Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6121731)

The bigger question we all should ask ourselves here is, would Sanchez succeed behind this awful offensive line the Chiefs employ?

I would probably incline to say "no".

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie (Post 6121744)

This is such NY media drivenm crap. Sanchez has not exactly lit the place up. Put him on the shitty Chiefs you think he'd do any better? Put Cassel on the Jets with the talent there and he would put up more than 165 yards. I think he showed last year what he could do with a supporting cast.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6121736)

Are you aware that Sanchez is 22 and Cassel is 27 so what's that say if you feel Sanchez is better right now?

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 6121717)

Every one associated with the Pats organization is cashing in on Bill Belichick's success, but none of them have achieved squat and the Pats have kept right on winning.

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6121753)

That Sanchez is better younger than Cassel is older?

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6121730)

Errr, okay.

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6121739)

And the Jets do not have to trade a pick for getting Sanchez, yes?

Originally Posted by LaChapelle (Post 6121747)

If you really cared for Sanchez you wouldn't want he to be with such a loser franchise.

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 6121760)

The Jets traded their 1st round pick and a couple of players for the rights to Clevelands 1st round pick.

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6121769)

But the Chiefs did not have to do that, right? They could have just selected Sanchez and chose not to do so?

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6121750)

The thing is no one in their right mind picked the Jets to be 3-0 everyone had them last winning 4 or 5 games so of course Sanchez is getting a ton of play.

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6121769)

But the Chiefs did not have to do that, right? They could have just selected Sanchez and chose not to do so?