When you play not to lose, as Marty did throughout most his coaching career in the playoffs, with the Chiefs and the Chargers, then you put your players in a position where mistakes are magified.

In essense, Marty's philosophy resulted in what some would describe as players choking.

Last year, the Chargers went into that Jet game with a game plan centered on a brokedick Tomlinson.

All I want to know is, what was Norv Turner smoking?

Me, either. And you're right, Mr. spanky, after McInsuck he seemed like a Godsend.

Still, we knew we needed a right tackle. It's, frankly, amazing how far our o-line has fallen. Carl did us no favors in this regard. Nobody was in line to step up when our Big Willie and Medium-Sized Willie retired.

FAX

Your thirst for knowledge is inspiring, Mr. milkman.

ROFL

Seriously, good post. This pretty much validates your opinion of Albert which is encouraging. The rest of the line? ... not looking too good, here.

It will piss a lot of people off, but we need to spend draft picks (and probably some high ones) for linemen. We simply have to have them.

FAX

It was the o-lines fault for not winnning a super bowl? Dumbass.

At least we know this ... Ron Tepper is a CPlanet poster.

Good read MM. I think Lilja is done, JMO. Albert hopefully gets better and becomes the player he can be. We need a RT bad. Maybe Big Bad Barry will finally step.
Posted via Mobile Device

At least we know.....dumbasses will never consider the idea that they may be wrong.

I dobut Richardson will ever be anything. I'd be for drafting cousin ****er I guess in the later rounds.

Is Barry Richardson that giant guy we drafted?

EDIT: No ... I'm thinking of Colin Brown.

FAX

At least we know ... Milkman is still a raging prick with a big mouth.

Have I ever argued that I'm not?

I'm not sure how it's insulting if true.

It's like saying I have brown hair with some gray sneaking in.

Dane would be so proud

I'm all for drafting a RT. Just not at position #5. And not drafting a LT at #5 and moving Albert either. If we trade down somehow... our #5 and #50 for SF's #13 and #17 for example is a wash on points... then I am OK if one of those two picks is spent on a RT. No trade down, which is more likely, I would draft a RT late 2nd or eraly 3rd. JMO

If you don't agree with Laz your Danes pet. Is that all you ball lickers can come up with?

I need some help here. It is hell getting old, and not remembering things as clearly as in my younnger days. What was Alberts injury? I know his rookie year he had a leg in training camp, and then an elbow during the season, but I can not remember his injury from last season.