ChiefsPlanet
Page 3 of 12 12 3 4567 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Warren Sapp on Dorsey and LJ (NFL.com chat) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=207780)

Sweet Daddy Hate 05-17-2009 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 5772237)
Yes they do. Our new coach says that Denver will be switching using a lot of the 3-4 and the 4-3 because New England had a lot of success with it.
I see by your avatar that Knowshon is an LJ fanboy. How cute.:evil:

DaneMcCloud 05-17-2009 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5772226)
They don't get in the backfield because they're not that great at it.

They have a 1-gap assignment, which means it's NOT their job to tie up blockers. You said to show you a team that doesn't use it's 3-4 linemen to tie up blockers and I just did.
Canty must be good at something since the Giants gave him a $7 million per year deal.

Mecca 05-17-2009 12:48 AM
Canty will probably see time at DT in NY but with a draft pick of Sintim..and some of their other moves the Giants can give 3-4 looks now.

Silock 05-17-2009 12:58 AM
EVEN IF Dorsey plays the majority of time in the 3-4 and just ties up blockers, if he can penetrate and use his skills on the rare 4-3 switch . . . what's the problem, exactly?

htismaqe 05-17-2009 05:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 5772379)
Why does the GM get to pick the scheme? Shouldn't that be the Head Coach's call?

"You get me the talent, I make it all happen"?
I'm sure the head coach wants to run the same scheme as the GM. After all, the GM gets to pick the coach, too.

whoman69 05-17-2009 06:28 AM
I foresee Dorsey playing end on regular downs, and NT on obvious passing downs with Magee coming in to play end.

milkman 05-17-2009 06:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xbarretx (Post 5772304)
just because Sapp wasnt good at it doesnt mean gleen wont as well. all the Dorsey haters better give the man credit when hes proves you guys wrong :clap:
Who is a Dorsey hater?

shitgoose 05-17-2009 07:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5772155)
**** YOU
Better watch it or I'll spit a drink in your face

RNR 05-17-2009 07:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5772415)
Canty will probably see time at DT in NY but with a draft pick of Sintim..and some of their other moves the Giants can give 3-4 looks now.
Your green dots say you are "almost as cool as Mecca" :spock: I would think it would say "behold I am Mecca" or something along those lines.....anyway carry on

htismaqe 05-17-2009 09:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 5772461)
I foresee Dorsey playing end on regular downs, and NT on obvious passing downs with Magee coming in to play end.
They already said Magee would be sliding inside on passing downs. Remember, he was a 4-3 DT in college, just like Dorsey.

B_Ambuehl 05-17-2009 10:37 AM
People should differentiate what 3-4 scheme they're referring to. There is basically a Philips 3-4 and Parcells 3-4. Parcells and Bellichiks are 2 gap, Phillips is a lot more 1-gap. Seymour got 8 sacks playing a 2 gap D, which is a rarity.

The one we're evolving to is most likely the 2 gap variety like Parcells and Bellichiks.

Hammock Parties 05-17-2009 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by THISmaqe (Post 5772573)
They already said Magee would be sliding inside on passing downs. Remember, he was a 4-3 DT in college, just like Dorsey.
Should be interesting to see what our 4-3 pass rush package might be. Magee, Jackson, Hali and Johnston?

Hammock Parties 05-17-2009 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by whoman69 (Post 5772461)
I foresee Dorsey playing end on regular downs, and NT on obvious passing downs with Magee coming in to play end.
They've already said Dorsey isn't starting.

RNR 05-17-2009 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5772669)
They've already said Dorsey isn't starting.
Why do you have a picture of Jason Whitlock in your sig??

Hammock Parties 05-17-2009 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider (Post 5772731)
Why do you have a picture of Jason Whitlock in your sig??
The better question is why don't you?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 PM.
Page 3 of 12 12 3 4567 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.