SenselessChiefsFan |
03-06-2009 12:47 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
(Post 5560683)
I really don't think we're going to a 3-4.
I think Vrabel's position here is a passing down rush end. At this point in his career, it's a smart way to use him.
We don't have a NT. We just don't. We didn't make a play for any of the guys in FA that fit that spot.
We don't really have 3-4 ends. If we were really going to do this, I think we'd have at least looked at Olshansky.
We would basically be wasting last year's #5 overall pick. Also a waste of Hali. So we waste 50% of our last 4 first round picks to switch to a defense we have basically NO personnel for.
We're short at least 1 starting OLB for a 3-4, and really would need another player that could take a lot of snaps as Vrabel is going to need a breather at this stage of his career. Didn't even look at Dansby.
I don't buy it. What's the upside? I don't see any.
I think people are grasping at straws.
|
Really, the way many teams run the 3-4, it is more like a 5-2.
I think that they will have Vrabel on one side, Hali on the other. I think McBride and Boone play end. I think Dorsey plays NT on passing downs and DE on passing downs.
Igor plays the one position that I think they are very stacked at for the 3-4.
The Chiefs will draft Curry (IMO), put him inside with DJ, and allow Pollard to play in the box.
I think the Chiefs are definitely going to the 3-4, and I think Pollard, DJ and Hali will all benefit from it. Oh, and I think that Dorsey will be much better than most understand.
|