best QB this year doesnt mean he's gonna automatically solve the problems. If Pioli and Haley break down the film and interview these 2 guys and dont feel they are what they need they shouldnt draft them just to be taking a QB in the 1st. There have been a lot of "dont draft just for need" arguments here the last several years that have seemingly gone out the window. If its not your guy, you dont draft him. Not saying its one way or the other with these guys, and I hope we get a QB too. You still have to evaluate the individual and the thought that you just draft a QB and our problems are solved isnt right. We're here to discuss all the options. Just because we're including all the elite prospects in the conversation doesnt mean someone is an idiot who should STFU, it means we're on a discussion board so lets look at all the options. ---K tired and rambling..later. :)

I'm not telling you to draft for need I'm telling you it's not smart to overdraft an undervalued position.

If Aaron Curry goes with the 3rd pick he's going to be the highest paid OLB in the game.

Your probably right, but if for some reason P and H dont like either QB who do we draft? One of the 3 or 4 OT's? Orakpo? Who is the next best option is my question.

Then you take Malcolm Jenkins....

If they take Orakpo I will lose my mind.

While it's true that the Chiefs have never drafted a franchise QB, it is also true that the best chance of finding a franchise QB remains a first round selection.

Most of my friends aren't into football or any sports for that matter, that's primarily why I joined The Planet, so I don't talk much football when I'm out. So last night I meet up with my girlfriend and some of her co-workers and I sit with these 2 self proclaimed biggest Chiefs fans in the city. Both these guys where shitting themselves at the thought of drafting a QB at #3. I got everything from trade for Cassel to move Pollard to LB cuz he brings the wood to we got to fix the right side of the line in rd. 1 to **** Carl for trading JA. I couldn't take it any longer and just zoned it out. I'm thinking there maybe something to this tr00 fan thing. It was like watching 2 short bus kids doing an interpretive dance to The Planet.

Yeah, because this is an odd year, and you don't have to take best player available. This is the year you get to draft for need at the 3rd overall pick. Nice!

BPA has to account for positional value, especially in the top 5.

I hear what you and everyone has been saying about that, I do.
But no way am I convinced that Sanchez, playing behind that OL, for one season, can be construed as the best player available at 3.

I hope like hell whomever they draft, QB or not, turns out to be worth it, but Sanchez?

Oh thats right, he played at USC in a pro style offense, done, sign him, championship.

I also get it that the QBOF needs to be on this team soon, very soon.

Have you seen Sanchez play?

Just a couple games, and some highlights. Small sample for sure, but I didn't see anything that impressed me that much.

But as you know, I am sure no expert on great play, having spent most of my viewing hours watching the Chiefs.

Do you think he is cool under pressure? To me that is the key, more than measurables.