ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs that bullshit call just cost us this game (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215505)

RNR 10-04-2009 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding (Post 6136714)
So what happened?

A big hit on a reciever in the shoulderpads, ref called personal foul. It was a clean hit and a bullshit call that will have nothing to do with KC losing this game

Buck 10-04-2009 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider (Post 6136754)
A big hit on a reciever in the shoulderpads, ref called personal foul. It was a clean hit and a bullshit call that will have nothing to do with KC losing this game

Yeah, shit happens. That happens to every team at least 4-5 times each season.

reiko57 10-04-2009 11:26 PM

i disagree, you never know how the ebb and flow of a game is going to pan out, i know i would much rather have watched a game where they didn't blow that call than the game we got...

DRU 10-05-2009 12:34 AM

What I'm still confused about is whether or not they actually did blow the call or if this new "defenseless receiver" rule is actually going to be called that way..??

I always just assumed it meant only on plays where the ball was un-catch-able or out-of-play. But when you really think about it he was indeed defenseless whether it's catch-able or not.

So if they really did call it "correctly" because of the new rule then that's really going to suck because an entire aspect of the game will be taken away. That hit was absolutely perfect. The ball hit the receiver's hands and he buried his shoulder directly into his chest separating the receiver from the ball. Absolutely perfect...but...he was defenseless.

So is that how they're calling it or did the ref's think he hit him in the head? If they consider that the new rule then they need to not let receivers run "defenseless" routes anymore.

Mecca 10-05-2009 12:36 AM

I think they thought he hit him in the head, the NFL is aware of all of the brain damage studies on former players, they are cracking down on that.

'Hamas' Jenkins 10-05-2009 12:39 AM

There's always an excuse with Chiefs fans, except for the only one that's actually true: the other team was better.

blazzin311 10-05-2009 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reiko57 (Post 6140615)
i disagree, you never know how the ebb and flow of a game is going to pan out, i know i would much rather have watched a game where they didn't blow that call than the game we got...

Agreed.

philfree 10-05-2009 02:41 AM

Didn't cost the Chiefs the game but it did have effect on the game. Pus.s.ified version of the NFL....it's making it where it's not worth the money to watch.

PhilFree:arrow:

Bwana 10-05-2009 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider (Post 6136754)
A big hit on a reciever in the shoulderpads, ref called personal foul. It was a clean hit and a bullshit call that will have nothing to do with KC losing this game

Bingo

Skip Towne 10-05-2009 05:49 AM

Shut up, n00b

beach tribe 10-05-2009 06:07 AM

From what I have seen, and I know this is crazy, and i don't really believe it, just one of my conspiracy theories, is that the refs do NOT like Haley. He talks to them like dogs, and they hate him, and will never give him a call. I know these refs talk to each other. They hate him.

beach tribe 10-05-2009 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRU (Post 6140696)
What I'm still confused about is whether or not they actually did blow the call or if this new "defenseless receiver" rule is actually going to be called that way..??

I always just assumed it meant only on plays where the ball was un-catch-able or out-of-play. But when you really think about it he was indeed defenseless whether it's catch-able or not.

So if they really did call it "correctly" because of the new rule then that's really going to suck because an entire aspect of the game will be taken away. That hit was absolutely perfect. The ball hit the receiver's hands and he buried his shoulder directly into his chest separating the receiver from the ball. Absolutely perfect...but...he was defenseless.

So is that how they're calling it or did the ref's think he hit him in the head? If they consider that the new rule then they need to not let receivers run "defenseless" routes anymore.

No way. That's just how you play safety, and if it would have been Bob Sanders, they would never have called that a penalty.

Mr. Arrowhead 10-05-2009 06:24 AM

it didnt cost us the game, but i will say, that was the worst call i have ever seen

Hydrae 10-05-2009 06:43 AM

My thought after that horrible call was that they should just change the league to the NHL - the No Hitting League.

Easy 6 10-05-2009 09:10 AM

IIRC, the guys on the halftime show were in unanimous agreement...terrible call.

Trent Dilfer especially, was very vocal & passionate about it, 'They're protecting players to the point that its hurting the game'.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.