ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   NFL Draft Neither Stafford or Sanchez belong in top 10 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202838)

chiefforlife 02-21-2009 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5512649)
LMAO..

Throwing in shorts and a t-shirt to receivers you've never seen before is now the big stage.

I'll be sure to include this line when I introduce JaMarcus Russell at his HOF induction.

A college player wanting to be an NFL player working out in front of 32 NFL head coaches and GMs is the biggest stage of his career so far.

This IS what the combine is all about, no?

Dave Lane 02-21-2009 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 5512629)
Why would Stafford not throw? I just don't understand it. He has a million dollar arm.

The talent at the top of this draft sucks. It figures the year we are in position to pick up a stud, there might not be there one for the taking.

I want Sanchez, but I can see why people feel that neither is worth a top 10 selection.

The problem is, there aren't many guys in this draft worthy of top 10 picks.

Give me Sanchez and I'll be happy as hell.

this exactly...

Pioli Zombie 02-21-2009 10:37 AM

This is outragous. Don't they know stafford is the next joe montana and sanchez is the next drew bledsoe?
Posted via Mobile Device

milkman 02-21-2009 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5512689)
This is outragous. Don't they know stafford is the next joe montana and sanchez is the next drew bledsoe?
Posted via Mobile Device

Would you like to actually contribute something to this forum someday?

Reerun_KC 02-21-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5512699)
Would you like to actually contribute something to this forum someday?

:clap:

milkman 02-21-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 5512689)
This is outragous. Don't they know stafford is the next joe montana and sanchez is the next drew bledsoe?
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh, and FTR, Pioli smoker, if I knew ahead that Sanchez was the next Bledsoe, I'd want no part of him.

Deberg_1990 02-21-2009 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5512702)
if I knew ahead that Sanchez was the next Bledsoe, I'd want no part of him.

heh, we could argue this one all week long and i understand your point.

But ill say this: This Chiefs team and the early 90's Pats are in very similiar situations.

Bledsoe did pull his franchise out of the muck and went to a Bowl. He was an effective leader for 7 or 8 years.

OnTheWarpath15 02-21-2009 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5512699)
Would you like to actually contribute something to this forum someday?

You're asking an awful lot out of Simple Jack.

kstater 02-21-2009 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5512699)
Would you like to actually contribute something to this forum someday?

What credentials do you have to make that assumption that he doesn't contribute?

DeezNutz 02-21-2009 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 5512721)
What credentials do you have to make that assumption that he doesn't contribute?

Literacy.

OnTheWarpath15 02-21-2009 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5512724)
Literacy.

LMAO

dirk digler 02-21-2009 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MWagg72 (Post 5512648)
Sanchez's agent is his brother so yes, he probably won't do things that are considered normal.

Thanks for pointing that out. Rack that up as stupid decision #1.

After doing some checking he is his first player client ever. Wow I can't say how stupid a decision that is.

Red Beans 02-21-2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cfl (Post 5512617)
I am starting to believe more and more that this isnt the year to spend a #3 pick on a QB.
I hope they are looking farther down in the draft.

Ding ding ding we have a winner folks...This is the year to address our other needs first. That being said there's no reason to think we won't draft a QB in a later round.

milkman 02-21-2009 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 5512743)
Thanks for pointing that out. Rack that up as stupid decision #1.

After doing some checking he is his first player client ever. Wow I can't say how stupid a decision that is.

I can't recall who, but there is another person involved as his agent working with his brother who I believe has previous experience.

DeezNutz 02-21-2009 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Beans (Post 5512751)
Ding ding ding we have a winner folks...This is the year to address our other needs first. That being said there's no reason to think we won't draft a QB in a later round.

What need would you like to address?

1. We have a LT.
2. There isn't an elite DE in the draft (that we know of).
3. There isn't an elite rush backer in the draft (that we know of).

Don't say RT.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.