ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Sanchez...I hope he sucks. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206841)

Mr. Kotter 04-27-2009 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88 (Post 5720324)
God knows you're the beacon of love and tolerance, Dane.


No kidding....the irony is side-splittingly hilarious. LMAO

Molitoth 04-27-2009 06:37 PM

If Cassel sucks THAT bad, then we can draft Bradford next year....

SAUTO 04-27-2009 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5720327)
I'd be willing to buy that argument if he then didn't spend the #3 overall on a 3-4 DE, which says anything but value.

Plus, if you'd really think the two equal, you take the younger option.

ok
in my mind the 2 are very comparable though. and many others see it. cassel has actually done it in the NFL

MoreLemonPledge 04-27-2009 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 5720346)
If Cassel sucks THAT bad, then we can draft Bradford next year....

I KNEW IT.

Pablo 04-27-2009 06:38 PM

I'm just ecstatic the draft is over. For CP's sake. Watching two separate groups so entrenched in their beliefs and convictions that they almost became irrational animals was sort of like wandering into the DC forum.

And I don't even hate Sanchez, yet. But I'm sure I'll get sick of ESPN's swallowing his mexi-roll by at least the 3rd or 4th week into the regular season that I'll start to develop a small seed of hate for him.

BryanBusby 04-27-2009 06:40 PM

He has all the potential to be a great QB for the Jets, but I hesitate because the Jets are almost forced to throw him in the fire Week 1 and he's going to struggle. Who do the Jets have for him to throw the ball to outside of Jericho Cotchery? He needs to work on raising his release point, dealing with the New York wind and adjust to scanning a pro Defense.

mlyonsd 04-27-2009 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5720327)
I'd be willing to buy that argument if he then didn't spend the #3 overall on a 3-4 DE, which says anything but value.

Plus, if you'd really think the two equal, you take the younger option.

My thinking has always been Pioli picked Cassel because he was a known commodity (to him) and that in rebuilding a team at this point in time Cassel makes more sense then going with a rookie.

In the end Pioli is using Cassel as a patch while building the team from the line out. He's hedging his bets Cassel will fill a need long enough to fix our deeper other problems.

cdcox 04-27-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 5720346)
If Cassel sucks THAT bad, then we can draft Bradford next year....

Not this.

SAUTO 04-27-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 5720369)
My thinking has always been Pioli picked Cassel because he was a known commodity (to him) and that in rebuilding a team at this point in time Cassel makes more sense then going with a rookie.

In the end Pioli is using Cassel as a patch while building the team from the line out. He's hedging his bets Cassel will fill a need long enough to fix our deeper other problems.

i disagree here, IMO there will be a longterm deal in place soon

Molitoth 04-27-2009 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge (Post 5720351)
I KNEW IT.

Knew what? lol.

I'm ALL about giving Cassel a chance. He has succeeded at the NFL level for a year, I think he should be given another chance. Personally I think he should be given more then just another 1 year chance, but I'm saying if he is THAT bad... and I'm talking BAD.... then we can just draft Bradford next year. Makes sense to me!

and I'm only mentioning Bradford because I know there will be lots of CP jocking his nuts next year. You can use his name as a variable to whatever QB you think is the next jesus.

MoreLemonPledge 04-27-2009 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth (Post 5720387)
Knew what? lol.

I'm ALL about giving Cassel a chance. He has succeeded at the NFL level for a year, I think he should be given another chance. Personally I think he should be given more then just another 1 year chance, but I'm saying if he is THAT bad... and I'm talking BAD.... then we can just draft Bradford next year. Makes sense to me!

and I'm only mentioning Bradford because I know there will be lots of CP jocking his nuts next year. You can use his name as a variable to whatever QB you think is the next jesus.

My argument in another thread was that even if Cassel has a Pro Bowl year, people will be calling for him to be traded so that we can draft Bradford. The grass is always greener.

RJ 04-27-2009 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 5720101)
I'm not proud of the fact that I hope Sanchez turns out to be a dismal failure.

It started with the planet arguing about Sanchez vs. Cassel. I don't mind a decent argument on QB's but after getting rid of both Carl and Herm that alone should have been enough of a positive move forward to keep the issue civil. Taking issue with Pioli picking the QB he wanted over an unproven college draftee was silly. Then bitching about not picking Sanchez during the draft for trade bait instead of letting Pioli getting the guy he really wanted sealed the deal.

So for mostly whiny, petty feelings I hope he sucks. I don't want him to get hurt but would love to see him crying on the sidelines when he's finally replaced as a starter. I hope the first time he's called on to make a game saving throw it's evident when he chits is pants. I hope Blackledge has better numbers when their collective careers are done.

I'm going to root against him more than I did Elway. Ok, that was a stretch but I will totally enjoy every interception, every bad pass, every sack.


Rep. Well said, sir, well said.

cdcox 04-27-2009 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlyonsd (Post 5720369)

In the end Pioli is using Cassel as a patch while building the team from the line out. He's hedging his bets Cassel will fill a need long enough to fix our deeper other problems.

Thigpen out of the spread could have done this or some marginal vet. Pioli took Cassel to be his Brady.

Mr. Krab 04-27-2009 06:49 PM

Um, shouldn't we hope that the QB for every other team sucks?

mlyonsd 04-27-2009 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5720379)
i disagree here, IMO there will be a longterm deal in place soon

With "patch" I meant "proven need". No doubt in my mind Pioli thinks Cassel fills that need. He chose him because he knew what he can do.

QB is a very tough position and he chose the guy thinking he wouldn't need to worry about that through the draft, training camp, season.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.