ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   MU What's going on at Missouri? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=232376)

Frazod 08-23-2010 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6950862)
Why drink booze in Missouri when there's so much meth around?

I guess someone who derives pleasure from ****ing the livestock wouldn't understand about college kids drinking.

WilliamTheIrish 08-23-2010 03:48 PM

Venom. Hate.

Titty Meat 08-23-2010 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6950887)
Venom. Hate.

Coach Gil will say a prayer for them.

Spott 08-23-2010 04:22 PM

We'll just replace him with another guy that can't cover anyone and is always out of position.

Chiefs Pantalones 08-23-2010 04:40 PM

It's Columbia. Living there nine months out of your life will make you go crazy.

teedubya 08-23-2010 04:46 PM

Lack of institutional control... Next thing you know there will be a ticket scandals and shit.

kstater 08-23-2010 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6950999)
Lack of institutional control... Next thing you know there will be a ticket scandals and shit.

Well that stuff does happen everywhere.

Chiefs Pantalones 08-23-2010 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6950999)
Lack of institutional control... Next thing you know there will be a ticket scandals and shit.

And championships and shit. Damn the bad luck.

duncan_idaho 08-23-2010 05:24 PM

1) Ebner has not practiced much this fall, but Luke Lambert was the favorite to start at MLB, anyway - because he's more assignment-sound and much better in coverage.

2) It's a DUI offense. First time the kid has been in any trouble. He's hardly Hunter Teafatiller. It's not good, but this is far from the worst thing done by one of the local college athletes.

3) I'd much rather deal with this type of thing than have five starters lost for the season before it ever begins. Wow, Nebraska fans, bad luck up there.

While I'm taking to billay and company... has to be worrisome that 40 percent of your starting OL is now out for the season, considering you're a run-first team. Even if Martinez wins the starting job, you're still run-first (probably even more so). Right?

Puts even more pressure on a defense that has to replace an awful lot. How will the corners look when opposing QBs have time to throw something other than a slant, out or dig? How is that DL going to look without someone to draw constant double teams (though I did see one Nebraska writer claim Suh and Crick were each double-teamed on every single play...)

Should be a fun year. I understand Nebraska confidence (the game is in Lincoln, after all), but I don't understand the absolute arrogance and scoffing at even the thought that MAYBE Missouri MIGHT give them a game up there.

Typical internet fandom, I guess...

Titty Meat 08-23-2010 06:27 PM

You mean 1/5 of the o-line Duncan? Smith wasn't going to be the starter at left tackle and the o-line last year was garbage. Arrogance? You gave up 27 points in 1 quarter to a shitty 1 armed QB and 2 injured Rb's.

POND_OF_RED 08-23-2010 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6951057)
While I'm taking to billay and company... has to be worrisome that 40 percent of your starting OL is now out for the season, considering you're a run-first team. Even if Martinez wins the starting job, you're still run-first (probably even more so). Right?

Puts even more pressure on a defense that has to replace an awful lot. How will the corners look when opposing QBs have time to throw something other than a slant, out or dig? How is that DL going to look without someone to draw constant double teams (though I did see one Nebraska writer claim Suh and Crick were each double-teamed on every single play...)

Should be a fun year. I understand Nebraska confidence (the game is in Lincoln, after all), but I don't understand the absolute arrogance and scoffing at even the thought that MAYBE Missouri MIGHT give them a game up there.

Typical internet fandom, I guess...

This. It's pretty ridiculous. A team that hasn't found a starting QB and has no real playmakers at WR somehow feels like it's a clear walk to the Big 12 championship. That defense is one of the best in the country still I have no doubt in that but defense really doesn't win championships anymore IMO. It would if you can place a top 25 offense with it but to be so unbalanced just isn't good. If teams can find a way to score early on Nebraska they are in a lot of trouble with their style of play. They really can't comeback from a 2-3 TD deficit with the offense they throw on the field. That's why I'm really hoping we can see Mizzou put up a couple early TD's in Lincoln this year because if they get out to a lead I don't see them relinquishing it against a run first team like the Nubs. I can't wait for the season to get here.

alanm 08-23-2010 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED (Post 6951163)
This. It's pretty ridiculous. A team that hasn't found a starting QB and has no real playmakers at WR somehow feels like it's a clear walk to the Big 12 championship. That defense is one of the best in the country still I have no doubt in that but defense really doesn't win championships anymore IMO. It would if you can place a top 25 offense with it but to be so unbalanced just isn't good. If teams can find a way to score early on Nebraska they are in a lot of trouble with their style of play. They really can't comeback from a 2-3 TD deficit with the offense they throw on the field. That's why I'm really hoping we can see Mizzou put up a couple early TD's in Lincoln this year because if they get out to a lead I don't see them relinquishing it against a run first team like the Nubs. I can't wait for the season to get here.

Considering most of their problems on offense last year were due to the oline starters playing hurt every week and the rest redshirting and the QB playing hurt after the VT game they scaled back the offense to the basics. This year with the exception of Mike Smith who is out for the year with a broken leg and who was slated for back up duty we're still in great shape depth wise. Helu is healthy. He played with a separated shoulder for most of the season, Burkhead is healthy. He broke his foot and missed 5 games. The whole offense was walking wounded last year. Still they had to play thru it and it showed. This season I think you'll be shocked at how good their going to be on offense.

BigRedChief 08-23-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 6950544)
Ebner isn't a starter and hasn't really practiced much to this point.

Burton will be your best LB by the end of the year. Next year defintely.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-23-2010 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6950862)
Why drink booze in Missouri when there's so much meth around?

Why eat bread when you can shove all that Kansas wheat up your ass and call it fiber? :p

duncan_idaho 08-23-2010 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 6951191)
Considering most of their problems on offense last year were due to the oline starters playing hurt every week and the rest redshirting and the QB playing hurt after the VT game they scaled back the offense to the basics. This year with the exception of Mike Smith who is out for the year with a broken leg and who was slated for back up duty we're still in great shape depth wise. Helu is healthy. He played with a separated shoulder for most of the season, Burkhead is healthy. He broke his foot and missed 5 games. The whole offense was walking wounded last year. Still they had to play thru it and it showed. This season I think you'll be shocked at how good their going to be on offense.

Keith Williams is out for the season as well, not sure if you saw that. Smith was an important depth guy and insurance in case the JUCO LT didn't work out.

And, sorry, don't completely buy all of that about the offense. Whether Lee was hurt or not (and even if he was, they decided to keep playing him AND keep having him run the ball as much as he did/take as many hits as he did?). The offensive line was just average-good, returns most of the same guys (minus the best guy, Williams) and they're all upper-classmen (so their best growth likely is behind them). The fact that you had to move a TE (even a good one like McNeil) to WR doesn't bode well for that unit either.

And sorry, just don't buy that the defense will be as dominant/great without Suh. It still will be good, still be a top 15-20 unit, but you don't lose a player that outstanding and just collectively replace him.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.