![]() |
Stupid Eric Berry question here, but will we be lining him up at strong safety? I've been assuming free safety the whole time, but saw something somewhere that mentioned strong safety. Honestly, I haven't paid attention because I assumed he was a free safety.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I dont think it can be looked at in a vacuum.
I believe what we should look at is Berry + the #36 (McCluster) versus a #5 (Okung, Williams D or T, etc) & Thomas.. I Like the latter better, although Berry + a different #36 might have made me happier. |
Quote:
Page can't play SS and there's not really another SS on the roster. So the only place Berry can really play is SS with Page at FS. That greatly diminishes one of his greatest strengths (playmaking ability). Just another example of a poor pick that hurts the overall roster beyond the opportunity cost. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There was no way we were getting Okung and Thomas unless you think the Seahawks were going to trade us both of their firsts to move up from 6 to 5. |
Quote:
I guess that's why I'm scratching my head, too. People keep comparing him to Ed Reed, but Reed's a free safety. In fact, pretty much every first-round safety ever has been a free safety, and virtually every top-15 pick as far as I know. It's much easier to swallow a free-safety as a top-15 pick over a strong safety. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even when Pioli did something I liked, he promptly damaged it's value. |
Quote:
|
Two first names
case closed stupid southern hick |
Playing Berry at SS with a poor NT and no ILB's to speak of = injury waiting to happen.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.