ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs "Experts" say and think the same as Mecca... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=202998)

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:34 AM

Oh yes I obviously have no idea what I'm talking about....you think that because you disagree with me.

I'm right far more than I'm wrong, my history on this forum speaks to that.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer (Post 5521943)
that would be wonderful. I really do want the Dirty!

They want to solidify the line to protect the QB. Have Culpepper start for the beginning of the season and have rook hold clipboard for a few games.

Face it...if they beat ANYBODY this year they have improved. ROFL

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by missinDThomas (Post 5521928)
Pat White already said he would play other positions, because teams are looking at him for the "wildcat". They think Pat is interesting due to his athleticism and that he would blow the wildcat up. Every comment about him being a fulltime QB is he is way too small.

I am not debating whether he has the size to be a QB. I was merely looking at their performance. And, on Sunday, Pat White looked like a much more polished prospect than Sanchez did.

That is something I would have never anticipated going into Sunday.

Clearly, I would RATHER have Sanchez. I think he has more talent than White by far. The point is that Sanchez had a poor showing. So poor, that Pat White looked better.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5521953)
I am not debating whether he has the size to be a QB. I was merely looking at their performance. And, on Sunday, Pat White looked like a much more polished prospect than Sanchez did.

That is something I would have never anticipated going into Sunday.

Clearly, I would RATHER have Sanchez. I think he has more talent than White by far. The point is that Sanchez had a poor showing. So poor, that Pat White looked better.

How dare you question the experts!

jidar 02-24-2009 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521869)
Why is it ok to blow a 2nd round pick on a QB but not a 1st round pick? If either one busts you just blew a pick with a team that is in a position that it needs both those picks to pan out.

what? Why is it worse to blow $300 instead of $50?

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar (Post 5521955)
what? Why is it worse to blow $300 instead of $50?

Ok why is it ok to make Aaron Curry the highest paid player at his position before he plays a down then?

You don't get a shot at a top QB very often and some people just want to piss it away to rebuild a team that never won.

Gdaddy 02-24-2009 08:40 AM

Do any of you consider that the Chiefs will be trading down from the number 3 pick? I still think its highly likely that the Chiefs Swap with the NE Patriots for Cassel and we then draft at 23. Even if we do not trade with NE we still could be moving down to grab more picks.

SenselessChiefsFan 02-24-2009 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521951)
Oh yes I obviously have no idea what I'm talking about....you think that because you disagree with me.

I'm right far more than I'm wrong, my history on this forum speaks to that.

Yes, I am sure it does. LOL.

Like I said, I don't mind having a different opinion, but it is clear you are talking over your head when discussing mechanics, and footwork.

Frankly, you talked about how wonderful Sanchez would do in the drills because he had all this 'talent'.... and talent and the arm was NEVER the question, and blah blah blah.

He gets out there and falls on his face, and I think you are trying to save face a little talking about how great his mechanics were.

Frankly, he had a much longer delivery than I thought he would have, and he didn't have near the zip on the ball that I expected. I was thoroughly dissapointed.

So, now you want to come off as an expert and discuss something that you don't think anyone will challenge you on.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdaddy (Post 5521960)
Do any of you consider that the Chiefs will be trading down from the number 3 pick? I still think its highly likely that the Chiefs Swap with the NE Patriots for Cassel and we then draft at 23. Even if we do not trade with NE we still could be moving down to grab more picks.

So I should be ready to give up on draft day......I got you.

If they really did that for Cassell I would literally lose my mind.

missinDThomas 02-24-2009 08:42 AM

I think it is hard to trade the top 3 picks now, because it is so much money to sign.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 5521962)
Yes, I am sure it does. LOL.

Like I said, I don't mind having a different opinion, but it is clear you are talking over your head when discussing mechanics, and footwork.

Frankly, you talked about how wonderful Sanchez would do in the drills because he had all this 'talent'.... and talent and the arm was NEVER the question, and blah blah blah.

He gets out there and falls on his face, and I think you are trying to save face a little talking about how great his mechanics were.

Frankly, he had a much longer delivery than I thought he would have, and he didn't have near the zip on the ball that I expected. I was thoroughly dissapointed.

So, now you want to come off as an expert and discuss something that you don't think anyone will challenge you on.

And this is why top prospects are routinely advised to not throw at the combine, exactly what you're doing.

jidar 02-24-2009 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5521958)
Ok why is it ok to make Aaron Curry the highest paid player at his position before he plays a down then?

You don't get a shot at a top QB very often and some people just want to piss it away to rebuild a team that never won.

Yeah I dunno.

For awhile I was operating under the assumption that Sanchez wasn't worth the #3, but I've been looking and now I'm trying to justify who IS worth the #3 and this is a hard question to answer. The fact is, this draft is so shitty that we should start it at pick #10.

What that means is that I wouldn't hate to take Sanchez at #3, but only because everybody else sucks too.

Of all the years to have the #3 pick...

warrior 02-24-2009 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gdaddy (Post 5521960)
Do any of you consider that the Chiefs will be trading down from the number 3 pick? I still think its highly likely that the Chiefs Swap with the NE Patriots for Cassel and we then draft at 23. Even if we do not trade with NE we still could be moving down to grab more picks.


First you need a trade partner going to be hard to find in a draft weak at the top.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jidar (Post 5521970)
Yeah I dunno.

For awhile I was operating under the assumption that Sanchez wasn't worth the #3, but I've been looking and now I'm trying to justify who IS worth the #3 and this is a hard question to answer. The fact is, this draft is so shitty that we should start it at pick #10.

What that means is that I wouldn't hate to take Sanchez at #3, but only because everybody else sucks too.

Of all the years to have the #3 pick...

Well atleast that is an honest opinion that you do realize an OLB isn't worth the 3rd pick.

Mecca 02-24-2009 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warrior (Post 5521973)
First you need a trade partner going to be hard to find in a draft weak at the top.

He's giving the Chiefs NE as a trade partner saying they are going to give up 20 spots and a huge point value for Matt Cassell...which makes me want to kill myself.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.