Or cheating threads about winking buttholes.

If they ask me an honest question in a learning way that's great, I don't have an issue with that I don't consider them stupid..

There are posters on this forum I think are stupid and I make no bones about it, CoMoChief is like a lab experiment gone bad.

I've tried WPI, very briefly. It's very boring. There are only so many ways to say "Here's what I think the Chiefs should do". I'm sure they're all perfectly nice folks.

OK, thats fair and funny.
You dont spend any time over there so why do you assume their members are dumb?

Well the threads that have been linked that I've read....

I have noticed the threads that are linked over here are of the highest quality?:shake:

Don't worry I make fun of the coalition too, they both had polls about who should be the QB next year and Thigpen had like 150 votes where everyone else was at 10...

I ran into a guy who thinks Michael Crabtree is better than Calvin Johnson, stuff like that.

The humor over here and what I would call "all out" posting is better. Still, its a good board with many good posters just like this one.

I have never understood the animosity between the two.

NO!

2009 n00b class

I dont have any problem w/ WPI. As a matter of fact after actually looking at it, its not as bad as I've heard people make it out to be.

I think some of our members dont like the premium content idea, but thats Scout's issue, not WPI's.

Anyhow, I'm just a Chargers fan so on an outside looking in perspective, it was just funny to me.

.

lol

I signed up over there a couple years ago. It irritated me when people would voice displeasure with the Chiefs and the elder members would crap all over them for it. I don't want any part of a site that won't allow you to voice negative opinions when they are deserved.

Homerism drives me nuts.

And not expressing homerism pisses off the homers it even happens here.