ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 3-3 after six games. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214347)

Bearcat 09-17-2009 10:14 AM

I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season. :spock:

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 6081086)
:spock: I watched the Oakland/San Diego game, the Oakland lines of scrimmage looked like a heck of a challenge for our boys.

We shall see. It will give us a good barometer as to how good San Diego is, or whether they may be a little overated.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog (Post 6081068)
I agree with the three wins



but I think they'll have three after seventeen games, not six

Wow, so we are going to win the opener next year? Awesome.

Old Dog 09-17-2009 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081149)
Wow, so we are going to win the opener next year? Awesome.

Seventeen WEEKS....but the point remains.

Of course if your dumb ass was SENSIBLE you would have already been able to figure that out for yourself.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6081142)
I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

Last week's game reminded me a lot of the 2003 season, when we had some very lucky breaks, but a large group of people (myself included) decided to completely ignore the huge problem. Of course, I'm not comparing the two teams, but I'd think years later people wouldn't take one game so seriously. Let's give up 500 yards every week, rush for 30, and have a ToP with a 2/1 ratio, and see how we do the rest of the season. :spock:


I don't remember a pass being deflected by the corner and ending up in the hands of our WR.

That's a lucky break.

I saw a lot of guys keep scratching and fighting and finding a way to stand in against a more talented team.

That isn't luck.

The punt block was the right call at the right time.

The interception was a ridiculously great catch from a fully extended player.

Luck isn't losing your starting QB in the preseason. Luck isn't having your best defensive player out.

KCrockaholic 09-17-2009 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6081142)
I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

:LOL:

I guess you dont have the mind of a scout. Or understand the importance of it.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:24 AM

Man, you guys take things waaaay too seriously.

Look, I picked out two games that I think the Chiefs have a better chance to win than most think. There are specific reasons I picked those games....but, I won't be 'shocked' if the Chiefs don't win.

But, what fun is it to predict something that everyone else is predicting?

Besides, this board is so negative all the time, the homers merely balance it out a little.

And, predicting 0-16 or even 2-14 isn't 'realistic'..... it is pessimistic. Just like 3-3 is optimistic.

The Franchise 09-17-2009 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081096)
Thanks for the update. Sheesh, I had no idea.... wait... I did.

His average rushing per game in Denver was.... drumroll... 106 yards

His average rushing game in Washington has been.... 85 yards.

For those of you who struggle with math, that is 20% more yards per game.

Additionally, his yards per carry average in Denver was 5.5. His yards per carry average in Washington has been..... 4.09 yards per carry. He averaged a yard and a half more per carry in Denver.

Now, who is the dumbass? You have to look a little deeper... but it sounds like that might be hard for you.

Read this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6081110)
I think the problem is we havent proven to be able to stop the running game. Skins can control the clock and pound away at 4 yards a carry and pick up first down after first down. Sure, he may not break out a 75 yard run like he did in Denver. But he can still pick up 10 runs of 75 yards and it all adds up the same way.


Sweet Daddy Hate 09-17-2009 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6080983)
ROFL

**** Dallas. That team will either soar this season or drop to the bottom of an ocean crevasse. There is NO middle ground with the Cowboys this year.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by truebigdog (Post 6081157)
Seventeen WEEKS....but the point remains.

Well, crap.... here I was thinking we were going undefeated next year......lol.

Rooster 09-17-2009 10:26 AM

Yeah.....That's the ticket
 
1 Attachment(s)
.

Bearcat 09-17-2009 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081159)
I don't remember a pass being deflected by the corner and ending up in the hands of our WR.

That's a lucky break.

I saw a lot of guys keep scratching and fighting and finding a way to stand in against a more talented team.

That isn't luck.

The punt block was the right call at the right time.

The interception was a ridiculously great catch from a fully extended player.

Luck isn't losing your starting QB in the preseason. Luck isn't having your best defensive player out.

Eh, call it luck or capitalizing off the Ravens' mistakes or whatever... my point was geared much more towards the part about how, if we played like that every week, we won't be tied with 5 minutes to go in the game. I don't care if it was the mighty Ravens last week and the lowly Raiders this week... let's do that again and see how it turns out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcrockaholic4life (Post 6081166)
:LOL:

I guess you dont have the mind of a scout. Or understand the importance of it.

Guess that's why I said...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6081142)
I don't know why anyone would want to watch a game more than once, unless it was to go back and focus on specific players.. and even that can lead to over analyzing.

And, no, I'm not a scout or a coach or a player, so unless I wanted to go back and focus on specific players, why would I want to watch that game again? So I can start overanalyzing and seeing things that weren't there?

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6081184)
Read this.

Again, he was better in Denver, dumbass.... MUCH better... that was my point.

If you didn't mean to imply otherwise, you should have probably done a better job of not being a dumbass with all your dumbassery.

Don't be a dumbass....dumbass.

Portis with Broncos MUCH better. Know it, learn it, love it.... sleep with it.... make babies with it, grow old with it.... but quit being a dumbass.

Not even sure what all that means..... but I was on a roll.

The Franchise 09-17-2009 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081200)
Again, he was better in Denver, dumbass.... MUCH better... that was my point.

If you didn't mean to imply otherwise, you should have probably done a better job of not being a dumbass with all your dumbassery.

Don't be a dumbass....dumbass.

Portis with Broncos MUCH better. Know it, learn it, love it.... sleep with it.... make babies with it, grow old with it.... but quit being a dumbass.

Not even sure what all that means..... but I was on a roll.

Dude.....that was 5 ****ing years ago. It's not like he JUST got traded last year.

Dumbass.







































Dumbass.

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-17-2009 10:32 AM

"That thread's got a lot of quit in him".

http://images.starpulse.com/pictures...AAG-003820.jpg


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.