Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 6536853)

Yeah because Clausen is such a sure thing.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 6536820)

Soooo we have needs on both lines, CB, LB, WR, and Safety yet we're going to pay top 5 money to a QB who has no business being taken that high to sit behind Cassel?

Sorry I just fail to see how that's a "good idea". Like it or not, Haley and Pioli are hitched to Cassel and aren't going to give up on him after one or two seasons.

I can't believe anyone would advocate taking Clausen over Berry, Bryant, or even friggin Okung.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6536971)

I would love to have Clausen...

Make 2010 Matt Cassel's make or break year...

and if he breaks, like everyone expects, at least we have a top tier, top talent guy ready to take over in 2011...

If Cassel plays well I can't find a negative either...

I'd rather have 2 QB's than 0 QB's...

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6537000)

yeah he'll make probably around 28 or 30 guaranteed if we take him at #5...that's a huge contract any way you look at it

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 6536853)

Yeah because Clausen is such a sure thing.
Posted via Mobile Device

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 6536982)

and if we're going to pay two 3-4 ends $60M guaranteed we might as well pay two QB's $60M guaranteed...

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 5553403)

You're just the one that made the entire 1st round of this thing irrelevant.

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 5553435)

I find it hilarious...you are probably one of the most book smart people on this site...yet you're such an arrogant asshole you don't realize how much common sense you've lacked since this whole Cassel to KC thing has happened. You're such an arrogant dumbass you have struck out Pioli before he had a month to be the GM of the Chiefs. You are such an arrogant dumbass you ruined one of the coolest things going on this site (this mock draft) by being the 'Chiefs GM' and drafting a QB at #3 when they just spent #34 on a QB...

and then you defend it by saying you think it would be a good idea to draft Sanchez in case Cassel flops...shit, we might as well spend our 1st and 2nd every year on QB's...eventually one will pan out!

JFC dude...for all the shit you dish out to all the "morons" and "true fans"...it's time to look in a ****ing mirror.

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 5553450)

Get over yourself.

Who else is bitching that I've ruined this mock draft other than you?

Sorry, I thought that the point of a mock draft was to take the player that you thought would be the best fit for the long term interests of the franchise.

If Cassel flops, the rebuild is even further behind, because you are stuck with a terrible QB class in 2010.

I don't see BJ Raji or Aaron Curry as players worth hedging the Cassel bet on. The fact of the matter is that if we don't draft Sanchez or Stafford, we are putting all of our eggs in the basket of a guy who didn't start a game in college, who threw 40% of the # of TDs that the starter from the previous year did (who you claim was a system quarterback, no less), and who was surrounded by the best coaching staff and best offensive talent in place in all of football, and yet still took way too many sacks, and whose production was more tied to his receivers (55% of his YAC) than any other QB in the league by far.

I'm not sold on Matt Cassel. The golden rule of the draft is that if you don't have a franchise QB, you don't pass on one. I don't think Cassel is a franchise QB. I'm not going all in with Matt Cassel.

But I guess we should trust your judgment, seeing that you said Favre was going to have a Monster year last year, thought Huard was the solution to our problems, wanted us to bring in Jeff Garcia, and that you think Brady is a system quarterback.

I'm sorry, but you are the George Costanza of quarterbacks. Every evaluation you make isn't just wrong, it's spectacularly wrong.

I guess the Cowboys were correct in passing on Joe Montana in the 1979 draft even though he was the #1 player on their board because they had Danny White.

I guess the Cowboys were wrong in hedging their bets with Aikman by drafting Steve Walsh.

I guess Matt Cassel has no future trade value

I guess we have no cap room to absorb to QB salaries

I guess that this draft is supposedly the one with elite defensive talent, and not 2010.

Of course, you know all this stuff about the draft since you admit that you don't even follow college football.

Stop aping the opinions of what you read last week and goosestepping behind a GM without any thought. I know it's a lot to expect from you, but I have a little bit of faith.

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 5553240)

I love the draft...I don't know what you're talking about? I know you build your team using the draft, not free agency...

I lurk in these mock drafts all the time...I thought the one last year was awesome.

I just can't believe Hamas decided to mess with the integrity of the draft because he's a ****ing tool bag that is an arrogant piece of shit.

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon (Post 5553034)

Yeah, it's a mock draft that Hamas decided to take a shit on because of his vendetta with the Cassel trade.

This mock is reflecting REAL LIFE NFL TRADES...that's why the Chiefs no longer have the #34 overall...BECAUSE OF THE MATT CASSEL TRADE...which means there is no way they are taking Sanchez at #3...

So instead of keeping the integrity of the mock in tact, Mr. Arrogant decided to ruin the whole first 15 picks of the draft and made the first round of this mock completely irrelevant...

I was interested in seeing which 'GM' was going to take Sanchez...I can't say I'm surprised that Hamas decided to shit all over the rest of you...that's the type of person he is.